Skip to main content

1-20 of 854 results for subject:Redcar

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

More

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

More

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of whether the process for the sale of scrap metal from the ex-Redcar Steelworks has brought value for money for the public.

Asked by
Baroness Armstrong of Hill Top (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
6 February 2024
Reference
HL1834
House
House of Lords

The Government do not agree with that position. The Audit Commission was bureaucratic; it tied up local government with tick-box exercises rather than having real value. That is why it was abolished. It is right that we have the proper processes in place to ensure proper accountability, transparency and value...

Member
Baroness Penn (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 January 2024
Reference
835 c1135
House
House of Lords

My Lords, would it be reasonable for this House to expect the mayor, who, as the Minister said, is a Member of this House, to perhaps attend this debate and answer some of the questions?

Member
Lord Mackenzie of Framwellgate (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 January 2024
Reference
835 c1135
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this Statement repeat is by the Government to respond on their position on this report. As I have set out, the Secretary of State has written to the mayor and asked for his response to its recommendations within six weeks. We will then consider any further steps that...

Member
Baroness Penn (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 January 2024
Reference
835 c1135
House
House of Lords

My Lords, as the noble Baroness, Lady Pinnock, said, there are many areas of concern that are yet to be covered by any investigation. Indeed, the report notes that many issues raised by third parties were outside the scope of its review, such as those raised regarding wildlife die-off and...

Member
Baroness Bennett of Manor Castle (Green Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 January 2024
Reference
835 c1136
House
House of Lords

I do not believe that there are any further plans to cover any further reviews.

Member
Baroness Penn (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 January 2024
Reference
835 c1136
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the report says clearly that the measures in place

“do not meet the standards expected when managing public funds”.

I have read the recommendations and I look forward to the mayor’s response to them. Does the Minister think that, outside of the mayor’s response, the Government have a duty to...

Member
Baroness Chapman of Darlington (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 January 2024
Reference
835 c1136
House
House of Lords

I say to the noble Baroness that we have considered the panel’s findings against the draft best value guidance, which was published in July 2023, and concluded that they do not meet the test for urgent intervention. The panel makes a number of recommendations for the combined authority, the development...

Member
Baroness Penn (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 January 2024
Reference
835 c1136
House
House of Lords

The Minister has mentioned a number of benefits—and no one disputes that regeneration benefits are required—but does she accept that those benefits have come totally on the back of public sector investment and that, as the report says, no private sector investment has gone towards them, yet still the liabilities...

Member
Lord Scriven (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 January 2024
Reference
835 c1136
House
House of Lords

The reality is that a project of this size will require significant public sector investment, which has taken place, but the review is also clear that remediation of this size and scale would not be able to

take place without private partners also participating. We are making sure that we...

Member
Baroness Penn (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 January 2024
Reference
835 c1136
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the noble Baroness, Lady Ford, asked about the lack of the audit function in local authorities. The Minister said that the Government had put “processes in place” to replace the Audit Commission. Can she explain what those processes are, and whether they will now be involved in investigating...

Member
Lord Lennie (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 January 2024
Reference
835 c1137
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the Audit Commission regulated, micro-managed and inspected local councils, forcing them to spend time ticking boxes and filling in forms rather than getting on with the business of local government. It hindered transparency and scrutiny. Local government can put in its own systems of local authority financial reporting...

Member
Baroness Penn (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 January 2024
Reference
835 c1137
House
House of Lords

I have not heard anyone advocating for the Audit Commission; what we have been saying is that, since the Audit Commission went, the private sector auditors who have been appointed have struggled to deal with the complexities of joint venture auditing. That is the issue. With that in mind, will...

Member
Baroness Taylor of Stevenage (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 January 2024
Reference
835 c1137
House
House of Lords

I am afraid that I will have to disappoint the noble Baroness on her first question. We will not be referring this matter to the NAO. However, as I said in my initial response, the NAO has said that it will reflect on the findings of the review for its...

Member
Baroness Penn (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 January 2024
Reference
835 c1137
House
House of Lords

Lords statement on the independent review into the South Tees Development Corporation and the Teesworks joint venture, which the Government are publishing today, having received the final report last week.

Lead member
Baroness Penn
Department
Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities
Type
Ministerial statements
Date
30 January 2024
Reference
835 cc1124-1137
House
House of Lords

My Lords, at the heart of this issue are the people of Teesside and the public asset formerly owned by them, which should be regenerated for their benefit, to generate jobs, employment and industry. They should also be receiving sufficient return for their investment of land and the other value...

Member
Baroness Taylor of Stevenage (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 January 2024
Reference
835 cc1124-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the Minister for the Statement. What a sad state of affairs it is that a vital and very large regeneration project in the north-east of England has to be the subject of an independent government review because of justified public criticism and concern.

The Financial Times and...

Member
Baroness Pinnock (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 January 2024
Reference
835 cc1128-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank both noble Baronesses for their questions. Before I turn to the specific points, it is worth reminding the House of the context of both the review and the work being done in Tees Valley by the development corporation.

Remediating and regenerating the former Redcar steelworks is a...

Member
Baroness Penn (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 January 2024
Reference
835 cc1129-1132
House
House of Lords

The Minister said it was not the National Audit Office’s role to investigate individual authorities—or something like that—but the report has revealed at least massive financial mismanagement of this project. It seems that, since the report was published, further calls to the National Audit Office to investigate this have been...

Member
Lord Lennie (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 January 2024
Reference
835 c1131
House
House of Lords

My answer is the same as before: the Secretary of State, at the time of the review, considered the suggestion that the NAO undertake the review. But it is not its role to audit or examine individual local authorities, and its powers would not normally be used for that purpose....

Member
Baroness Penn (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 January 2024
Reference
835 c1131
House
House of Lords