Skip to main content

1-20 of 22 results for subject:Teesport

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Laid by
Secretary Louise Haigh
Department
Department for Transport
Type
Statutory instruments
Date
12 September 2024
Reference
SI 2024/934
House
House of Commons; House of Lords
Type
Select Committee reports; House of Commons papers; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Business and Trade Committee
Date
23 April 2024
Reference
HC 272 2023-24
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, whether exiting statutory powers are in place to direct the Tees Port Authority to site an accommodation barge on the River Tees.

Asked by
Alex Cunningham (Labour)
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
5 July 2023
Reference
191917
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, if he will make an assessment of trends in the level of demand for shipping services from Teesport to Zeebrugge in the logistics sector.

Asked by
Andy McDonald (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
2 March 2023
Reference
153784
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, if he will make an estimate of the number of seafarer jobs that were supported by each shipping activity in Teesport in each year since 2015.

Asked by
Andy McDonald (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
2 March 2023
Reference
153785
House
House of Commons

Westminster Hall adjournment debate on upgrading rail links to and from Teesport.

Lead member
Ashok Kumar
Answering member
Tom Harris
Department
Department for Transport
Type
Adjournment debates
Date
27 February 2007
Reference
457 c249-54WH
House
House of Commons

I congratulate my hon. Friend the Member for Middlesbrough, South and East Cleveland (Dr. Kumar) on securing this debate and providing an opportunity for the House to debate rail links to Teesport. He finished his speech by appealing for a positive response from me. In recent weeks I have been...

Member
Tom Harris (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 February 2007
Reference
457 c251-4WH
House
House of Commons

First, I thank Mr. Speaker for granting me this Adjournment debate, in which I wish to raise the current situation relating to the urgent need to upgrade rail links to and from Teesport. It is at the heart of the case for the development of the Teesport complex and for...

Member
Ashok Kumar (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 February 2007
Reference
457 c249-51WH
House
House of Commons

Application documents, maps and plans.

Type
Transport and Works Act order applications
Date
26 May 2006
Reference
TW 175 Commons & Lords Libraries
Lead member
Lord Darling of Roulanish
Department
Department for Transport
Type
Observations on petitions
Date
9 January 2006
House
House of Commons

Public petition from the Redcar business association and the Redcar road west action group supporting a proposal by PD Teesport to develop a deep-sea container terminal to expand Tees Port and generate employment. (Circulated with the Vote for 15 December 2005)

Lead member
Vera Baird
Type
Paper petitions
Date
13 December 2005
Reference
440 c1275
House
House of Commons

This is the petition of the Redcar business association and the Redcar road west action group, the latter being a grass-roots group of people in the former steel town of South Bank in my constituency. Petitions on this subject have been signed by 810 people. They support a proposal by...

Member
Vera Baird (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 December 2005
Reference
440 c1275
House
House of Commons
What assessment he has made of the effects on regeneration in the Tees valley of port expansion at Teesport.
Asked by
Vera Baird (Labour)
Answering body
Office of the Deputy Prime Minister
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
6 July 2005
Reference
436 c285; 9713
House
House of Commons
Mr. Speaker, as you know, my right hon. Friend the Deputy Prime Minister is unable to be present at Deputy Prime Minister questions today, as he will be representing my right hon. Friend the Prime Minister at Prime Minister's questions. [Interruption.] I am sure that my right hon. Friend the Deputy Prime Minister will be pleased to hear the welcome that he receives even before he arrives in the Chamber. I can tell my hon. and learned Friend the Member for Redcar (Vera Baird) that the northern way action plan launched in Gateshead on 20 June sets out clearly the wider economic benefits that would flow from the development of the facilities at Teesport—for the Tees valley, the north and the UK as a whole.
Answered by
Jim Fitzpatrick (Labour)
Answering body
Office of the Deputy Prime Minister
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
6 July 2005
Reference
436 c285
House
House of Commons
I hope that my hon. and learned Friend and the House will understand that I cannot pre-empt or comment on specific planning proposals. However, I am confident that Teesport has a strong future supporting international trade and regional regeneration. I note that the urban regeneration company Tees Valley Regeneration has a successful 6 Jul 2005 : Column 286 track record, having spearheaded the creation of more than 12,000 jobs and inward investment of over £500 million over the past eight years. I note too that she and other colleagues are expecting to meet my hon. Friend the Minister of State, Department for Transport later this month. I am sure that they will continue to press the case for Teesport as effectively as they have done already.
Answered by
Jim Fitzpatrick (Labour)
Answering body
Office of the Deputy Prime Minister
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
6 July 2005
Reference
436 c285-6
House
House of Commons
The forthcoming review of ports policy by my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Transport will address the key questions relating to port capacity and future port development, and the wider issues. They include environmental factors, local regeneration, productivity and the role of ports in our overall transport strategy.
Answered by
Jim Fitzpatrick (Labour)
Answering body
Office of the Deputy Prime Minister
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
6 July 2005
Reference
436 c286
House
House of Commons
I thank my hon. Friend for that answer. The project is indeed a big one, capable of generating around 7,000 jobs in a sub-region where unemployment is still twice the national average. Is he aware that similar applications for port expansion at Felixtowe, Harwich and London could have a major impact on the viability of Teesport's proposals? Will he confirm that our interests will be part of the context in which those applications are considered? Will he do his level best to help us to help ourselves to get a thriving deep-water container port at Teesport, and a huge economic boost for the Tees valley?
Asked by
Vera Baird (Labour)
Answering body
Office of the Deputy Prime Minister
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
6 July 2005
Reference
436 c285-6
House
House of Commons
There remains an output gap of £29 billion between the north and the rest of the UK. The south-east economy is considered to be overheating, so does my hon. Friend agree that the development of a deep-sea container port at Teesport would be an important step towards closing the north-south divide?
Asked by
Dari Taylor (Labour)
Answering body
Office of the Deputy Prime Minister
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
6 July 2005
Reference
436 c286
House
House of Commons

I thank the hon. Gentleman for that intervention. It seems to me imperative that, rather than looking individually at the three current applications and responding to them on the semi-local basis on which they would normally be dealt with, the Government should them aside for the time being while a...

Member
Vera Baird (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 May 2005
Reference
434 c897-8
House
House of Commons

Westminster Hall adjournment debate on freight transport in the Tees Valley.

Lead member
Ashok Kumar
Answering member
Charlotte Atkins
Department
Department for Transport
Type
Adjournment debates
Date
1 March 2005
Reference
431 c247-52WH
House
House of Commons