Skip to main content

1-12 of 12 results for subject:Unichem

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My right hon. Friend will no doubt be aware of early-day motion 2786, which refers to the recent deal between Pfizer and Unichem. [That this House expresses deep concern over the decision by Pfizer to award the contract for sole supplying of its pharmaceutical products to one wholesaler Unichem; is...

Member
Jim McGovern (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 October 2006
Reference
450 c1692
House
House of Commons

That this House expresses deep concern over the decision by Pfizer to award the contract for sole supplying of its pharmaceutical products to one wholesaler Unichem; is alarmed that this has created a de facto monopoly for Unichem in that pharmacies have no choice about who they deal with if...

Primary sponsor
Jim McGovern (Labour)
Type
Early day motions
Date
17 October 2006
Reference
2786
House
House of Commons

SI 1997/1530 (Negative instrument). Coming into force 17 July 1997.

Department
Department of Trade and Industry
Type
Statutory instruments
Date
19 June 1997
Reference
SI 1997/1530
House
House of Commons; House of Lords

Revocation of the Unichem Limited (Allotment of Shares) order 1989. DTI. 1997.

Deposited by
Department of Trade and Industry
Type
Deposited papers
Date
3 March 1997
Reference
Dep/3 4700
House
House of Commons
Date
19 July 1996
Reference
Cm 3344
House
House of Commons

To amend Unichem Ltd. (Allotment of Shares) Order 1989 to prevent Unichem from continuing with change of trading terms introduced on 1 July & to ensure that shares issued to new members recruited after date of order do not rank for participation in planned flotation of Unichem; & to prevent...

Asked by
Mike Woodcock (Conservative)
Answering body
Department of Trade and Industry
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
28 July 1989
Reference
157 c1079W
House
House of Commons

What action will be taken following publication last month of a proposed order to prohibit UniChem Ltd from continuing to operate its share scheme as recommended by Monopolies & Mergers Commission in their report published on 17 May - Incl ref to UniChem Limited (Allotment of Shares) Order 1989 which...

Asked by
Phillip Oppenheim (Conservative)
Answering body
Department of Trade and Industry
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
28 June 1989
Reference
155 c457W;155 c459W
House
House of Commons

Statement on publication of Monopolies & Mergers Commission's report on Unichem.

Asked by
Nicholas Bennett (Conservative)
Answering body
Department of Trade and Industry
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
17 May 1989
Reference
153 c240-1W;153 c239-40W
House
House of Commons

To place a copy of the Monopolies & Mergers Commission report into Unichem in the Library.

Asked by
Lord Corbett of Castle Vale (Labour)
Answering body
Department of Trade and Industry
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
2 May 1989
Reference
152 c44W;152 c43W
House
House of Commons

In view of financial losses that are being sustained by other companies as result of scheme in question to instruct Director General of Fair Trading to expedite his consideration of alleged breaches by Unichem Ltd of Competition Act

Asked by
John Townend (Conservative)
Answering body
Department of Trade and Industry
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
4 July 1988
Reference
136 c424W;136 c416W
House
House of Commons

When a decision is expected as to whether to institute proceedings against Unichem plc for alleged breach of the Prevention of Fraud (Investment) Act 1958 - (Holding answer 26 April 1988)

Asked by
John Townend (Conservative)
Answering body
Department of Trade and Industry
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
28 April 1988
Reference
132 c225-6W
House
House of Commons

Various questions on industrial & provident societies - to ensure stock market flotation schemes comply with Companies Financial Services & Prevention of Fraud (Investments) Acts, to prevent misleading advertisements concerning stock market value of shares, to refer to OFT issue of bonus shares linked to tied customer purchases & to...

Asked by
John Townend (Conservative)
Answering body
Department of Trade and Industry
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
8 March 1988
Reference
129 c113-4W
House
House of Commons