Skip to main content

1-20 of 48 results for subject:Rochester

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how far away from residential properties are the planned new prisons at (a) Yorkshire, adjacent to HM Prison Full Sutton, (b) HM Young Offenders Institute Rochester and (c) HM Young Offenders Institute Hindley.

Asked by
Stephen Kinnock (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Justice
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
18 October 2017
Reference
107059
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what discussions she has had with each local authority in (a) Port Talbot, (b) Yorkshire, (c) Rochester and (d) Hindley on her proposals to build prisons in those areas.

Asked by
Liz Saville Roberts (Plaid Cymru)
Answering body
Ministry of Justice
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
25 April 2017
Reference
70340
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what category she plans that the proposed prison in (a) Port Talbot, (b) Yorkshire, (c) Rochester and (d) Hindley will be; and if she will make a statement.

Asked by
Liz Saville Roberts (Plaid Cymru)
Answering body
Ministry of Justice
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
25 April 2017
Reference
70339
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what discussions she has had with the Prison Officers Association on her Department's proposals for building new prisons in Port Talbot, Yorkshire, Rochester and Hindley.

Asked by
Liz Saville Roberts (Plaid Cymru)
Answering body
Ministry of Justice
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
25 April 2017
Reference
70341
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, whether her Department has carried out a socio-economic impact assessment on its proposals for building new prisons in Port Talbot, Yorkshire, Rochester and Hindley.

Asked by
Liz Saville Roberts (Plaid Cymru)
Answering body
Ministry of Justice
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
25 April 2017
Reference
70342
House
House of Commons

I was disappointed to learn of staff reductions at BAE Systems, including at the site in my constituency. Will my right hon. Friend outline what support his Department can offer to our local suppliers to ensure that the skills behind the innovation are secured in my constituency?

Asked by
Kelly Tolhurst (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Topical questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
12 December 2016
Reference
618 c499
House
House of Commons

I share my hon. Friend’s disappointment at the news that BAE Systems is reducing employment at the Rochester site—after all, we are spending quite a lot of money with BAE at the moment. But I am sure that the people she mentions have exemplary skills, and I can say on behalf of the Government that we will do everything we can to make sure that those valuable skills are redeployed in other areas of this avionics speciality.

Answered by
Harriett Baldwin (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
12 December 2016
Reference
618 c499
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what estimate he has made of the reduction in journey time from Rochester to London that will result from the new station in Rochester and the improvements to signalling on that route being undertaken by Network Rail.

Answering body
Department for Transport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
20 January 2015
Reference
220626
House
House of Commons

Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Lord Beamish
Answering member
Lord Swire
Department
Foreign and Commonwealth Office
Type
Adjournment debates
Date
24 October 2014
Reference
586 cc1227-1232
House
House of Commons

This is the fourth Adjournment debate that I have secured on the case of Christopher Rochester in the past 13 years. I and his family wish that it was unnecessary, after 14 years, to raise the case again.

Christopher Rochester, a 24-year-old constituent of mine from Chester-le-Street in North Durham, died...

Member
Lord Beamish (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 October 2014
Reference
586 cc1228-1230
House
House of Commons

I congratulate my old friend the hon. Member for North Durham (Mr Jones) on securing the debate, and I pay tribute to him for the strong support that he has given Mr Rochester’s family over what is now a long period. As he said, his predecessor Lord Radice did the...

Member
Lord Swire (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 October 2014
Reference
586 cc1230-2
House
House of Commons

What the Greek Ministry of Justice has been asked for is a Government document. Will the Minister make representations to his Greek counterpart to see whether there is some other method? This family is not in a position to get the finance together to do what has been suggested by...

Member
Lord Beamish (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 October 2014
Reference
586 c1232
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman is right—of course they will not get closure until they see the whole report. However, the Greeks are standing firm on this matter and have said that the results can be disclosed only to a next of kin or legally appointed representative. We will raise the case...

Member
Lord Swire (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 October 2014
Reference
586 c1232
House
House of Commons

Our plans predate small business Saturday, but this weekend in Rochester we have a Christmas fair and also a Dickens weekend. They attract many thousands of people to Rochester, which has, almost entirely, independent small businesses. Will the Minister join me in welcoming that?

Asked by
Mark Reckless (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Business, Innovation and Skills
Topical questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
5 December 2013
Reference
571 c1083
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman is adding his name to the roll call. Perhaps we could simplify this process, whereby if everybody in the House who does not support small business Saturday puts up their hands.

Answered by
Vincent Cable (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department for Business, Innovation and Skills
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
5 December 2013
Reference
571 c1086
House
House of Commons

Adjournment debate on the case of Christopher Rochester.

Lead member
Lord Beamish
Answering member
David Lidington
Department
Foreign and Commonwealth Office
Type
Adjournment debates
Date
26 May 2010
Reference
510 c278-82
House
House of Commons

I congratulate the hon. Member for North Durham (Mr Jones) on securing this debate. When I received the detailed briefing earlier today, it became clear that he has been the doughtiest champion imaginable for his constituents. I have totted up that he has written nearly 40 letters, not only to...

Member
David Lidington (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 May 2010
Reference
510 c280-2
House
House of Commons

I am grateful, Mr Deputy Speaker, to be able to raise again the case of Christopher Rochester in the House. It is nine years since I first raised this case, and it saddens me that a conclusion has not yet been reached, and closure has not yet been brought for...

Member
Lord Beamish (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 May 2010
Reference
510 c278-80
House
House of Commons

(2) who authorised the commencement of building work at Rochester Prison.

Asked by
Oliver Heald (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Justice
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
13 June 2007
Reference
142482; 461 c1137W
House
House of Commons

To ask the Minister of State, Ministry of Justice pursuant to the answer of 6 June 2007, Official Report, column 605W, on Prisons: Rochester, what related demolition or construction works have already been undertaken at HMP Rochester;

Asked by
Oliver Heald (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Justice
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
13 June 2007
Reference
142433; 461 c1137W
House
House of Commons