Skip to main content

1-20 of 21,104 results for subject:Subsidies

Type

-
Early day motions (71)
+ Legislation (336) + Acts (10)
-
Public acts (10)
+ Bills (17)
-
Hybrid bills (1)
+ Public bills (16)
-
Government bills (10)
+ Private members' bills (6)
-
Presentation bills (3)
-
Ten minute rule bills (3)
+ Delegated legislation (309)
-
Statutory instruments (309)
+ Members' contributions (13,213)
-
Business questions (78)
-
Maiden speeches (25)
-
Oral answers to questions (1,355)
-
Oral question time interventions (12)
+ Oral questions (1,418)
-
Prime Minister's questions (51)
-
Topical questions (81)
-
Points of order (6)
-
Proceeding contributions (10,426)
+ Parliamentary committees (389) + Committee proceedings (197)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HC) (2)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (11)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (38)
-
European Committee proceedings (21)
-
Grand Committee proceedings (HC) (4)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (39)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (77)
-
Select Committee reports (121)
-
Select Committee reports (Government responses) (33)
-
Select Committee written evidence (43)
+ Parliamentary papers (706)
-
Annual reports (6)
-
Command papers (19)
-
Consultation papers (93)
-
Consultation papers (Government responses) (2)
-
Deposited papers (389)
-
House of Commons papers (238)
-
House of Lords papers (28)
-
Impact assessments (16)
-
Proposed negative statutory instruments (5)
-
Treaties (2)
-
Unprinted papers (17)
-
White papers (1)
+ Parliamentary proceedings (923) + Debates (492)
-
Adjournment debates (81)
-
Backbench debates (10)
+ Committee proceedings (197)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HC) (2)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (11)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (38)
-
European Committee proceedings (21)
-
Grand Committee proceedings (HC) (4)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (39)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (77)
-
Debates on select committee reports (21)
-
e-petition debates (3)
-
Estimates days (5)
+ Legislative debates (181)
-
Debates on bills (104)
-
Debates on delegated legislation (77)
+ Monarch's speech debates (5)
-
Queen's speech debates (5)
-
Opposition days (19)
-
Questions for short debate (31)
+ Formal proceedings (6)
-
Non-legislative formal proceedings (6)
+ Petitions and observations (4)
-
Observations on petitions (2)
-
Paper petitions (2)
-
Private notice questions (1)
+ Statements (374) + Oral statements (50)
-
Business statements (1)
-
Ministerial statements (47)
-
Select Committee statements (1)
-
Written statements (324)
-
Urgent questions (4)
+ Written corrections (5)
-
Ministerial corrections (5)
+ Parliamentary questions (7,329)
-
Business questions (78)
+ Oral questions (1,418)
-
Prime Minister's questions (51)
-
Topical questions (81)
-
Private notice questions (1)
-
Urgent questions (4)
-
Written questions (5,828)
+ Petitions and observations (4)
-
Observations on petitions (2)
-
Paper petitions (2)
+ Research briefings (63) + Commons Briefing papers (43)
-
Briefing papers on bills (3)
-
Commons Debate packs (10)
+ Lords Library Briefings (3)
-
Lords Library Briefings - Bills (2)
-
Lords Library Briefings - Debates (1)
-
POSTbriefs (1)
-
POSTnotes (6)

House

Session

Year

Department

More

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

More

Legislative stage

Legislation

More

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask His Majesty's Government to what extent the differential in farm payments between farmers in England and those in Scotland is affecting the competitive position of the former.

Asked by
Baroness McIntosh of Pickering (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
18 September 2026
Reference
HL3189
House
House of Lords

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, with reference to Note 27 of her Department’s 2025/26 annual accounts, what estimate she has made of the level of public subsidy to rail services in each of the next five years.

Asked by
Priti Patel (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
15 September 2026
Reference
27435
House
House of Commons
Laid by
Secretary Angela Eagle
Department
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
Type
Annual reports; Unprinted papers
Date
15 September 2026
House
House of Commons; House of Lords

To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the level of public subsidy provided to the Bee Network in Greater Manchester.

Asked by
Lord Bridges of Headley (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
9 September 2026
Reference
HL2494
House
House of Lords

I am keen not to be seen as a support act to the noble Lord, Lord Moylan, although some of my remarks might echo points that he made in the previous group.

Amendment 15 would place on Great British Railways a duty to act as a single employer for the staff...

Member
Lord Davies of Brixton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 cc220-1GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will principally refer to my Amendment 19 in this group. I apologise to the noble Lord, Lord Davies of Brixton, that I am not really in a position to comment on the points he makes,

but I think the discussion we had previously about the corporate and...

Member
Lord Lansley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 cc221-3GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I welcome these probing amendments and look forward to the Minister’s response to some very important general issues. It is right that the staff in all the operating companies that will be affected by this should have an early idea from the Government about what is planned for...

Member
Lord Redwood (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 cc223-4GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will speak to Amendment 305 in this group. Noble Lords may think that Amendment 305 is a long way away from where we started in this group, but it is here. My amendment refers to Clause 87, which provides for a charge for removing road vehicles from...

Member
Lord Berkeley (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 c224GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will start by referring to the amendment that the noble Lord, Lord Berkeley, talked to, because it just so happened that, as I was travelling to London yesterday, a car struck a bridge at Burnham. I see that the noble Lord, Lord Faulkner, is nodding; perhaps he...

Member
Lord Harper (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 cc225-7GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, my Amendments 20 and 110 would require Great British Railways to increase passengers on the railways and to set a passenger target, rather like the freight target, which has just been referred to. One could easily argue that this is not necessary, as any Government will want the...

Member
Baroness Pidgeon (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 cc226-8GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank noble Lords for these amendments and the noble Lords, Lord Redwood and Lord Harper, for their contributions.

I start with Amendment 7, which would introduce a purpose for GBR into the Bill. The Bill already provides a purpose for GBR, just as we promised the Liberal Democrats...

Member
Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 cc228-9GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, if the Minister would be so good, this really is very important. I did not think he would adopt that approach, but it is one of the two approaches I offered him, and he has chosen to adopt that which says that this is essentially hierarchical, so that...

Member
Lord Moylan (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 cc229-230GC
House
House of Lords

I thank the noble Lord for that. I am at least clear about this. The functions are more like powers; the duties are the things that GBR must do when doing the functions, but it is not limited to those general functions. Indeed, we have already discussed quite extensively what...

Member
Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 cc230-1GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, my noble friend is talking about standards created by GBR. Can he explain the relationship between what GBR does and the Rail Safety and Standards Board?

Member
Lord Berkeley (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 c231GC
House
House of Lords

I thank my noble friend. I think I can. The RSSB, the Rail Safety and Standards Board, creates standards applicable across the railway generally on some subjects, whereas there are a number of more technical standards—for example, for pieces of machinery, trains and railway infrastructure—which GBR, as a successor to...

Member
Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 cc231-2GC
House
House of Lords

That just begs the question of why in Clause 70—perhaps we can discuss it before we arrive at that point—Great British Railways has been taken out of the definition of being an infrastructure manager for the purposes of access rights under the 2000 regulations.

While I have the Committee’s attention for...

Member
Lord Lansley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 cc232-3GC
House
House of Lords

It is not very well drafted at all, is it?

Member
Lord Berkeley (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 c233GC
House
House of Lords

I refute that comment, for the avoidance of doubt and for the record.

The noble Lord is correct. It is an important distinction. As I said, let me meet him on that. He referred to Clause 70. I am not equipped to go into that just now, as he will appreciate,...

Member
Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 cc233-4GC
House
House of Lords

Before the noble Lord moves on, he has not really addressed the point that I made, which is that in Clause 18 there is a perverse incentive that somebody coming in with a different mindset from many of us in this Room could reduce the frequency of trains and hike...

Member
Baroness Pidgeon (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 c234GC
House
House of Lords

The obligations placed on GBR by the long-term rail strategy, and the consequent approval by the Secretary of State of the business plan, should adequately deter Great British Railways from seeking to achieve that by diminishing services. Indeed, there was an example in the franchising era of the Government being...

Member
Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 cc234-5GC
House
House of Lords