Skip to main content

1-15 of 15 results for subject:Snuff

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Clause 47 agreed to on division (16 votes to 1). Clauses 48 and 49 agreed to. Amendments to clause 50 negatived on division (3 votes to 13 and 3 votes to 11). Clauses 50 to 57 agreed to. Amendments to clause 58 negatived on division (3 votes to 11 in...

Lead member
Andrew Gwynne
Answering member
Caroline Johnson
Department
Department of Health and Social Care
Type
Public Bill Committee proceedings; Debates on bills
Committee
Tobacco and Vapes Bill Committee
Date
21 January 2025
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, if she will make an estimate of the number of hospital admissions for issues related to the taking of snuff in the last (a) 12 months, (b) five years and (c) 20 years.

Asked by
Alexander Stafford (Conservative)
Answering body
Department of Health and Social Care
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
15 May 2024
Reference
25394
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, if she will make an estimate of the annual cost to the NHS of (a) cigar smoking and (b) snuff taking.

Asked by
Alexander Stafford (Conservative)
Answering body
Department of Health and Social Care
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
15 May 2024
Reference
25395
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, with reference to her Department's policy paper entitled Stopping the start: our new plan to create a smokefree generation, published on 8 November 2023, whether it is her policy to include snuff tobacco products in these proposals.

Asked by
Julian Knight (Independent (affiliation))
Answering body
Department of Health and Social Care
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
15 January 2024
Reference
7985
House
House of Commons

Motion to consider. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Robert Jenrick
Answering member
Peter Dowd
Department
Treasury
Type
Debates on delegated legislation; Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings
Committee
First Delegated Legislation Committee
Date
17 June 2019
House
House of Commons

To ask the hon. Member for Caithness, Sutherland and Easter Ross, representing the House of Commons Commission, how much snuff was administered to hon. Members by the doorkeepers in the last 10 years; and at what cost.

Asked by
Rehman Chishti (Conservative)
Answering body
House of Commons Commission
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
18 October 2013
Reference
171423; 568 c897W
House
House of Commons

Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks - SCENIHR. Health effects of smokeless tobacco products. 157 p.

Deposited by
Department of Health
Type
Deposited papers
Date
17 December 2012
Reference
DEP2012-1908
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Health (1) if he will request (a) his Department's Chief Scientific Adviser and (b) the Government's Chief Scientific Advisers' Committee to conduct an assessment of the published scientific evidence concerning the health risks associated with the use of Swedish snus and other forms...

Asked by
Paul Flynn (Labour)
Answering body
Health
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
17 December 2012
Reference
133408; 555 cc645-6W
House
House of Commons

(2) with reference to paragraph 5.11 of his Department's Tobacco Control Plan for England, Healthy Lives, Healthy People, if he will cite the scientific evidence used to assess the health risks associated with the use of smokeless tobacco.

[133461]

Paul Flynn:

Asked by
Paul Flynn (Labour)
Answering body
Health
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
17 December 2012
Reference
133461; 555 cc645-6W
House
House of Commons

That this House welcomes the confirmation from Cancer Research UK Action on Smoking and Health and the Royal College of Physicians that some forms of smokeless tobacco are between 500 and 1,000 times less hazardous than smoking tobacco; agrees with the conclusion that, if Britain followed the Swedish pattern of...

Primary sponsor
Paul Flynn (Labour)
Type
Early day motions
Date
10 December 2003
Reference
261
House
House of Commons

That this House welcomes the confirmation from Government that smokeless tobacco is less dangerous than cigarettes and the remarkable reduction of cancer deaths in Sweden as a result of smokeless tobacco use; notes that smokeless tobacco is used as an aid by a third of Swedes who quit smoking; is...

Primary sponsor
Paul Flynn (Labour)
Type
Early day motions
Date
26 November 2003
Reference
90
House
House of Commons

That this House welcomes the remarkable reduction of cancer deaths in Sweden following the drop in smoking by Swedish males from 36 per cent. of the population in 1980 to 17 per cent. now; notes that smokeless tobacco is used by half of Sweden's male tobacco users but is rare...

Primary sponsor
Paul Flynn (Labour)
Type
Early day motions
Date
14 January 2003
Reference
511
House
House of Commons

Westminster Hall adjournment debate on smokeless tobacco (moist snuff or snus)

Lead member
Paul Flynn
Answering member
David Lammy
Department
Department of Health
Type
Adjournment debates
Date
7 January 2003
Reference
397 c62-8WH
House
House of Commons

Tobacco Advertising and Promotion Bill (HL). Lords debate on motion that the House do now resolve itself into a committee, agreed to on question. Lords Committee stage first day. Clauses 1-3 agreed to.

Department
Department of Health
Type
Committee of the Whole House (HL); Debates on bills
Date
16 November 2001
Reference
628 c789-859
House
House of Lords

List of scientific evidence for banning snuff: bibliography. DH. 1992.

Deposited by
Department of Health
Type
Deposited papers
Date
6 February 1992
Reference
HINF 92/0098