Skip to main content

1-20 of 1,222 results for subject:Radioactivity

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

More

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

More

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask Her Majesty's Government what steps are being taken to ensure that the UK maintains its monitoring programmes of the levels of radioactivity in the environment following withdrawal from the Euratom Treaty;  whether a reciprocal notification system will be established to ensure that the UK and the Euratom member...

Asked by
Lord Carlile of Berriew (Crossbench)
Answering body
Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
29 January 2018
Reference
HL4915
House
House of Lords
Laid by
Sarah Newton
Department
Department for Work and Pensions
Type
Statutory instruments
Date
30 November 2017
Reference
SI 2017/1075
House
House of Lords; House of Commons
Type
Select Committee written evidence; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Defence Committee
Date
8 April 2014
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence when the Commodore at Faslane Naval Base was alerted that collant radioactivity had been detected in the prototype reactor at NRTE Dounreay.

Asked by
Gemma Doyle (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Answering body
Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
20 March 2014
Reference
192099; 577 c702W
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence when his Department became aware of the detection of low levels of radioactivity in cooling water surrounding a prototype core at the Naval Reactor Test Establishment at Dounreay; and when he first made the Scottish Environmental Protection Agency aware of this issue.

Asked by
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Answering body
Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
13 March 2014
Reference
191068; 577 c323W
House
House of Commons

Nuclear Submarines

The following is the answer given by the Secretary of State for Defence, the right hon. Member for Runnymede and Weybridge (Mr Hammond), to the hon. Member for Ellesmere Port and Neston (Andrew Miller), following his Statement to the House on Nuclear Submarines on 6 March 2014.

Having worked with...

Member
Lord Hammond of Runnymede (Conservative)
Department
Ministry of Defence
Type
Ministerial corrections
Date
11 March 2014
Reference
577 cc3-4MC
House
House of Commons

On a point of order, Mr Speaker—

Member
Pete Wishart (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 March 2014
Reference
577 c45
House
House of Commons

I am grateful, Mr Speaker. Last Thursday, the Secretary of State for Defence made a statement on the radiation leak at the Government’s Vulcan nuclear reactor test establishment at Dounreay. He said that

“there has been no measurable change in the radiation discharge.”—[Official Report, 6 March 2014; Vol. 576, c. 1085.]

We...

Member
Pete Wishart (Scottish National Party)
Type
Points of order
Date
10 March 2014
Reference
577 c45
House
House of Commons

Before I make my statement, I am sure that the House will want to join me in sending condolences to the family and friends of the sapper from 32 Engineer Regiment who sadly died while on duty in Helmand province yesterday as a result of non-battle related injuries sustained in...

Member
Lord Hammond of Runnymede (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 March 2014
Reference
576 cc1077-9
House
House of Commons

I join the Defence Secretary in paying tribute to the soldier from the 32 Engineer Regiment. His death is a reminder of the service and sacrifice given to our country by the armed forces, and our thoughts are with his family and loved ones at this time. I thank the...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 March 2014
Reference
576 cc1079-1081
House
House of Commons

I am grateful to the hon. Gentleman, and by and large we agree on the importance of these matters, but I am afraid I must start by saying that I am not particularly minded to take lectures on transparency from someone who was a member of the previous Government. The...

Member
Lord Hammond of Runnymede (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 March 2014
Reference
576 cc1080-2
House
House of Commons

My right hon. Friend said that the consequences of this announcement for the Astute fleet would be the subject of further review. We all understand that the levels of radioactivity that he has announced are low, but what monitoring will be done of the cooling system in our operational Astutes...

Member
Lord Arbuthnot of Edrom (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 March 2014
Reference
576 c1082
House
House of Commons

We carry out daily sampling and analysis of the coolant water in all our nuclear submarines.

Member
Lord Hammond of Runnymede (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 March 2014
Reference
576 c1082
House
House of Commons

Can I say to the Secretary of State that the fact that some people may react in an irresponsible way is a reason to be more open on this issue, not a reason to be less open—as he appeared to suggest in his reply to my hon. Friend the Member...

Member
Bob Ainsworth (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 March 2014
Reference
576 c1082
House
House of Commons

Of course, as the right hon. Gentleman might anticipate, those are questions that I have already asked of the programme managers throughout this process. There are technical factors in the design of the core that limit the scope to change aspects of the design, but now that we are aware...

Member
Lord Hammond of Runnymede (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 March 2014
Reference
576 cc1082-3
House
House of Commons

I commend my right hon. Friend on his decision. What we are seeing is a vindication of the safety models that have been followed by successive Governments in relation to our nuclear submarine programme, and there is certainly no excuse for scaremongering or irresponsible language. In fact, we should be...

Member
Liam Fox (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 March 2014
Reference
576 c1083
House
House of Commons

As my right hon. Friend says, Governments of both persuasions over the years have adopted a prudent and precautionary approach to the safety of our nuclear submarine fleet, and have invested money, where it is necessary to do so, on the basis that safety always takes priority. As I have...

Member
Lord Hammond of Runnymede (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 March 2014
Reference
576 c1083
House
House of Commons

Continuous at-sea deterrence is of course the foundation of our deterrent policy. As the Secretary of State knows much better than I do, it requires not only the Vanguard-class submarines to be continuously at sea, but the Trafalgar and the Astute classes to be around. The worst-case scenario would be...

Member
Lord Walney (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 March 2014
Reference
576 c1083
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman asks sensible questions, but he is verging into speculative matters at this stage. This is a very tiny flaw in a reactor that has been hammered at maximum output over a long time. It is premature to suggest that when we examine the core we will find...

Member
Lord Hammond of Runnymede (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 March 2014
Reference
576 c1083
House
House of Commons

I thank the Defence Secretary for his statement and commend him on his actions. He has acted, rightly, on the precautionary principle—and, God willing, he is acting more cautiously than is necessary. The UK has the highest nuclear standards, but one can never be too cautious on nuclear safety. If...

Member
Nick Harvey (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 March 2014
Reference
576 c1084
House
House of Commons