Skip to main content

1-20 of 1,901 results for subject:Spiking

Type

-
Early day motions (2)
+ Legislation (3) + Acts (1)
-
Public acts (1)
+ Bills (2) + Public bills (2) + Private members' bills (2)
-
Ten minute rule bills (2)
+ Members' contributions (1,737)
-
Business questions (4)
-
Oral answers to questions (19)
+ Oral questions (19)
-
Prime Minister's questions (4)
-
Topical questions (11)
-
Proceeding contributions (1,699)
+ Parliamentary committees (28) + Committee proceedings (12)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (1)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (1)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (4)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (5)
-
Select Committee reports (1)
-
Select Committee reports (Government responses) (1)
-
Select Committee written evidence (18)
+ Parliamentary papers (19)
-
Deposited papers (2)
-
House of Commons papers (14)
-
Impact assessments (2)
-
Unprinted papers (1)
-
White papers (1)
+ Parliamentary proceedings (35) + Debates (31)
-
Adjournment debates (1)
-
Backbench debates (1)
+ Committee proceedings (12)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (1)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (1)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (4)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (5)
-
e-petition debates (1)
+ Legislative debates (18)
-
Debates on bills (17)
-
Debates on delegated legislation (1)
-
Opposition days (2)
+ Statements (4) + Oral statements (2)
-
Ministerial statements (2)
-
Written statements (2)
+ Parliamentary questions (119)
-
Business questions (4)
+ Oral questions (19)
-
Prime Minister's questions (4)
-
Topical questions (11)
-
Written questions (96)
+ Research briefings (7) + Commons Briefing papers (3)
-
Briefing papers on bills (2)
-
Commons Debate packs (4)

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

More

Legislative stage

Legislation

More

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

That this House recognises the growing problem of illegal drug-laced vapes, including those containing the dangerous synthetic cannabinoid Spice, being sold to children via social media platforms; notes with serious concern research conducted by the University of Bath which found that 16.6 percent of vapes confiscated in schools contained Spice;...

Primary sponsor
Wera Hobhouse (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Early day motions
Date
12 February 2026
Reference
2795
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what steps are being taken to improve safety in night clubs especially around spiking.

Asked by
Jim Shannon (Democratic Unionist Party)
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
20 January 2026
Reference
104677
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many people have been convicted of spiking in each of the last five years.

Asked by
Lee Anderson (Reform UK)
Answering body
Ministry of Justice
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
22 December 2025
Reference
100417
House
House of Commons

Lords committee stage fifth day. Clauses 82 to 84 agreed to. New clauses agreed to. Schedule 9, as amended, agreed to. Clauses 85 and 86 agreed to. (Part 1 of 2).

Lead member
Lord Hanson of Flint; Baroness Levitt
Answering member
Lord Davies of Gower; Lord Cameron of Lochiel
Department
Home Office; Ministry of Justice
Type
Debates on bills; Committee of the Whole House (HL)
Notes
Northern Ireland legislative consent granted, Scottish and Welsh legislative consent sought.
Date
9 December 2025
Reference
851 cc106-190
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Davies of Gower

289: Clause 82, page 98, leave out lines 3 to 11

Member’s explanatory statement

This amendment removes the ability of the court to dismiss an action in respect of personal injuries attributable to child sexual abuse on the grounds that the defendant would suffer substantial prejudice.

Member
Lord Davies of Gower (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 December 2025
Reference
851 c117
House
House of Lords

My Lords, Amendment 289 is a probing amendment through which I am seeking the Government’s justification for the substantial prejudice provision in Clause 82. By way of background, Clause 82 removes the three-year limitation period for personal injury claims in cases relating to child sexual abuse. As such, it implements...

Member
Lord Davies of Gower (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 December 2025
Reference
851 cc117-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I have an amendment in this group. I repeat a declaration of interest I made at Second Reading: that I have appeared as a barrister in a number of the leading cases about limitation of the law of tort. The purpose of limitation periods is to give a...

Member
Lord Faulks (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 December 2025
Reference
851 cc118-108
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I have signed Amendment 289. This is the first opportunity I have had to speak in Committee because of family illness, and it is good to be back.

In a previous group of amendments last week, the Committee heard the concerns of a number of Peers worried that the...

Member
Baroness Brinton (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 December 2025
Reference
851 cc120-1
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I think we all welcome the concept of Clause 82, because it provides a significant step forward towards justice for survivors of child sexual abuse. By removing the limitation period, the provision acknowledges the unique barriers facing victims in coming forward after many years of abuse.

Let us be...

Member
Lord Blencathra (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 December 2025
Reference
851 cc110-122
House
House of Lords

My Lords, on these Benches we recognise the purpose of time limits and we recognise the right to fair trial, but survivors of child sexual abuse should not be barred from justice simply by the passage of time. The difficulty lies, of course, in striking that balance. At the moment,...

Member
Baroness Doocey (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 December 2025
Reference
851 c122
House
House of Lords

I add my voice to what has been said by the noble Baroness, Lady Doocey, and the noble Lord, Lord Faulks. The fundamental principle is set out in new Section 11ZB(2): if the defendant cannot have a fair trial, the hearing cannot proceed. The gravity of the allegations and the...

Member
Lord Pannick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 December 2025
Reference
851 c122
House
House of Lords

My Lords, before I speak to Amendment 289, I thank my noble friend Lady Royall, who is not in her place today because she is ill, and Mr Stephen Bernard, both of whom met me recently. We discussed both the impact of the limitation period on victims and survivors of...

Member
Baroness Levitt (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 December 2025
Reference
851 cc122-3
House
House of Lords

The noble Baroness is quite right that the response to IICSA came from the previous Government. It was written by the Ministry of Justice and signed by the noble and learned Lord, Lord Bellamy. While not in any way undermining his contribution to whatever was produced, I suspect that it...

Member
Lord Faulks (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 December 2025
Reference
851 c123
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it is no answer to say that another Government considered it carefully: different Governments have different priorities. I am not sure that that is going to come as a great surprise to the noble Lord. As for Section 33, this Government are satisfied that it does not provide...

Member
Baroness Levitt (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 December 2025
Reference
851 c124
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I shall be very brief in my response. As I say, this was a probing amendment, and I am grateful to those noble Lords who have contributed to this short debate. I thank the Minister for her clarification. I am content with the Government’s assurances, and I therefore...

Member
Lord Davies of Gower (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 December 2025
Reference
851 c114
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Baroness Bertin

290: After Clause 82, insert the following new Clause—

“Amendment of Protection of Children Act 1978

(1) The Protection of Children Act 1978 is amended as follows.

(2) In section 1(1)(a) (indecent photographs of children) after “child” insert “or a person who appears to be or is implied to be a...

Member
Baroness Bertin (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 December 2025
Reference
851 cc115-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I shall speak also to Amendments 291, 292, 298 and 314 in my name and supported by my friends the noble Baronesses, Lady Kennedy, Lady Kidron and Lady Benjamin, and the noble Lord, Lord Clement-Jones. These amendments have the support of many charities, including Barnardo’s, the Internet Watch...

Member
Baroness Bertin (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 December 2025
Reference
851 cc116-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I have put my name to Amendments 290, 291 and 314. I also support Amendments 292 and 298 in this group, all in the name of the noble Baroness, Lady Bertin, whom I hold in high esteem.

Before I set out some remarks in support of these amendments, it...

Member
Baroness Benjamin (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 December 2025
Reference
851 cc129-131
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it is a privilege to follow the noble Baroness, Lady Benjamin. I share much of her frustration about us being here discussing this again and hearing that litany of powerful images—that I would rather unhear—from the noble Baroness, Lady Bertin. I do not propose to add to them,...

Member
Baroness Kidron (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 December 2025
Reference
851 cc130-3
House
House of Lords

My Lords, when I became a practitioner at the Bar as a young woman in the late 1970s, freedom of expression was regularly used as the excuse to justify sometimes horrific porn. When there were discussions about this among lawyers, it was almost invariably said that women were being prudish...

Member
Baroness Kennedy of the Shaws (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 December 2025
Reference
851 cc133-5
House
House of Lords