1-5 of 5 results for subject:Valpak
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.228 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.001 seconds
- Search query
- subject:Valpak
- We searched for
- subject_t:Valpak OR subject_ses:85512
Type
+
Parliamentary committees (2)
+
Committee proceedings (1)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (1)
-
Select Committee reports (1)
+
Parliamentary papers (2)
-
House of Commons papers (1)
-
House of Lords papers (1)
+
Parliamentary proceedings (1)
+
Debates (1)
+
Committee proceedings (1)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (1)
+
Parliamentary questions (3)
-
Written questions (3)
House
Session
Year
Department
Member
Primary member
Answering member
Legislative stage
Legislation
Subject
More
Publisher
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (1) whether his Department monitors how VALPAK uses its licence fee income from the use of the Green Dot trademark;
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (1) whether his Department monitors how VALPAK uses its licence fee income from the use of the Green Dot trademark;
Asked by
Andrew George
(Liberal Democrat)
Answered by
Ben Bradshaw
(Labour)
Answering body
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Tabled on
21 June 2007
For answer on
28 June 2007
Answered on
28 June 2007
Currently, the Green Dot Licensing Company (a subsidiary of Valpak) is vested with the task of managing the Green Dot trademark in the UK. The Green Dot Licensing Company administers Green Dot licences in the UK on behalf of the licence-holder, Pro-Europe and this decision was made by Pro-Europe rather than the UK Government.Valpak, as part of the agreement with Pro-Europe, are required to manage the Green Dot registered trademark according to English trademark laws. This includes the policing of its use, granting ““User Agreements””‘, ensuring the integrity of the mark is protected and that it is not used in a misleading fashion or in derogation of its meaning in any way.Valpak operates the Green Dot Licensing Company on a non-profit making basis and charges a flat licence fee. The licence fee reflects Valpak’s operating costs and these will depend on the number of Green Dot users; the more users, the lower the fee. The costs are purely operating costs which will be charged back to those companies using the Green Dot logo.
Subjects
Valpak
Date
28 June 2007
Reference
145805; 462 c843W
House
House of Commons
(2) how his Department monitors the use of the Green Dot trademark to ensure that products bearing the trademark uphold the environmental obligations associated with the logo.
(2) how his Department monitors the use of the Green Dot trademark to ensure that products bearing the trademark uphold the environmental obligations associated with the logo.
Asked by
Andrew George
(Liberal Democrat)
Answered by
Ben Bradshaw
(Labour)
Answering body
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Tabled on
21 June 2007
For answer on
28 June 2007
Answered on
28 June 2007
Currently, the Green Dot Licensing Company (a subsidiary of Valpak) is vested with the task of managing the Green Dot trademark in the UK. The Green Dot Licensing Company administers Green Dot licences in the UK on behalf of the licence-holder, Pro-Europe and this decision was made by Pro-Europe rather than the UK Government.Valpak, as part of the agreement with Pro-Europe, are required to manage the Green Dot registered trademark according to English trademark laws. This includes the policing of its use, granting ““User Agreements””‘, ensuring the integrity of the mark is protected and that it is not used in a misleading fashion or in derogation of its meaning in any way.Valpak operates the Green Dot Licensing Company on a non-profit making basis and charges a flat licence fee. The licence fee reflects Valpak’s operating costs and these will depend on the number of Green Dot users; the more users, the lower the fee. The costs are purely operating costs which will be charged back to those companies using the Green Dot logo.
Subjects
Valpak
Date
28 June 2007
Reference
145807; 462 c843W
House
House of Commons
(2) for what reasons the decision was taken to authorise VALPAK to charge a licence fee for the use of the Green Dot trademark;
(2) for what reasons the decision was taken to authorise VALPAK to charge a licence fee for the use of the Green Dot trademark;
Asked by
Andrew George
(Liberal Democrat)
Answered by
Ben Bradshaw
(Labour)
Answering body
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Tabled on
21 June 2007
For answer on
28 June 2007
Answered on
28 June 2007
Currently, the Green Dot Licensing Company (a subsidiary of Valpak) is vested with the task of managing the Green Dot trademark in the UK. The Green Dot Licensing Company administers Green Dot licences in the UK on behalf of the licence-holder, Pro-Europe and this decision was made by Pro-Europe rather than the UK Government.Valpak, as part of the agreement with Pro-Europe, are required to manage the Green Dot registered trademark according to English trademark laws. This includes the policing of its use, granting ““User Agreements””‘, ensuring the integrity of the mark is protected and that it is not used in a misleading fashion or in derogation of its meaning in any way.Valpak operates the Green Dot Licensing Company on a non-profit making basis and charges a flat licence fee. The licence fee reflects Valpak’s operating costs and these will depend on the number of Green Dot users; the more users, the lower the fee. The costs are purely operating costs which will be charged back to those companies using the Green Dot logo.
Subjects
Valpak
Date
28 June 2007
Reference
145806; 462 c843W
House
House of Commons
Type
Select Committee reports; House of Lords papers;
Parliamentary committees
Committee
European Union Committee
Notes
Received 02.08.02
Subjects
Costs; Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs; Department of Trade and Industry; Industry; EU action; Environment Agency; Local government; Recycling; Packaging; Paper; Local Government Association; Standards; Small businesses; Waste management; Waste disposal; Tesco; European Commission; Scottish Environment Protection Agency; Unilever; Association of British Healthcare Industries; British Plastics Federation; Food and Drink Federation; Institute of Wastes Management; Local Authority Recycling Advisory Committee; Wastepack UK; Valpak; Corbey, Dorette; Linpac Group; Biffpack; INCPEN; Packaging Federation; Pro Carton; Alupro; Pearce, David; Linher, Otto; Coggins, Chris
Date
23 July 2002
Reference
HL 166 2001/02
House
House of Lords
Type
House of Commons papers; Select Committee oral evidence;
Parliamentary committees
Committee
Environment, Transport and Regional Affairs Committee
Subjects
Environment protection; Sustainable development; Waste management; Waste disposal; Confederation of British Industry; Friends of the Earth; Community Recycling Network; The Recycling Consortium; Valpak; INCPEN
Date
21 November 2000
Reference
HC 903-v 1999/2000
House
House of Commons