1-20 of 192 results for subject:Shoeburyness
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.358 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.004 seconds
- Search query
- subject:Shoeburyness
- We searched for
- subject_t:Shoeburyness OR subject_ses:296900
Type
House
Session
Year
Department
Member
More
Primary member
Answering member
More
Legislative stage
Legislation
Subject
More
Publisher
To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what estimate her Department has made of the funding required to provide new capacity in Shoeburyness High School before September 2018.
To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what estimate her Department has made of the funding required to provide new capacity in Shoeburyness High School before September 2018.
Nationally, we have allocated £5.8bn from 2015 to 2020 to create more school places. Between 2010 and 2016, 735,000 new school places have been created.
Local authorities are responsible for planning and securing sufficient school places in their area, and supporting them in doing so is one of this Government’s top priorities. Local authorities make decisions on where to add capacity, based on local circumstances. Southend-on-Sea has received £20 million for new places between 2011 and 2017 and has been allocated a further £9.5 million for 2017 to 2020.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence (1) what steps he is taking to ensure that East Beach in Shoeburyness is surveyed for any unexploded ordnance and that remedial works are carried out as a matter of urgency;
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence (1) what steps he is taking to ensure that East Beach in Shoeburyness is surveyed for any unexploded ordnance and that remedial works are carried out as a matter of urgency;
East Beach is managed by Southend-on-Sea borough council under a licence agreement with the Ministry of Defence (MOD). The decision to close the beach was made by the council and it will be for them to determine when to re-open it. As such, no estimates have been made by the MOD about the economic effect of the Council’s decision to the local economy.
A MOD survey of East Beach will assist in the formulation of a risk management plan that will focus mitigation work on those areas of the beach at greatest risk. It is too early to say what mitigation work will be required, when it will be carried out, and how long it will take to complete.
(2) what estimate he has made of (a) the economic effect on and (b) changes in tourism revenue in Southend as a result of the closure of East Beach in Shoeburyness for his Department to survey for unexploded ordnance;
James Duddridge:
(2) what estimate he has made of (a) the economic effect on and (b) changes in tourism revenue in Southend as a result of the closure of East Beach in Shoeburyness for his Department to survey for unexploded ordnance;
James Duddridge:
East Beach is managed by Southend-on-Sea borough council under a licence agreement with the Ministry of Defence (MOD). The decision to close the beach was made by the council and it will be for them to determine when to re-open it. As such, no estimates have been made by the MOD about the economic effect of the Council’s decision to the local economy.
A MOD survey of East Beach will assist in the formulation of a risk management plan that will focus mitigation work on those areas of the beach at greatest risk. It is too early to say what mitigation work will be required, when it will be carried out, and how long it will take to complete.
(3) what the timescale is for his Department to (a) survey East Beach in Shoeburyness for unexploded ordnance and (b) carry out remedial works;
James Duddridge:
(3) what the timescale is for his Department to (a) survey East Beach in Shoeburyness for unexploded ordnance and (b) carry out remedial works;
James Duddridge:
East Beach is managed by Southend-on-Sea borough council under a licence agreement with the Ministry of Defence (MOD). The decision to close the beach was made by the council and it will be for them to determine when to re-open it. As such, no estimates have been made by the MOD about the economic effect of the Council’s decision to the local economy.
A MOD survey of East Beach will assist in the formulation of a risk management plan that will focus mitigation work on those areas of the beach at greatest risk. It is too early to say what mitigation work will be required, when it will be carried out, and how long it will take to complete.
(4) how long his Department expects East Beach in Shoeburyness to be closed.
James Duddridge:
(4) how long his Department expects East Beach in Shoeburyness to be closed.
James Duddridge:
East Beach is managed by Southend-on-Sea borough council under a licence agreement with the Ministry of Defence (MOD). The decision to close the beach was made by the council and it will be for them to determine when to re-open it. As such, no estimates have been made by the MOD about the economic effect of the Council’s decision to the local economy.
A MOD survey of East Beach will assist in the formulation of a risk management plan that will focus mitigation work on those areas of the beach at greatest risk. It is too early to say what mitigation work will be required, when it will be carried out, and how long it will take to complete.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence (1) what the maximum decibel noise measurements were from the Shoeburyness explosion site on the morning of 7 June 2013;
[163501]
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence (1) what the maximum decibel noise measurements were from the Shoeburyness explosion site on the morning of 7 June 2013;
[163501]
The maximum noise level attributable to activity at the Ministry of Defence Shoeburyness Test and Evaluation range on the morning of 7 June 2013 was 114 decibels (dB). This activity was part of a process to qualify new propellant for the 4.5 inch naval gun. The noise did not exceed maximum levels permitted under the Control of Noise at Work Statutory Instrument and fell well below the establishment's contractually imposed noise operating limit of 125 dB.
(2) what munitions were being tested at the Shoeburyness explosion site on the morning of 7 June 2013; and whether the noise exceeded the recommended maximum of noise pollution levels.
[163502]
Mr Carswell:
(2) what munitions were being tested at the Shoeburyness explosion site on the morning of 7 June 2013; and whether the noise exceeded the recommended maximum of noise pollution levels.
[163502]
Mr Carswell:
The maximum noise level attributable to activity at the Ministry of Defence Shoeburyness Test and Evaluation range on the morning of 7 June 2013 was 114 decibels (dB). This activity was part of a process to qualify new propellant for the 4.5 inch naval gun. The noise did not exceed maximum levels permitted under the Control of Noise at Work Statutory Instrument and fell well below the establishment's contractually imposed noise operating limit of 125 dB.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence (1) what assessment he has made of the viability of developing housing on his Department's land in Shoeburyness;
[163532]
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence (1) what assessment he has made of the viability of developing housing on his Department's land in Shoeburyness;
[163532]
The Ministry of Defence has not made any assessments or received any proposals on the viability of developing housing on land at Shoeburyness.
(2) what proposals his Department has received to develop housing on its land in Shoeburyness.
[163533]
James Duddridge:
(2) what proposals his Department has received to develop housing on its land in Shoeburyness.
[163533]
James Duddridge:
The Ministry of Defence has not made any assessments or received any proposals on the viability of developing housing on land at Shoeburyness.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what quantity of radioactive material was released by the explosion in August 2002 at Shoeburyness; and if he will make a statement.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what quantity of radioactive material was released by the explosion in August 2002 at Shoeburyness; and if he will make a statement.
(2) how many claims for compensation were received for damage to property caused by explosions at Shoeburyness from residents living in (a) Maldon District, (b) Chelmsford Borough, (c) Rochford District, (d) Colchester Borough, (e) Tendring District, (f) Southend on Sea, (g) Castlepoint District and (h) Kent in each year since...
(2) how many claims for compensation were received for damage to property caused by explosions at Shoeburyness from residents living in (a) Maldon District, (b) Chelmsford Borough, (c) Rochford District, (d) Colchester Borough, (e) Tendring District, (f) Southend on Sea, (g) Castlepoint District and (h) Kent in each year since...
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence (1) how many awards of compensation were paid for damage to property caused by explosions at Shoeburyness to residents living in (a) Maldon District, (b) Chelmsford Borough, (c) Rochford District, (d) Colchester Borough, (e) Tendring District, (f) Southend on Sea, (g) Castlepoint...
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence (1) how many awards of compensation were paid for damage to property caused by explosions at Shoeburyness to residents living in (a) Maldon District, (b) Chelmsford Borough, (c) Rochford District, (d) Colchester Borough, (e) Tendring District, (f) Southend on Sea, (g) Castlepoint...
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how many complaints about noise caused by explosions at Shoeburyness were received from residents living in (a) Maldon District, (b) Chelmsford Borough, (c) Rochford District, (d) Colchester Borough, (e) Tendring District, (f) Southend on Sea, (g) Castlepoint District and (h) Kent in...
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how many complaints about noise caused by explosions at Shoeburyness were received from residents living in (a) Maldon District, (b) Chelmsford Borough, (c) Rochford District, (d) Colchester Borough, (e) Tendring District, (f) Southend on Sea, (g) Castlepoint District and (h) Kent in...
| District | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 | 1998 | 1999 | 2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007¹ |
| Maldon | 56 | 91 | 23 | 49 | 58 | 48 | 51 | 50 | 19 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 7 |
| Chelmsford | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Rochford | 60 | 48 | 45 | 31 | 86 | 48 | 74 | 16 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Colchester | 12 | 44 | 5 | 20 | 23 | 38 | 22 | 14 | 13 | 3 | 3 | 10 | 0 |
| Tendring | 107 | 206 | 79 | 129 | 222 | 322 | 239 | 154 | 127 | 56 | 110 | 87 | 7 |
| Southend | 33 | 109 | 30 | 65 | 52 | 48 | 35 | 25 | 3 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 |
| Castlepoint | 2 | 1 | 6 | 5 | 10 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kent | 360 | 155 | 91 | 335 | 543 | 333 | 477 | 217 | 48 | 75 | 158 | 112 | 30 |
| Total | 635 | 656 | 279 | 634 | 995 | 838 | 901 | 476 | 216 | 148 | 277 | 216 | 48 |
| ¹ Year to 4 July 2007. |