Skip to main content

1-20 of 805 results for subject:Scientists

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

More

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

More

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Statement on the publication of the third report of the Science, Innovation and Technology Committee, Science diplomacy: sovereignty, strategy, and the global race (HC 62).

Lead member
Chi Onwurah
Department
Science, Innovation and Technology Committee
Type
Backbench debates; Select Committee statements
Date
9 July 2026
Reference
789 cc529-534
House
House of Commons

I am grateful to the Backbench Business Committee for allocating time for this statement from the Science, Innovation and Technology Committee on our report, “Science diplomacy: Sovereignty, strategy and the global race”. I am pleased to see members of the Committee in the Chamber. I want to put on record...

Member
Chi Onwurah (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 July 2026
Reference
789 cc535-1
House
House of Commons

I start by thanking the Chair of the Science, Innovation and Technology Committee and its entire membership for the publication of a very interesting and timely report. Business, academia and the whole tech sector needs clarity, in some ways more than anything else. Does the Chair share my concerns, which...

Member
Ben Spencer (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 July 2026
Reference
789 c531
House
House of Commons

It is one of the thrusts of the report that we need greater clarity on sovereignty. This is not an academic debate—we do not need philosophical discussions on what sovereignty may or may not mean—but as the shadow Minister indicated, on tech stacks, particular technologies and their supply chains, we...

Member
Chi Onwurah (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 July 2026
Reference
789 cc531-2
House
House of Commons

I welcome this very interesting and timely report, and I particularly welcome the recognition that one of the barriers to developing or strengthening our sovereignty is the lack of access to deep capital markets at the later stages of start-ups’ development. Will the Chair tell the House a little bit...

Member
Gordon McKee (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 July 2026
Reference
789 c532
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend highlights an important point in the report on investment and access to it, particularly for sovereign capabilities. That may be for what we call deep tech, which is tech that requires a long-term investment and that will not yield a return tomorrow, or even next year. We...

Member
Chi Onwurah (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 July 2026
Reference
789 c532
House
House of Commons

I thank my hon. Friend for the report, and for all the hard work her Committee has put into it. I was very interested in the section about space. Does she share my pleasure in the announcement today that the SaxaVord space station is likely to have a launch of...

Member
Patricia Ferguson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 July 2026
Reference
789 c532
House
House of Commons

I think it is brilliant. SaxaVord got some investment from the UK Government.

Member
Chris Bryant (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 July 2026
Reference
789 c532
House
House of Commons

In addition to acknowledging the investment from the UK Government, may I ask whether my hon. Friend’s Committee agrees with the recommendation of the Scottish Affairs Committee, which I chair, that we should have a Minister for space in Government? That is because we recognise the cross-cutting nature of many...

Member
Patricia Ferguson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 July 2026
Reference
789 c532
House
House of Commons

I thank my hon. Friend and Select Committee Chair for that excellent question, and congratulate Scotland on the proposed launch. The Committee chose space as one of the lenses through which to look at science diplomacy and all the issues associated with it. Though we did not recommend a Minister...

Member
Chi Onwurah (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 July 2026
Reference
789 c533
House
House of Commons

I am proud to represent Shoreditch, which has a lot of tech start-ups, so I welcome my hon. Friend’s report. Following on from the question from, and answer to, my hon. Friend the Member for Glasgow South (Gordon McKee), will she expand on how we can get that money into...

Member
Meg Hillier (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 July 2026
Reference
789 c533
House
House of Commons

I thank my hon. Friend and Chair of the Treasury Committee for her question. She highlights one of the principal concerns regarding technology-driven growth, which we reported on in our report “Flying blind: innovation, growth and the regions”: the access to capital, particularly for the kind of tech start-ups that...

Member
Chi Onwurah (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 July 2026
Reference
789 cc533-4
House
House of Commons

I am very happy to complete this hat trick of Scottish colleagues. I thank my hon. Friend for this excellent report, and I agree about the need to focus on science diplomacy, which is an opportunity for the UK; we should be much more ambitious about what we do.

As a...

Member
Alan Gemmell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 July 2026
Reference
789 c534
House
House of Commons

I thank my hon. Friend for that question, because it gives me the opportunity to put on record how much the work of the SINs, which I now think are called the SATs, or something—

Member
Chi Onwurah (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 July 2026
Reference
789 c534
House
House of Commons

SAINTs, maybe.

Member
Alan Gemmell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 July 2026
Reference
789 c534
House
House of Commons

Yes, the SINs and the SAINTs. The name may have changed, and there are concerns about the level of support they are receiving from the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office, but there was unanimous support for the work they did. There are countless examples of that support having enabled tech...

Member
Chi Onwurah (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 July 2026
Reference
789 c534
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what assessment she has made of the potential merits of (a) adding more female scientists to the National Curriculum and (b) making it mandatory for exam boards to include them in the syllabus.

Asked by
Catherine West (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Education
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
27 March 2026
Reference
121781
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, what estimate he has made of the number of UK-trained scientists who have left the UK workforce following redundancies in the pharmaceutical and life sciences sectors over the past 15 years.

Asked by
Angus MacDonald (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
10 February 2026
Reference
108568
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, what steps he is taking to support the retention and re-employment of UK scientists alongside plans to recruit scientists from overseas.

Asked by
Angus MacDonald (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
4 February 2026
Reference
108570
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what directions his Department has given to the Atomic Weapons Establishment on changes to its Distinguished Scientist cohort.

Asked by
Lee Dillon (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
24 November 2025
Reference
92347
House
House of Commons