Skip to main content

1-20 of 21,008 results for subject:Subsidies

Type

-
Early day motions (71)
+ Legislation (336) + Acts (10)
-
Public acts (10)
+ Bills (17)
-
Hybrid bills (1)
+ Public bills (16)
-
Government bills (10)
+ Private members' bills (6)
-
Presentation bills (3)
-
Ten minute rule bills (3)
+ Delegated legislation (309)
-
Statutory instruments (309)
+ Members' contributions (13,119)
-
Business questions (78)
-
Maiden speeches (25)
-
Oral answers to questions (1,355)
-
Oral question time interventions (12)
+ Oral questions (1,418)
-
Prime Minister's questions (51)
-
Topical questions (81)
-
Points of order (6)
-
Proceeding contributions (10,332)
+ Parliamentary committees (388) + Committee proceedings (196)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HC) (2)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (11)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (38)
-
European Committee proceedings (21)
-
Grand Committee proceedings (HC) (4)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (39)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (77)
-
Select Committee reports (121)
-
Select Committee reports (Government responses) (33)
-
Select Committee written evidence (43)
+ Parliamentary papers (705)
-
Annual reports (5)
-
Command papers (19)
-
Consultation papers (93)
-
Consultation papers (Government responses) (2)
-
Deposited papers (389)
-
House of Commons papers (238)
-
House of Lords papers (28)
-
Impact assessments (16)
-
Proposed negative statutory instruments (5)
-
Treaties (2)
-
Unprinted papers (16)
-
White papers (1)
+ Parliamentary proceedings (922) + Debates (491)
-
Adjournment debates (81)
-
Backbench debates (10)
+ Committee proceedings (196)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HC) (2)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (11)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (38)
-
European Committee proceedings (21)
-
Grand Committee proceedings (HC) (4)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (39)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (77)
-
Debates on select committee reports (21)
-
e-petition debates (3)
-
Estimates days (5)
+ Legislative debates (180)
-
Debates on bills (103)
-
Debates on delegated legislation (77)
+ Monarch's speech debates (5)
-
Queen's speech debates (5)
-
Opposition days (19)
-
Questions for short debate (31)
+ Formal proceedings (6)
-
Non-legislative formal proceedings (6)
+ Petitions and observations (4)
-
Observations on petitions (2)
-
Paper petitions (2)
-
Private notice questions (1)
+ Statements (374) + Oral statements (50)
-
Business statements (1)
-
Ministerial statements (47)
-
Select Committee statements (1)
-
Written statements (324)
-
Urgent questions (4)
+ Written corrections (5)
-
Ministerial corrections (5)
+ Parliamentary questions (7,329)
-
Business questions (78)
+ Oral questions (1,418)
-
Prime Minister's questions (51)
-
Topical questions (81)
-
Private notice questions (1)
-
Urgent questions (4)
-
Written questions (5,828)
+ Petitions and observations (4)
-
Observations on petitions (2)
-
Paper petitions (2)
+ Research briefings (63) + Commons Briefing papers (43)
-
Briefing papers on bills (3)
-
Commons Debate packs (10)
+ Lords Library Briefings (3)
-
Lords Library Briefings - Bills (2)
-
Lords Library Briefings - Debates (1)
-
POSTbriefs (1)
-
POSTnotes (6)

House

Session

Year

Department

More

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

More

Legislative stage

Legislation

More

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the level of public subsidy provided to the Bee Network in Greater Manchester.

Asked by
Lord Bridges of Headley (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Type
Written questions
Status
Tabled
Date
22 July 2026
Reference
HL2494
House
House of Lords

Motion that this House has considered the impact of the Peak Cluster Pipeline and project. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Esther McVey
Answering member
Michael Shanks
Department
Department for Energy Security and Net Zero
Type
Debates
Date
15 July 2026
Reference
789 cc379-388WH
House
House of Commons

I beg to move,

That this House has considered the impact of the Peak Cluster Pipeline and project.

It is a pleasure to serve under your chairmanship, Sir Roger.

It is good to see the Minister in his place. I hope to get some meaningful answers from him today on this project; up...

Member
Esther McVey (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 July 2026
Reference
789 c379WH
House
House of Commons

I fully support the right hon. Lady’s efforts on behalf of her constituents. I have an understanding of the issues. Does she agree that any final approval for the Peak Cluster project must include cast-iron, legally binding guarantees to protect landowners’ rights, and that local environmental objections and community safety...

Member
Jim Shannon (Democratic Unionist Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 July 2026
Reference
789 c379WH
House
House of Commons

I agree, but none of that has been forthcoming to the public, no matter how hard they have tried, and the public do not want the project. Right across the region, there have been demonstrations and councils have voted against it. At a recent public meeting in Byley, close to...

Member
Esther McVey (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 July 2026
Reference
789 cc379-380WH
House
House of Commons

The North Sea Transition Authority deals with many private sector companies around oil and gas drilling. I agree that it is a public quango, but surely the right hon. Member agrees that it does not have responsibility for what Shell or BP do in the North sea any more than...

Member
Andrew Cooper (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 July 2026
Reference
789 c380WH
House
House of Commons

I thank my neighbour for asking that question. If he listens to the rest of the debate, he will see that this is not a private project; it has deep structural and financial ties to, and sign-off by, the Government. It is not, as he wrongly refers to it, a...

Member
Esther McVey (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 July 2026
Reference
789 cc380-2WH
House
House of Commons

It is a pleasure to serve under your chairship, Sir Roger, although the debate has probably not been conducted in the best way to discuss this topic. I draw the attention of the right hon. Member for Tatton (Esther McVey) to the recent Adjournment debate secured by her colleague the...

Member
Michael Shanks (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 July 2026
Reference
789 c382WH
House
House of Commons

That is not what I said at all, Sir Roger. The debate has been perfectly in order, but I do not think the public watching will have got much from it. That is my assessment and, I am sure, the assessment of many others watching. As I was saying, I...

Member
Michael Shanks (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 July 2026
Reference
789 c382WH
House
House of Commons

Will the Minister give way?

Member
Esther McVey (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 July 2026
Reference
789 c382WH
House
House of Commons

No, I will not just now, because the right hon. Lady has just given a speech. I will respond to some of her points.

Member
Michael Shanks (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 July 2026
Reference
789 c382WH
House
House of Commons

Then don’t be so dismissive!

Member
Esther McVey (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 July 2026
Reference
789 c382WH
House
House of Commons

Let me respond to the right hon. Lady’s points. She has now accused me twice in this House of being “elusive” and of “obfuscation”. I have answered every single one of her written parliamentary questions. I am not responsible for the fact that she may or may not like the...

Member
Michael Shanks (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 July 2026
Reference
789 cc382-4WH
House
House of Commons

Will the Minister give way?

Member
Esther McVey (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 July 2026
Reference
789 c384WH
House
House of Commons

I will give way in just a second. The right hon. Lady’s point about the NSIP regime was quite wrong. Decisions are made based on applications that are submitted, but no application has been submitted. They are based on all the facts, including the community engagement that takes place—I will...

Member
Michael Shanks (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 July 2026
Reference
789 c384WH
House
House of Commons

Can the Minister confirm that the final sign-off on this project, via a development consent order, will be done by the Secretary of State for Energy—by, in other words, the Government? Is that true or false?

Member
Esther McVey (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 July 2026
Reference
789 c384WH
House
House of Commons

I think I just said that the nationally significant infrastructure project regime exists so that decisions can be made at a national level by different Secretaries of State. In this case, it is an energy project, so yes, the decision will be made by the Secretary of State for Energy....

Member
Michael Shanks (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 July 2026
Reference
789 c384WH
House
House of Commons

Will the Minister give way on another inaccurate piece of information?

Member
Esther McVey (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 July 2026
Reference
789 c384WH
House
House of Commons

Will the Minister give way?

Member
Sarah Russell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 July 2026
Reference
789 c384WH
House
House of Commons

I will give way to my hon. Friend.

Member
Michael Shanks (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 July 2026
Reference
789 c384WH
House
House of Commons