Skip to main content

1-20 of 38 results for subject:SoftBank

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask Her Majesty's Government whether (1) ministers, or (2) senior civil servants, have met either (a) Mr Lex Greensill, or (b) representatives of Greensill Capital or SoftBank, since 1 January; and if so, (i) who attended the meeting, and (ii) on what dates were the meetings held.

Asked by
Lord Myners (Crossbench)
Answering body
Treasury
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
30 March 2021
Reference
HL14286
House
House of Lords

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what assessment his Department has made of the potential merits of holding discussions with (a) Softbank and Arm on the Softbank/Arm deal of 2016 and (b) Nvidia and Arm on the Softbank/Nvidia Arm deal of 2020.

Asked by
Daniel Zeichner (Labour)
Answering body
Treasury
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
13 October 2020
Reference
98989
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport, whether he is seeking a legally binding guarantee to keep Arm as a separate entity with a separate business model that is not subject to US intellectual property provisions after Arm is sold from Softbank to Nvidia.

Asked by
Daniel Zeichner (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
2 October 2020
Reference
96921
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport, whether he is seeking a legally binding exemption from Export Administration Regulations or Office of Foreign Assets Control regulations for the sale of ARM from Softbank to Nvidia.

Asked by
Daniel Zeichner (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
2 October 2020
Reference
96922
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, on how many occasions he and his Department have had discussions with (a) Nvidia and (b) Arm on the sale of Arm from Softbank to Nvidia.

Asked by
Daniel Zeichner (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
30 September 2020
Reference
93606
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport, on how many occasions he and his Department have had discussions with (a) Nvidia and (b) Arm on the sale of Arm from Softbank to Nvidia.

Asked by
Daniel Zeichner (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
30 September 2020
Reference
93605
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport, what assessment his Department has made of the national security implications of the Nvidia/Softbank Arm deal.

Asked by
Daniel Zeichner (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
30 September 2020
Reference
95656
House
House of Commons
ARM

To ask the Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport, if he will refer the Nvidia / SoftBank Arm deal to the Competition and Markets Authority under the 2002 Enterprise Act on national security grounds.

Asked by
Daniel Zeichner (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
21 September 2020
Reference
90150
House
House of Commons

I will in a moment. I will make a bit of progress, then I will be happy to take the hon. Gentleman’s questions.

The Enterprise Act 2002 allows the Government to call in transactions on four public interest grounds: financial stability, national security, media plurality and public health emergencies. When a...

Member
Caroline Dinenage (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 September 2020
Reference
680 cc770-1
House
House of Commons

I think that that would depend on which aspect, of the four that are under consideration, the Secretary of State was looking at.

As the hon. Member for Cambridge and others know, the UK is a global leader in tech, with a proud history of innovation and invention. Our world-leading universities,...

Member
Caroline Dinenage (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 September 2020
Reference
680 c772
House
House of Commons

Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Daniel Zeichner
Answering member
Caroline Dinenage
Department
Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport
Type
Adjournment debates
Date
21 September 2020
Reference
680 cc765-773
House
House of Commons

Earlier this evening, BBC Look East reported that this was a debate worth waiting up for, so we surely must not disappoint. I am very grateful for the opportunity to raise an issue vital to my constituency, but also important for the future of the wider UK economy. I declare...

Member
Daniel Zeichner (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 September 2020
Reference
680 c766
House
House of Commons

First, I congratulate the hon. Gentleman on securing this Adjournment debate. I share his concern, as I have a number of high-tech and modern manufacturing companies in my constituency. Does he agree that the proposed sale will be against the national interest and the UK’s ambitions to be a European...

Member
Jim Shannon (Democratic Unionist Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 September 2020
Reference
680 c766
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman anticipates my arguments, because there can be little doubt that this home-grown tech star is a great national asset for the country. Back in 2016, alongside many in Cambridge and across the UK tech sector, I was hugely disappointed to see ARM sold to the Japanese conglomerate...

Member
Daniel Zeichner (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 September 2020
Reference
680 c766
House
House of Commons

I thank my hon. Friend for securing this important debate. Does he agree with me that in assessing the risks of the takeover bid, we need to understand the possible repercussions for British jobs and industry if trade sanctions are put in place by President Trump, for example, as the...

Member
Darren Jones (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 September 2020
Reference
680 c767
House
House of Commons

I thank my hon. Friend the Chair of the Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy Committee. He makes an important point that I will come on to, but I return to the Government’s position, because I find their silence slightly ominous. It has only been breached by briefings to selected journalists...

Member
Daniel Zeichner (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 September 2020
Reference
680 cc767-9
House
House of Commons

rose—

Member
Andrew Griffith (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 September 2020
Reference
680 c769
House
House of Commons

Only of one other Member.

Member
Daniel Zeichner (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 September 2020
Reference
680 c769
House
House of Commons

I am happy.

Member
Caroline Dinenage (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 September 2020
Reference
680 c769
House
House of Commons

Thank you, Mr Speaker. I thank the Minister and I congratulate the hon. Member for Cambridge (Daniel Zeichner) on securing this debate on a subject that is important to his constituents and to all of us. I also congratulate everybody associated with ARM, which is a great British success story...

Member
Andrew Griffith (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 September 2020
Reference
680 cc769-770
House
House of Commons