Skip to main content

1-20 of 1,511 results for subject:Tibet

Type

-
Early day motions (64)
+ Legislation (3) + Bills (3) + Public bills (3) + Private members' bills (3)
-
Presentation bills (2)
-
Ten minute rule bills (1)
+ Members' contributions (743)
-
Business questions (12)
-
Oral answers to questions (151)
+ Oral questions (168)
-
Prime Minister's questions (12)
-
Topical questions (14)
-
Proceeding contributions (424)
+ Parliamentary committees (10) + Committee proceedings (4)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (4)
-
Select Committee reports (4)
-
Select Committee reports (Government responses) (2)
+ Parliamentary papers (16)
-
Command papers (3)
-
Deposited papers (5)
-
House of Commons papers (8)
+ Parliamentary proceedings (41) + Debates (28)
-
Adjournment debates (13)
-
Backbench debates (2)
+ Committee proceedings (4)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (4)
-
Opposition days (1)
-
Questions for short debate (5)
+ Petitions and observations (2)
-
Observations on petitions (1)
-
Paper petitions (1)
+ Statements (8) + Oral statements (2)
-
Ministerial statements (1)
-
Speaker's statements (1)
-
Written statements (6)
+ Written corrections (2)
-
Ministerial corrections (2)
+ Parliamentary questions (823)
-
Business questions (12)
+ Oral questions (168)
-
Prime Minister's questions (12)
-
Topical questions (14)
-
Written questions (643)
+ Petitions and observations (2)
-
Observations on petitions (1)
-
Paper petitions (1)
+ Research briefings (5)
-
Commons Briefing papers (2)
-
Commons Debate packs (2)
+ Lords Library Briefings (1)
-
Lords Library Briefings - Debates (1)

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

More

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

That this House expresses deep concern over the intensification of Chinese state repression against Tibetans; recognises that on 2 July 2026, Tibetan activist Lobsang Palden, widely known as Lobga Rangzen, set himself on fire outside of the United Nations Headquarters in New York, a day after China’s new so-called Ethnic...

Primary sponsor
Chris Law (Scottish National Party)
Type
Early day motions
Date
16 July 2026
Reference
652
House
House of Commons

To ask His Majesty's Government what steps they are taking with international partners to secure independent access to Tibet for United Nations’ experts and independent observers, following the entry into force of China’s Law on Promoting Ethnic Unity and Progress on 1 July.

Asked by
Lord Alton of Liverpool (Crossbench)
Answering body
Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
13 July 2026
Reference
HL1651
House
House of Lords

The Tibetan Parliament in exile, which the all-party parliamentary group on Tibet visited a couple of weeks ago—we have engaged extensively with it—is terribly worried that the central Tibet Autonomous Region is completely closed off by the Chinese Communist party to any outside access. Little comes out and almost nothing goes in. Is the Minister not worried about the complete secrecy in which the Chinese authorities can conduct environmental destruction that has a massive global impact?

Asked by
Wera Hobhouse (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
16 June 2026
Reference
787 c690
House
House of Commons

The hon. Lady raises an important concern. We are concerned by reporting from the UN special rapporteurs that large-scale environmental projects in Tibet risk the forced displacement of Tibetans from their ancestral villages. It is important that we keep these issues on our radar.

Answered by
Seema Malhotra (Labour)
Answering body
Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
16 June 2026
Reference
787 c690
House
House of Commons

What assessment she has made of the potential implications for her Department's policies of the level of risk to countries arising from environmental change in the Tibetan plateau.

Asked by
Kerry McCarthy (Labour)
Answering body
Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
16 June 2026
Reference
900431; 787 cc689-690
House
House of Commons

Mr Speaker, I echo your words about Jo Cox, our friend and colleague, who we remember in our hearts. Had she not been so brutally murdered, she would have been in this House and, I am almost certain, would have been present for Foreign Office questions today.

Rivers originating from the Tibetan plateau are thought to sustain 1.8 billion people directly, providing drinking water, irrigation and power generation. Through the Himalayan resilience action programme, the UK has supported research into climate and environment risks around the Tibetan plateau and supported efforts to strengthen climate resilience in the region. The resilience action programme has promoted science-based policy and dialogue across the Hindu Kush Himalaya.

Answered by
Seema Malhotra (Labour)
Answering body
Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
16 June 2026
Reference
787 c689
House
House of Commons

Mr Speaker, I echo what you said about Jo Cox. I think her message is more important today than it ever was.

I thank the Minister for her response. China’s actions, from environmentally destructive mining to building dams to divert water sources, will have consequences far beyond the Tibetan plateau, as she says, as will the failure to address the impact of climate change on the third pole. What steps can the UK take to raise these issues at a global level? Does the Minister agree that the voices of Tibetans should be heard in any such talks?

Asked by
Kerry McCarthy (Labour)
Answering body
Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
16 June 2026
Reference
787 c690
House
House of Commons

The UK continues to engage with China on climate and environmental issues. During the recent UK-China environment dialogue, the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs secured agreement for greater collaboration with China on ecosystem resilience, biodiversity, conservation and multilateral environmental processes. Our Himalayan resilience action plan is building regional resilience through nature-based solutions, tackling water insecurity, air quality management and promoting dialogue through the International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development. As countries come together in pursuit of these solutions, it is important that affected communities are consulted.

Answered by
Seema Malhotra (Labour)
Answering body
Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
16 June 2026
Reference
787 c690
House
House of Commons

To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the Human Rights Watch report, “Start with the Youngest Children” China’s Use of Preschools to “Integrate” Tibetans, published in May, on China’s suppression of the Tibetan Language in preschools and the imposition of Mandarin Chinese as the medium of...

Asked by
Lord Alton of Liverpool (Crossbench)
Answering body
Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
26 May 2026
Reference
HL81
House
House of Lords

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Affairs, whether the Prime Minister raised the issue of the succession of the Dalai Lama with a) President Xi and b) Premier Li during his visit to China in January 2026.

Asked by
Chris Law (Scottish National Party)
Answering body
Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
24 March 2026
Reference
121390
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Affairs, what representations she has made to the Government of China regarding recent legislative and policy developments affecting Tibetans, Uyghurs and other communities with distinct religious identities.

Asked by
Danny Kruger (Reform UK)
Answering body
Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
10 March 2026
Reference
117915
House
House of Commons

Lords statement on the Prime Minister's visit to China and Japan.

Lead member
Baroness Smith of Basildon
Department
Lord Privy Seal
Type
Ministerial statements
Date
4 February 2026
Reference
852 cc1622-1641
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful for the opportunity to ask questions on a Statement by our well-travelled Prime Minister. Actually, we on this side

do not criticise the Prime Minister for travelling abroad: it is part of his job. What we do criticise is the devastating impact his policies are...

Member
Lord True (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 February 2026
Reference
852 cc1635-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, these Benches believe the Government should engage internationally, and the Prime Minister likewise, to operate with allies and competitors alike. But when it comes to competitors who have been proven to also be adversaries and security risks, that engagement, if transactional, must actively de-risk.

On the Chinese risk to...

Member
Lord Purvis of Tweed (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 February 2026
Reference
852 cc1637-9
House
House of Lords

I am grateful to both noble Lords for their comments. Those from the noble Lord, Lord True, clearly underline the fundamental difference between the party opposite and us. Let us just start from where we are. The fundamental difference is that the party opposite went from a golden age of...

Member
Baroness Smith of Basildon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 February 2026
Reference
852 cc1639-1640
House
House of Lords

The noble Lord raises a number of issues, but the bottom line is that he asks whether engagement is better than stepping away and shouting. That is the fundamental difference between us and the party opposite. The kinds of issues he raises about investment, business and trade are important, but...

Member
Baroness Smith of Basildon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 February 2026
Reference
852 c1641
House
House of Lords

My Lords, given the profound uncertainty surrounding the UK’s treaty with Mauritius in respect of the Chagos Islands, can the noble Baroness the Lord Privy Seal confirm that further consideration of this Bill will not resume until the necessary amendments to the 1966 treaty—UN treaty 8737—between the UK and the...

Member
Earl of Minto (Conservative; Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 February 2026
Reference
852 c1641
House
House of Lords

I must say to the noble Lord that I am responsible for many things, but the timing of our debates is a matter not for me but for the Chief Whip, who might not appreciate me saying what the timing could be. I will say to the noble Earl that...

Member
Baroness Smith of Basildon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 February 2026
Reference
852 c1624
House
House of Lords

My Lords, as chair of the UK-Japan 21st Century Group, I warmly welcome the Prime Minister’s visit to Japan, following his visit to China and emphasise how important it is that we visit, link up with, negotiate with and do deals with our best friends, as well as those who...

Member
Lord McConnell of Glenscorrodale (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 February 2026
Reference
852 c1624
House
House of Lords

I thank the noble Lord for his interest and his role in this. Japan has been a valued partner and it has been a very deep relationship, for instance with £33 billion in annual trade and 150,000 jobs created. Japan is our closest security partner in Asia. On the noble...

Member
Baroness Smith of Basildon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 February 2026
Reference
852 c1625
House
House of Lords