Skip to main content

1-20 of 140 results for subject:Visteon

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

I am grateful to my hon. Friend for that question, and it allows us further to reinforce the point my right hon. Friend the Prime Minister made about paying tribute to those who have campaigned and welcoming what has been offered now by Ford. I particularly pay tribute to my...

Member
Lord Lansley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 April 2014
Reference
578 c1010
House
House of Commons

As we heard yesterday, Visteon pensioners have announced that they and Ford have agreed in principle a multi-million pound deal to settle claims for pension losses suffered by former employees. Since my election, I, the Visteon pensioners and the all-party group on Visteon pensioners in their support—and with your co-operation,...

Member
Stephen Metcalfe (Conservative)
Type
Business questions
Date
3 April 2014
Reference
578 c1010
House
House of Commons

Today the Ford Motor Company agreed a multi-million pound contribution towards the Visteon pension fund for former Ford employees. Will the Prime Minister congratulate

Unite the union which, alongside a cross-party group of MPs, has struggled to get a fair deal for former Ford workers? Will he commit to supporting pensioners facing the same plight at the hands of other multinational companies? [Interruption.]

Asked by
Geraint Davies (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Answering body
Prime Minister
Prime Minister's questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
2 April 2014
Reference
578 c880
House
House of Commons

I did not catch the end of the hon. Gentleman’s question, but I wholeheartedly agree that this is a good development for pensioners. All those who played a role—I think that colleagues on both sides of the House have been involved—are to be credited for the work they have done with Ford to make sure we get that justice.

Answered by
Lord Cameron of Chipping Norton (Conservative)
Answering body
Prime Minister
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
2 April 2014
Reference
578 c881
House
House of Commons

Before I call the mover of the motion, I should inform the House that there is a case awaiting adjudication in the courts on this matter. In view of the length of time for which the case has continued and the distance of the date on which it is next...

Member
Baroness Primarolo (Labour)
Type
Speaker's rulings
Date
12 December 2013
Reference
572 c419
House
House of Commons

I beg to move,

That this House notes that, when Visteon UK Ltd was spun off from the Ford Motor Company, employees transferred from Ford’s pension scheme into the Visteon UK pension fund on the clear understanding that their pension rights would be unaffected; further notes that, when Visteon UK subsequently...

Member
Stephen Metcalfe (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 December 2013
Reference
572 c419
House
House of Commons

I commend the hon. Gentleman and other hon. Members for securing the debate. There are other Members, like me, who were unable to put their names to that request, but who are here and who support the motion. He is right to say that Ford is a good company. It...

Member
Huw Irranca-Davies (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 December 2013
Reference
572 c419
House
House of Commons

I could not agree more, and the issue transcends any legal debates that might be in a court of law. This is about trust and moral responsibility, and a fine company such as Ford has unfortunately blemished its character by not living up to the expectations of its former employees....

Member
Stephen Metcalfe (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 December 2013
Reference
572 c420
House
House of Commons

I apologise for being unable to stay for the whole debate. Does my hon. Friend agree that restitution to the Visteon pensioners would be good not only for them but for the reputation of Ford?

Member
Angela Watkinson (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 December 2013
Reference
572 c420
House
House of Commons

Absolutely. As I have said, this is a stain on Ford’s character and it does not live up to people’s expectations of a blue-chip brand that has been in this country for more than 100 years. That is why I have taken up the issue with such passion over the...

Member
Stephen Metcalfe (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 December 2013
Reference
572 cc420-1
House
House of Commons

I congratulate colleagues on securing this debate, and it is sad that we have to repeat the same arguments from last year. Does my hon. Friend remember reading the Detroit Free Press in November 2012, which I am sure it is a common read in his office? Tim Leuliette was...

Member
Mike Freer (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 December 2013
Reference
572 c421
House
House of Commons

With great sadness I must agree with my hon. Friend. When the chief executive of an entity the size of Visteon says that he could never work out how it was going to succeed, we can draw the conclusion that it was set up to fail. Someone somewhere must have...

Member
Stephen Metcalfe (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 December 2013
Reference
572 c421
House
House of Commons

On that point, in his research, has the hon. Gentleman come across any other company of Ford’s standing, large or small, that has done what Ford did and set up a company almost to ensure that it fails?

Member
Hywel Francis (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 December 2013
Reference
572 c421
House
House of Commons

I have not, but I have confined my research to this issue. There was a trend back in the late 1990s and early 2000s for large motor companies to spin off their parts manufacturer and create separate entities, but Visteon never had a chance, certainly in the UK, as demonstrated...

Member
Stephen Metcalfe (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 December 2013
Reference
572 cc421-2
House
House of Commons

I congratulate my hon. Friend on all the work he has done to try to secure justice for the Visteon pensioners. On that specific point and to avoid this situation in future, would he welcome the Government reflecting on the legal obligations of employers to employees who have their rights...

Member
Jackie Doyle-Price (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 December 2013
Reference
572 c422
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend makes an excellent point. The root of the issue does not lie at the door of the Government, but the Government can do more to protect workers, particularly on how the Pension Protection Fund cap operates when long service is involved. The Government need to ensure that...

Member
Stephen Metcalfe (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 December 2013
Reference
572 cc422-4
House
House of Commons

I am pleased to take part in this critical debate, because the Visteon plant in south Wales is located in my constituency, and I do so on behalf of many of my constituents, many of whom have travelled to London today from Wales. I begin by paying tribute to the...

Member
Hywel Francis (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 December 2013
Reference
572 cc424-5
House
House of Commons

In the light of what my hon. Friend has said about the contrast between Ford and BP, does he think that viewers of this debate and those who read about it in the United States will be surprised, given what they are likely to think about BP after the oil...

Member
Geraint Davies (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 December 2013
Reference
572 c425
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend has made a powerful point, and I agree with him.

On behalf of all my constituents—those who are directly affected and those who are not—I urge Ford, at this late hour, to discharge its duty of care to all Ford and Visteon pensioners throughout the United Kingdom by...

Member
Hywel Francis (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 December 2013
Reference
572 c425
House
House of Commons

I thank the Backbench Business Committee for granting this important debate. I also pay tribute to my hon. Friend the Member for South Basildon and East Thurrock (Stephen Metcalfe) for the tremendous work that he has done as chair of the all-party parliamentary group in support of Visteon pensioners since...

Member
Simon Burns (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 December 2013
Reference
572 cc425-7
House
House of Commons