Skip to main content

1-100 of 17,902 results for subject:Testing

Type

-
Early day motions (51)
+ Legislation (352) + Acts (12)
-
Public acts (12)
+ Bills (34) + Public bills (34)
-
Consolidation bills (1)
-
Government bills (5)
+ Private members' bills (28)
-
Ballot bills (5)
-
Presentation bills (7)
-
Private members' bills (HL) (2)
-
Ten minute rule bills (14)
+ Delegated legislation (306) + Statutory instruments (306)
-
Deregulation orders (3)
+ Members' contributions (9,688)
-
Business questions (52)
-
Maiden speeches (8)
-
Oral answers to questions (572)
-
Oral question time interventions (3)
+ Oral questions (590)
-
Prime Minister's questions (50)
-
Topical questions (33)
-
Points of order (6)
-
Proceeding contributions (8,518)
+ Parliamentary committees (277) + Committee proceedings (155)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (22)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (31)
-
European Committee proceedings (11)
-
Grand Committee proceedings (HC) (1)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (47)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (33)
-
Select Committee reports (61)
-
Select Committee reports (Government responses) (22)
-
Select Committee written evidence (46)
+ Parliamentary papers (874)
-
Annual reports (8)
-
Command papers (25)
-
Consultation papers (75)
-
Consultation papers (Government responses) (9)
-
Deposited papers (586)
-
House of Commons papers (169)
-
House of Lords papers (15)
-
Impact assessments (82)
-
Proposed negative statutory instruments (13)
-
Treaties (9)
-
Unprinted command papers (1)
+ Unprinted papers (9)
-
Draft deregulation orders (proposal) (3)
-
White papers (1)
+ Parliamentary proceedings (748) + Debates (383)
-
Adjournment debates (63)
-
Backbench debates (7)
+ Committee proceedings (155)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (22)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (31)
-
European Committee proceedings (11)
-
Grand Committee proceedings (HC) (1)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (47)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (33)
-
Debates on select committee reports (1)
-
e-petition debates (4)
-
Emergency debate applications (2)
+ Legislative debates (228)
-
Debates on bills (150)
-
Debates on delegated legislation (78)
+ Monarch's speech debates (2)
-
Queen's speech debates (2)
-
Opposition days (1)
-
Questions for short debate (13)
+ Petitions and observations (6)
-
Observations on petitions (2)
-
Paper petitions (4)
-
Private notice questions (3)
+ Statements (338) + Oral statements (58)
-
Business statements (1)
-
Ministerial statements (55)
-
Select Committee statements (1)
-
Written statements (280)
-
Urgent questions (6)
+ Written corrections (7)
-
Ministerial corrections (6)
-
Other corrections (1)
+ Parliamentary questions (6,809)
-
Business questions (52)
+ Oral questions (590)
-
Prime Minister's questions (50)
-
Topical questions (33)
-
Private notice questions (3)
-
Urgent questions (6)
-
Written questions (6,158)
+ Petitions and observations (6)
-
Observations on petitions (2)
-
Paper petitions (4)
+ Research briefings (43) + Commons Briefing papers (19)
-
Briefing papers on bills (2)
-
Commons Debate packs (10)
+ Lords Library Briefings (3)
-
Lords Library Briefings - Bills (2)
-
POSTnotes (11)

House

Session

Year

Department

More

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

More

Legislative stage

Legislation

More

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask His Majesty's Government, in light of representations from nuclear test veterans involved in intelligence gathering of foreign nations' atmospheric nuclear tests, what progress they have made in extending the eligibility criteria for the Nuclear Test Medal to include those from 543 Squadron and 27 Squadron who recovered, washed, decontaminated,...

Asked by
Lord Bourne of Aberystwyth (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
26 October 2026
Reference
HL3925
House
House of Lords

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, what assessment her Department has made of the potential merits of investing in alternative and supplementary diagnostic methods for bovine TB, as a means of reducing reliance on the single intradermal comparative cervical tuberculin (SICCT) skin test; and...

Asked by
David Chadwick (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
22 October 2026
Reference
35697
House
House of Commons

To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the level of use of ionophores in the production of imported poultry, pig, cattle and fish products; what limits are set on residues; and what tests are carried out to check for residue or antimicrobial resistance.

Asked by
Baroness Bennett of Manor Castle (Green Party)
Answering body
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
Type
Written questions
Status
Tabled
Date
22 October 2026
Reference
HL4411
House
House of Lords

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, pursuant to the answer of 19 October 2026 to question 33724 on Russia: Telecommunications cables, what progress he has made on increasing the testing of uncrewed underwater vehicles to a) protect UK critical national infrastructure and b) deter undersea threats.

Asked by
Ben Obese-Jecty (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Tabled
Date
22 October 2026
Reference
37301
House
House of Commons

To ask His Majesty's Government whether they plan to make random drug testing mandatory for the drivers of (1) taxi and private hire vehicles, (2) commercial vehicles, and (3) buses and coaches, in light of the number of serious accidents caused by those driving under the influence of drugs.

Asked by
Lord Wasserman (Non-affiliated)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
21 October 2026
Reference
HL4013
House
House of Lords

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what discussions she has had with the Civil Aviation Authority on the adequacy and testing of NATS contingency arrangements for a failure of its flight processing systems.

Asked by
Alison Griffiths (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
21 October 2026
Reference
34766
House
House of Commons

To ask His Majesty's Government what steps they are taking to ensure that access to NHS sight tests under the general ophthalmic services arrangements remain nationally standardised and not subject to local variation.

Asked by
Baroness Redfern (Conservative)
Answering body
Department of Health and Social Care
Type
Written questions
Status
Tabled
Date
21 October 2026
Reference
HL4398
House
House of Lords

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, how many and which food supplements have been tested by the Food Standards Agency in each of the last three a) calendar and b) financial years.

Asked by
Caroline Johnson (Conservative)
Answering body
Department of Health and Social Care
Type
Written questions
Status
Tabled
Date
21 October 2026
Reference
37061
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, what testing for the presence of campylo bacteria the Environment Agency carries out in (a) river and (b) sea water in Christchurch; and when the last positive test was.

Asked by
Christopher Chope (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
20 October 2026
Reference
34729
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what steps she is taking to increase the uptake of free eye tests.

Asked by
Scott Arthur (Labour)
Answering body
Department of Health and Social Care
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
19 October 2026
Reference
30665
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what assessment she has made of the effectiveness of the MOT test in identifying vehicles that are louder than the law allows.

Asked by
Lisa Smart (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
16 October 2026
Reference
32985
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what assessment he has made of the potential merits of a financial compensation scheme for (a) nuclear test veterans present during the nuclear testing programme from 1952 to 1967 and (b) their families.

Asked by
Llinos Medi (Plaid Cymru)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
16 October 2026
Reference
30964
House
House of Commons

To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, what assessment she has made of the risk that voluntary pre-deployment access will not be granted for open-weight models developed outside United Kingdom; and what mitigations are in place.

Asked by
Ben Spencer (Conservative)
Answering body
Cabinet Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
16 October 2026
Reference
33317
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, if he will place in the Library of the House of Commons a copy of the seven page report of recommendations produced as a result of his department's recent review of nuclear test veteran historical record, which was published in July.

Asked by
John Hayes (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
15 October 2026
Reference
29094
House
House of Commons

There is much interest from aerospace companies in the 1950s Blue Streak launch facilities at RAF Spadeadam in my constituency. What assessment has been made of the potential of UK sites for developing heavy-lift rocket testing in the UK, and will the Minister meet me to discuss the potential of Spadeadam?

Asked by
Julie Minns (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Business and Trade
Topical questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
15 October 2026
Reference
791 c531
House
House of Commons

Spadeadam is, of course, another amazing facility that I have visited in recent years. My hon. Friend is quite right: there is the potential there, and I agree that a full assessment of that potential must be made, alongside that of our other launch facility in the Shetland Islands.

Answered by
Chris McDonald (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Business and Trade
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
15 October 2026
Reference
791 c531
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, pursuant to the Answer of 9 September 2026 to Question 26159 on Speed Limits: Cameras, on what date testing of the Home Office-approved solution commenced; when she expects that testing to conclude; and when she expects implementation across all affected...

Asked by
Greg Smith (Conservative)
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
14 October 2026
Reference
29510
House
House of Commons

To ask His Majesty's Government what proportion of the underlying tests for all 4,658 surface water bodies in England meet the requirement for good ecological status.

Asked by
Baroness Coffey (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
Type
Written questions
Status
Tabled
Date
14 October 2026
Reference
HL4085
House
House of Lords

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, whether she has considered introducing a mandatory vehicle noise test as part of the MOT; and what steps she is taking to tackle excessive vehicle noise.

Asked by
Dan Aldridge (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
13 October 2026
Reference
33457
House
House of Commons

Lords motion to consider. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Lord Wilson of Sedgefield
Answering member
Lord Jamieson
Department
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
Type
Debates on delegated legislation
Notes
Debated with motion to consider the Hazards in Social Housing (Prescribed Requirements) (England) (Amendment) Regulations 2026.
Date
13 October 2026
Reference
860 cc93-101GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the Committee will also consider the Hazards in Social Housing (Prescribed Requirements) (England) (Amendment) Regulations 2026, otherwise known as the second phase of Awaab’s law. This Government are determined to drive a lasting change in the safety and quality of social housing. These draft regulations play an important...

Member
Lord Wilson of Sedgefield (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2026
Reference
860 cc93-5GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I first draw the attention of the Grand Committee to the fact that I am a counsellor for a local authority that owns social housing, so this is something close to my heart.

First, on the issue of social housing regulations for hazards and the extension of Awaab’s law,...

Member
Baroness Pinnock (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2026
Reference
860 cc95-6GC
House
House of Lords

I thank the Minister for bringing forward these regulations. I will speak first to the electrical safety ones, which are largely a technical amendment to reflect other changes to regulation. Landlords do have that duty, and they will continue to have that duty.

First, I have some issues about monitoring the...

Member
Lord Jamieson (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2026
Reference
860 cc96-8GC
House
House of Lords

I thank the noble Lord and the noble Baroness for the contributions. I am pleased to know that we have cross-party and cross-House support for all this. Some valid questions have been asked that I will try my best to address. If I cannot, I have no problem with writing...

Member
Lord Wilson of Sedgefield (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2026
Reference
860 cc98-9GC
House
House of Lords

There is an issue that I am quite concerned about, particularly relating to gas checks. If a tenant refuses access and a gas appliance, such as a fire or a boiler, has not been serviced for, say, five years and causes a fire or an explosion, whose responsibility would it...

Member
Baroness Pinnock (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2026
Reference
860 c99GC
House
House of Lords

As I have said, the Government are well aware of these issues and are looking at concerns regarding the legal framework. I will write to the noble Baroness about exactly where the Government are on all this, what the legal position is and what we are looking at.

Member
Lord Wilson of Sedgefield (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2026
Reference
860 c99GC
House
House of Lords

I just want to follow up on that. It appears that the Government are coming forward with some very strong powers on HMRC and inspection for things such as mansion tax. Yet, on something that is about life and death, we seem to be skirting around the houses a little....

Member
Lord Jamieson (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2026
Reference
860 c99GC
House
House of Lords

It certainly is, which is why we are making sure that we are addressing the issue. I will also write to the noble Lord about exactly where we are on the legal framework and its development.

On hygiene, which was another issue raised, it is about a deficiency in the property...

Member
Lord Wilson of Sedgefield (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2026
Reference
860 cc99-100GC
House
House of Lords

I am sorry to be finicky; I just want to understand this. I read through the impact assessment and the Minister is right: familiarisation, triage, prep and postage are essentially administrative costs of the process. It goes on to talk about non-monetised impacts, which are impossible to assess. I am...

Member
Lord Jamieson (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2026
Reference
860 c100GC
House
House of Lords

I think we have covered the figures. If we come across any other figures, I can surely pass them on to the noble Lord. This is part of a wider regulatory framework that helps keep people in social housing safe. Obviously, if these are complied with, the additional cost will...

Member
Lord Wilson of Sedgefield (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2026
Reference
860 cc100-1GC
House
House of Lords

To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of Anthropic’s decision not to provide its Claude Mythos 5.1 model to the UK AI Security Institute for pre-release testing; whether the Institute has subsequently been provided with access to that model; and what steps they are taking to ensure...

Asked by
Lord Nagaraju (Labour)
Answering body
Cabinet Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
12 October 2026
Reference
HL3641
House
House of Lords

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, whether her Department plans to bring forward legislation to amend section 7A of the Road Traffic Act 1988 so that a specimen of blood taken from a driver incapable of giving consent may be tested without that driver's subsequent consent.

Asked by
David Williams (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
12 October 2026
Reference
30325
House
House of Commons

To ask His Majesty's Government what steps they are taking to ensure that the AI Security Institute has access to frontier artificial intelligence models for pre-release safety testing.

Asked by
Lord Taylor of Warwick (Non-affiliated)
Answering body
Cabinet Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
9 October 2026
Reference
HL3654
House
House of Lords

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what progress has been made on improving access to T&E resources.

Asked by
Stuart Anderson (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
6 October 2026
Reference
21702
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what progress has been made on Test and Evaluation (T&E) Transformation.

Asked by
Stuart Anderson (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
6 October 2026
Reference
21701
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, with reference to paragraph 3.2.31 of the Defence Investment Plan, published on 30 June 2026, in which month in 2026 does he plan to launch an online Test and Evaluation marketplace.

Asked by
Ben Obese-Jecty (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
6 October 2026
Reference
23052
House
House of Commons

To ask His Majesty's Government what personnel are eligible to be awarded the Nuclear Test Medal.

Asked by
Lord Bourne of Aberystwyth (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
25 September 2026
Reference
HL3465
House
House of Lords

To ask His Majesty's Government what is the official definition of the term British nuclear test veteran; whether that definition includes British service personnel who were officially deployed to monitor foreign atmospheric nuclear tests after 1966; and, if they are not included in the definition, whether they will establish and...

Asked by
Lord Bourne of Aberystwyth (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
23 September 2026
Reference
HL3299
House
House of Lords

To ask His Majesty's Government whether they have an official definition of the term "British nuclear test veteran"; if so, whether that definition includes British service personnel who were officially deployed to monitor foreign atmospheric nuclear tests after 1966, including personnel of RAF 543 Squadron and RAF 27 Squadron; and if...

Asked by
Lord Bourne of Aberystwyth (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
23 September 2026
Reference
HL3464
House
House of Lords

To ask His Majesty's Government what criteria they used to award the Nuclear Test Medal; and what nuclear tests are eligible for an award.

Asked by
Lord Bourne of Aberystwyth (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
22 September 2026
Reference
HL3602
House
House of Lords

To ask His Majesty's Government how many British military personnel who took part in nuclear weapons testing are currently alive; and what plans they have, if any, to compensate them.

Asked by
Lord Bourne of Aberystwyth (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
17 September 2026
Reference
HL3056
House
House of Lords

To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the treatment of nuclear test veterans in the United States and France; and what lessons they have learned from comparisons with those countries’ approaches to the provision of compensation for veterans affected by nuclear testing and their descendants.

Asked by
Lord Bourne of Aberystwyth (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
17 September 2026
Reference
HL3055
House
House of Lords

To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the assertion made by the then Mayor of Greater Manchester, Andy Burnham, in a June 2025 interview on Newsnight that there had been a cover-up concerning British veterans involved in nuclear weapons testing.

Asked by
Lord Bourne of Aberystwyth (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
17 September 2026
Reference
HL3053
House
House of Lords

To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the assertion of former Veterans' Minister, Tobias Ellwood, that the Ministry of Defence deliberately withheld medical records of veterans who oversaw nuclear tests.

Asked by
Lord Bourne of Aberystwyth (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
17 September 2026
Reference
HL3054
House
House of Lords

To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, what assessment the Government has made of the adequacy of the AI Security Institute’s access arrangements with frontier AI developers following reports concerning Claude Mythos 5.1; whether the Minister will publish, for each of Anthropic and OpenAI, the number of models for...

Asked by
Wendy Morton (Conservative)
Answering body
Cabinet Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Tabled
Date
15 September 2026
Reference
29989
House
House of Commons

I previously put it to the Prisons Minister in one of these sessions that anyone who fails a drug test on arrival in an open prison like Kirkham does not belong there and should be sent back to a more secure prison. The Minister said they were concerned but could not agree to that. Has the Department had any more thoughts on at least consequences for failing a drug test on arrival at an open prison?

Asked by
Andrew Snowden (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Justice
Topical questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
15 September 2026
Reference
790 c1580
House
House of Commons

I absolutely recognise the hon. Gentleman’s concerns. We have a review ongoing into these issues within prisons, led by Amber Rudd, and we will continue to ensure that we have the deterrence, to stop drugs getting in, and that the right actions are taken when they do.

Answered by
Catherine McKinnell (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Justice
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
15 September 2026
Reference
790 c1580
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, how much will be spent on uncrewed and autonomous testing for the British Army in the (a) current and (b) remaining financial years of this Parliament.

Asked by
James Cartlidge (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
14 September 2026
Reference
27980
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, how much will be spent on uncrewed and autonomous testing for the Royal Air Force in the (a) current and (b) remaining financial years of this Parliament.

Asked by
James Cartlidge (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
14 September 2026
Reference
27979
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what progress his Department has made towards publishing records about Nuclear Test Veterans from The Technical Cooperation Programme.

Asked by
Emma Lewell (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
11 September 2026
Reference
27244
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what the total amount is that will be spent on uncrewed and autonomous testing for the Royal Navy in the (a) current and (b) remaining financial years of this parliament.

Asked by
James Cartlidge (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
10 September 2026
Reference
27496
House
House of Commons
Laid by
Secretary Heidi Alexander
Department
Department for Transport
Type
Statutory instruments
Date
10 September 2026
Reference
SI 2026/992
House
House of Commons; House of Lords

To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the potential role of minimal residual disease testing in supporting more personalised treatment pathways for blood cancer patients.

Asked by
Lord Mendelsohn (Labour)
Answering body
Department of Health and Social Care
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
9 September 2026
Reference
HL2209
House
House of Lords

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, if she will introduce mandatory vehicle registration plate compliance checks as part of the MOT testing regime.

Asked by
Grahame Morris (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
26917
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation, Science and Trade, what assessment his Department has made of the adequacy of specialised rocket propulsion testing facilities, in supporting academic research, student competitions, and start-up enterprise testing.

Asked by
Oliver Dowden (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Business, Innovation, Science and Trade
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
21185
House
House of Commons

Lords committee stage third day. Clauses 37 to 61 agreed to. Bill reported with amendments (HL Bill 49).

Lead member
Baroness Ramsey of Wall Heath; Baroness Lloyd of Effra
Answering member
Viscount Camrose; Lord Markham
Department
Department for Business, Innovation, Science and Trade
Type
Committee proceedings; Debates on bills
Notes
Northern Ireland, Scottish and Welsh legislative consent sought.
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 cc163-200GC
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Clement-Jones

92C: Clause 37, page 62, line 24, leave out subsection (7)

Member’s explanatory statement

This probing amendment would remove the power for the Secretary of State to amend this Act by regulations so as to change the consultation and parliamentary scrutiny requirements applying to a code of practice. It responds...

Member
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 c163GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I think that we are in the final furlong. In moving my Amendment 92C, I will also speak to the closely aligned Amendment 95C under my name. These amendments raise a profound and non-negotiable constitutional principle. They respond directly to the almost always authoritative recommendations of the Delegated...

Member
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 cc163-4GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the noble Lord, Lord Clement-Jones, for opening the final day of Committee. For a Bill of such importance, I am surprised at the speed of our progress. However, if quantity has been low, quality has more than compensated.

I agree with the noble Lord that this Committee...

Member
Viscount Camrose (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 cc164-5GC
House
House of Lords

I thank the noble Lord for his Amendments 92C and 95C, and note that these amendments were recommended by the Delegated Powers and Regulatory Reform Committee in its report of 17 July. Some noble Lords may be aware that, until very recently, I was the chair of that committee. I...

Member
Baroness Ramsey of Wall Heath (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 cc165-6GC
House
House of Lords

I thank the Minister for her response, which was the reverse of the usual ministerial response—the sting was not in the tail but at the beginning. The end was much more conciliatory, given that she said the Government will consider taking on board the DPRRC’s recommendations before Report. I very...

Member
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 c166GC
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Baroness Northover

99: After Clause 42, insert the following new Clause—

“Cyber security competence: functions of the UK Cyber Security Council

(1) The UK Cyber Security Council is to exercise the functions described in subsection (2) and is accountable to the Secretary of State for the exercise of those functions.

(2) The functions...

Member
Baroness Northover (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 c167GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, all the amendments that I have put down to the Bill are derived from evidence we received on the National Resilience Select Committee. I am sorry that I was not here last week to address those that came up then, and I am very grateful to my noble...

Member
Baroness Northover (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 cc167-9GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I was hoping that there would be other contributors—there will be a double-banking on this amendment.

I support Amendment 99, tabled by my noble friend. Throughout our deliberations on this Bill, the Government have placed enormous emphasis on imposing tough, outcomes-based statutory duties on operators and suppliers across our...

Member
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 c169GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I intervene in support of the amendment in the name of the noble Baroness, Lady Northover. I do not want the Liberal

Democrats to be on their own, so I hear the call from the noble Lord, Lord Clement-Jones. It brings me back to the coalition days, when...

Member
Lord Vaizey of Didcot (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 cc169-170GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I very much hope that the Government will accept the amendment in the name of the noble Baroness, Lady Northover. It strikes me as a practical and important contribution to the Bill.

In addition to the points that have already been made by noble colleagues, there is one more...

Member
Baroness Neville-Jones (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 c170GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the noble Baroness, Lady Northover, for bringing forward Amendment 99. Throughout our consideration of the Bill, I have returned several times to the distinction between cyber compliance and cyber capability, and this amendment goes directly to that issue. We can impose ever more duties on businesses,...

Member
Lord Markham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 c171GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the noble Baroness for her amendment, in particular her focus on the importance of the skills and competence of the UK cyber security professionals on whom we all rely and our economy will continue to rely. As the noble Lord, Lord Vaizey, said, an important aspect...

Member
Baroness Lloyd of Effra (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 cc171-3GC
House
House of Lords

I thank the Minister for her thoughtful reply and I thank other noble Lords for their support here. Clearly, we are all seeking to move in the same direction. There is a challenge and risks here that are incredibly important. Whether this is the right way forward, we will have...

Member
Baroness Northover (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 c173GC
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Baroness Northover

100: After Clause 42, insert the following new Clause—

“National cyber security support service for small and medium-sized enterprises

(1) The Secretary of State must, by regulations, make provision for the establishment and operation of a national cyber security support and incident response service for relevant small and medium-sized enterprises...

Member
Baroness Northover (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 cc173-4GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this amendment again comes out of the evidence submitted to our National Resilience Select Committee.

It has been reported that many SMEs think that they are too small to be a target. However, as was reported at Second Reading, government research shows that 50% of UK SMEs faced some...

Member
Baroness Northover (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 cc174-5GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I rise early to support the amendment from the noble Baroness, Lady Northover, partly to spare the stress of the noble Lord, Lord Clement-Jones, and also because there is a Liberal Democrat amendment imminent in the Chamber, although we of course will be abstaining—our solidarity with the Liberal...

Member
Lord Vaizey of Didcot (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 cc175-6GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I support Amendment 100, in the name of the noble Baroness, Lady Northover. I spoke in support of this type of amendment at Second Reading and I still support its intentions, but I will give it an added twist. The question in my mind is where this resource...

Member
Lord Londesborough (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 cc176-7GC
House
House of Lords

I think we all share the sympathy that the noble Baroness, Lady Northover, has identified SMEs need. There are 5.7 million SMEs in the UK and many of them—indeed, most of them—will purchase what are relatively complex platforms. The noble Lord, Lord Londesborough, is extremely experienced in the SME sector;...

Member
Lord Birt (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 c177GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I too support Amendment 100, in the name of my noble friend Lady Northover, and will add my support to the very

useful speeches from the noble Lords, Lord Vaizey, Lord Birt and Lord Londesborough. I entirely agree with the noble Lord, Lord Vaizey, about the need to...

Member
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 cc177-9GC
House
House of Lords

To continue, if the state is going to impose heavy, legally binding supply chain security duties on small businesses, backed by turnover-based fines, the state has a moral and strategic obligation to provide the operational tools needed to meet those standards. By establishing a free, Australian-style digital safety net under...

Member
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 c179GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the noble Baroness, Lady Northover, for her amendment and, needless to say, I support the intention behind it. It is clearly right that, having placed several new duties on businesses and their vendors, the Government consider how to ensure that they are able to carry them...

Member
Viscount Camrose (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 cc179-180GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the noble Baroness for her amendment and for linking the issue of cyber security with wider questions on national resilience; she is absolutely right to situate it in that space. I also thank her for introducing the topic of the right amount of cyber security support...

Member
Baroness Lloyd of Effra (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 cc180-1GC
House
House of Lords

I thank the Minister, and I thank noble Lords for their support. This is clearly an area where we agree that there is a problem; we are very vulnerable in the United Kingdom. What we have in place is clearly not working sufficiently well if 60% of SMEs that are...

Member
Baroness Northover (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 cc181-2GC
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Clement-Jones

148A: After Clause 52, insert the following new Clause—

“Appeals against decisions under section 50

(1) A person may appeal to the Upper Tribunal against—

(a) a confirmation decision given to the person under section 50;

(b) a decision under section 50 to require the person to pay a penalty;

(c) the amount...

Member
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 c183GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, Amendment 148A stands in my name on the Marshalled List. This amendment would address a profound, structural and deeply disturbing gap in the judicial oversight and democratic accountability of the Bill. It represents a direct implementation of the authoritative recommendation of the Select Committee on the Constitution, in...

Member
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 cc183-5GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, in addressing the amendment in the name of the noble Lord, Lord Clement-Jones, I may increase his stress levels, unfortunately, as I oppose it. This means, I guess, that I am supporting the Government—that is, unless the Government are going to perform a volte-face in the face of...

Member
Lord Vaizey of Didcot (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 cc184-6GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the noble Lord, Lord Clement-Jones, for introducing this important group and all noble Lords for their contributions. Beginning with Amendment 148A, it is reasonable to suggest that there should be a further right to appeal, given that we are talking about potentially large penalties of £17...

Member
Lord Markham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 cc186-7GC
House
House of Lords

I thank noble Lords for their amendments, starting with Amendment 148A, from the noble Lord, Lord Clement-Jones, which indeed

is in line with the recommendation from the Constitution Committee, which I thank for its report and its detailed scrutiny of this legislation.

As the noble Lord points out, Part 4 enables...

Member
Baroness Lloyd of Effra (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 cc187-8GC
House
House of Lords

I resume with Amendments 174A and 174B, which were introduced by the noble Lord, Lord Markham. They would require the Secretary of State to create a register of “foreign powers” that pose a threat to UK cyber security, to review this register and to lay the report in Parliament. This...

Member
Baroness Lloyd of Effra (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 cc188-9GC
House
House of Lords

I thank the Minister for her response and the noble Lords, Lord Vaizey and Lord Markham, for their contributions. I cannot help feeling that the approach to this by the noble Lord, Lord Vaizey, is coloured by his history as a Minister. I can understand that because I saw the...

Member
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 c189GC
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Clement-Jones

164: After Clause 58, insert the following new Clause—

“Computer Misuse Act 1990: statutory defence for cyber security activities

(1) The Secretary of State must, within 12 months of the day on which this Act is passed, carry out and publish a review of whether the introduction of a statutory...

Member
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 c190GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, Amendment 164 is in my name and, I am delighted to say, that of the noble Lord, Lord Arbuthnot of Edrom. Sadly, he is tied up next door with matters of national security—I hope that I am not giving away any secrets—and is unable to speak to this...

Member
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 cc190-3GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I strongly support the amendment from the noble Lord, Lord Clement-Jones, whether technically or in spirit. He is right to point out how outdated the Computer Misuse Act is and that its blanket prohibition on undertaking cyber security activities without any public interest defence is ridiculous.

The noble Lord’s...

Member
Lord Vaizey of Didcot (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 c193GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the campaign to reform the Computer Misuse Act is at least 10 years old, not just five. We—including me—have been working to try to get the provision that is contained in the amendment before us from the noble Lord, Lord Clement-Jones. I endorse every single word that he...

Member
Baroness Neville-Jones (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 cc193-4GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will speak briefly in support of the amendment from the noble Lord, Lord Clement-Jones, which he so comprehensively set out. I did not mention this at Second Reading because I thought it was so self-evidently sensible that this needed to be fixed. I should know better, having...

Member
Baroness Harding of Winscombe (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 c194GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, one of the advantages of being in this Committee Room for these debates in Committee is that I can use Claude—I hope that is allowed—to answer the question of what the cyber security community thinks about the Computer Misuse Act. The answer comes back in bold. I will...

Member
Lord Tarassenko (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 c194GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the noble Lord, Lord Clement-Jones, for introducing this amendment and the noble Lord, Lord Arbuthnot of Edrom, whom I see in his place. I am sorry he was unable to attend the beginning of this debate, but we are told it was for very good reasons....

Member
Viscount Camrose (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 cc194-5GC
House
House of Lords

I am grateful to the noble Lord for raising this topic through his amendment, and I recognise the strength of feeling on reforming the Computer Misuse Act. I agree that the UK should have the right legislative framework to allow us to tackle the threats posed by cyber criminals.

The Home...

Member
Baroness Lloyd of Effra (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 cc195-6GC
House
House of Lords

I thank the Minister for that response. The noble Lord, Lord Vaizey, said that we know what the Minister will say: that it will be in a future piece of legislation. To that extent, we are pleased that at least we have a commitment to it, but this has been...

Member
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 c196GC
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Markham

174E: After Clause 58, insert the following new Clause—

“Increasing resilience by reducing data retention

(1) The Secretary of State must, within one month of the day on which this Act is passed, open a consultation on the potential impact of minimising data collection and increasing data anonymisation on the...

Member
Lord Markham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 cc196-7GC
House
House of Lords

Amendment 174E in my name and those of my noble friends Lord Camrose and Lord Holmes builds on the point I made in the debate last Thursday that the best defence in cyber is, of course, not to present an attractive target in the first place.

I go back to my...

Member
Lord Markham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 c197GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, despite the fact that this is the last group, it is a really important area and this amendment rightly reflects that. We strongly support Amendment 174E. It would introduce a fundamentally elegant and highly necessary cyber security principle that the Bill has otherwise completely ignored: that of data...

Member
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 cc197-9GC
House
House of Lords

I thank the noble Lord, Lord Markham, for raising this important issue again. Good data hygiene and security is essential to ensuring that public bodies are resilient to cyber attacks. Through the Bill, we are better protecting data, to make our essential services safer and more secure for all those...

Member
Baroness Lloyd of Effra (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 cc198-200GC
House
House of Lords

In the spirit of her final remarks on the Bill overall, is the Minister able to give any update as to when the national cyber action plan might emerge?

Member
Viscount Camrose (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 c200GC
House
House of Lords