Skip to main content

1-20 of 508 results for subject:QinetiQ

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Let me begin by joining all the other Members who have congratulated you on your appointment, Madam Deputy Speaker.

I am grateful to my hon. Friend the Member for Ross, Skye and Lochaber (Ian Blackford) for allowing me to take some of his allotted time. In doing so, he recognised that...

Member
Brendan O'Hara (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 June 2015
Reference
597 cc856-9
House
House of Commons

Madam Deputy Speaker, I should like to add my congratulations to you on your election. This is the first time I have had the opportunity to serve under your chairmanship. When we first arrived in Parliament in 2005, we served together on the Work and Pensions Select Committee, and I...

Member
Philip Dunne (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 June 2015
Reference
597 cc859-860
House
House of Commons

May I get clarification on something? The Minister said that this would lead to £1 million of savings for the MOD, but the knock-on effect to the local economy will be that the fishing boats will be cleared out of the new extended range. There will therefore be a devastating...

Member
Brendan O'Hara (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 June 2015
Reference
597 c861
House
House of Commons

I am interested to hear what the Minister is saying. The reason there is so much concern is that some of the information that came from QinetiQ, which ended up in the public domain, referred to a much larger exclusion zone than he is expressing in his statement today. The...

Member
Ian Blackford (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 June 2015
Reference
597 c861
House
House of Commons

My understanding is that QinetiQ enjoys a close and co-operative relationship with local fishermen and their representatives. Although it may not have engaged in a direct consultation in relation to the impact on fishing, it is absolutely our intention to do so, and I will come on to that in...

Member
Philip Dunne (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 June 2015
Reference
597 c862
House
House of Commons

If that is the case, why is it that construction activity seems to have started?

Member
Ian Blackford (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 June 2015
Reference
597 c862
House
House of Commons

I will come on to that in a moment.

I recognise that the people who are most likely to be affected by the BUTEC plans will be those whose livelihoods depend on fishing the waters of the Inner Sound, which is the concern that has been particularly expressed in this debate....

Member
Philip Dunne (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 June 2015
Reference
597 cc862-3
House
House of Commons

I look forward to the consultation exercise, and I will be satisfied if what the hon. Gentleman has laid out turns out to be the case. Hopefully he

understands why there are legitimate concerns. The information that came into the public domain from QinetiQ paints a very different picture from...

Member
Ian Blackford (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 June 2015
Reference
597 c863
House
House of Commons

All I will say to the hon. Gentleman is that I think it behoves him to act responsibly as a Member of Parliament and not to foment his constituents into getting overexcited about something until he is well informed about the situation. We all have to deal with contentious issues...

Member
Philip Dunne (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 June 2015
Reference
597 c864
House
House of Commons

Can I be absolutely clear that the extension of the range has absolutely nothing to do with the proposed renewal of Trident? I find it difficult to comprehend that such an investment would be made in an underwater submarine test facility when the Government are clearly on record as supporting...

Member
Brendan O'Hara (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 June 2015
Reference
597 c864
House
House of Commons

As I tried to make clear at the outset, this is about improving the efficiency of the facilities that exist at the moment in the Inner Sound. We are, in essence, taking two separate locations under the water and combining them into one. The functionality of what happens under the...

Member
Philip Dunne (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 June 2015
Reference
597 cc865-6
House
House of Commons

Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Ian Blackford
Answering member
Philip Dunne
Department
Ministry of Defence
Type
Adjournment debates
Date
23 June 2015
Reference
597 cc854-866
House
House of Commons

I shall come on to deal with the hon. Gentleman’s comments about the impact on the fishing industry, because that is the thrust of the argument being made by Scottish National party Members. In short, that vision is not shared by the MOD, and I will come on to explain...

Member
Philip Dunne (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 June 2015
Reference
597 c861
House
House of Commons

I congratulate you on your appointment, Madam Deputy Speaker. It is a pleasure to speak in this debate with you in the Chair. I welcome the opportunity to raise this issue. I have heard many hon. Members in the past couple of days asking, what is BUTEC? It is the...

Member
Ian Blackford (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 June 2015
Reference
597 cc855-8
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what contracts his Department has with QinetiQ; and what the (a) monetary value and (b) length is of each such contract.

Asked by
Lord Beamish (Labour)
Answering body
Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
28 November 2013
Reference
177308; 571 cc436-8W
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what discussions his Department had with QinetiQ before conclusion of the agreement on Long Term Partnering prior to its announced restructuring and partial sell-off.

Asked by
Alison Seabeck (Labour)
Answering body
Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
18 November 2013
Reference
175152; 570 c703W
House
House of Commons

(2) what discussions he has had with his US counterpart on cyber-security breaches at Qinetiq North America; and if he will make a statement;

[159062]

Nicholas Soames:

Asked by
Lord Soames of Fletching (Conservative)
Answering body
Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
17 June 2013
Reference
159062; 564 cc495-6W
House
House of Commons

(3) what assessment he has made of the potential risks to UK national security arising from cyber-security breaches at Qinetiq North America; and if he will make a statement.

[159063]

Nicholas Soames:

Asked by
Lord Soames of Fletching (Conservative)
Answering body
Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
17 June 2013
Reference
159063; 564 cc495-6W
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence pursuant to the answer of 25 February 2013, Official Report, column 30W, on QinetiQ: pensions, whether he expects to be able to sign off the pension costs before the end of the financial year.

[150646]

Asked by
Alison Seabeck (Labour)
Answering body
Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
15 April 2013
Reference
150646; 561 c60W
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what recent discussions his Department has had with QinetiQ regarding the clarification of pension costs supplied by that company as part of the long-term partnering agreement.

[R]

[143276]

Asked by
Alison Seabeck (Labour)
Answering body
Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
25 February 2013
Reference
143276; 559 c30W
House
House of Commons