Skip to main content

1-20 of 837 results for subject:Voyeurism

Type

+ Legislation (4) + Acts (2)
-
Public acts (2)
+ Bills (2) + Public bills (2)
-
Government bills (1)
+ Private members' bills (1)
-
Presentation bills (1)
+ Members' contributions (778)
-
Business questions (3)
-
Oral answers to questions (16)
+ Oral questions (17)
-
Prime Minister's questions (2)
-
Topical questions (6)
-
Proceeding contributions (745)
+ Parliamentary committees (13) + Committee proceedings (13)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (3)
-
Legislative Grand Committee proceedings (HC) (1)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (7)
-
Second Reading Committee proceedings (1)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (1)
-
Select Committee written evidence (1)
+ Parliamentary papers (7)
-
Deposited papers (4)
-
House of Commons papers (1)
-
Impact assessments (3)
+ Parliamentary proceedings (23) + Debates (19)
-
Adjournment debates (1)
+ Committee proceedings (13)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (3)
-
Legislative Grand Committee proceedings (HC) (1)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (7)
-
Second Reading Committee proceedings (1)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (1)
+ Legislative debates (17)
-
Debates on bills (17)
+ Formal proceedings (1)
-
Legislative formal proceedings (1)
+ Statements (1) + Oral statements (1)
-
Ministerial statements (1)
-
Urgent questions (1)
+ Written corrections (1)
-
Ministerial corrections (1)
+ Parliamentary questions (44)
-
Business questions (3)
+ Oral questions (17)
-
Prime Minister's questions (2)
-
Topical questions (6)
-
Urgent questions (1)
-
Written questions (23)
+ Research briefings (3) + Commons Briefing papers (2)
-
Briefing papers on bills (1)
+ Lords Library Briefings (1)
-
Lords Library Briefings - Bills (1)

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask His Majesty's Government when section 98 of the Crime and Policing Act 2026 pertaining to offences relating to semen-defaced images, intimate photographs or films and voyeurism will commence.

Asked by
Baroness Owen of Alderley Edge (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Justice
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
20 July 2026
Reference
HL1834
House
House of Lords

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what steps he is taking with the Secretary of State for the Home Department to help tackle the non-consensual filming of women.

Asked by
Brian Mathew (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Ministry of Justice
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
29 April 2026
Reference
908923
House
House of Commons

What assessment she has made of the adequacy of existing legal frameworks in relation to the non-consensual filming of women in public.

Asked by
Wera Hobhouse (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Home Office
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
23 March 2026
Reference
908441; 783 c10
House
House of Commons

Sadly, as technology becomes entwined in our day-to-day lives, we recognise the threat that tech-enabled harm poses, which is why the violence against women and girls strategy sets out how we are seeking to tackle it. I am pleased to say that, from 1 April, measures under the Protection from Sex-based Harassment in Public Act 2023 will come into force, making it an offence to film where the intent is to cause harassment, alarm or distress because of the victim’s sex.

Answered by
Jess Phillips (Labour)
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
23 March 2026
Reference
783 c10
House
House of Commons

Secretly filmed videos of women on nights out have been viewed more than 3 billion times over the last three years, and the videos are often accompanied by vile, degrading comments. These videos have real victims, but they sit in a legal grey area between voyeurism and harassment, so there is very little that the police can currently do. Will the Minister discuss this legal grey area with me, and possibly look at strengthening the law?

Asked by
Wera Hobhouse (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Home Office
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
23 March 2026
Reference
783 c10
House
House of Commons

I am more than happy to discuss the issue with the hon. Lady. I spent this morning in the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology with the violence against women and girls sector and Ofcom to look at some of those gaps that she has identified. We will do whatever we can, but absolutely, where it is harassment and is in the public realm, it should be covered by the public sex-based harassment law, but I am more than happy to meet her.

Answered by
Jess Phillips (Labour)
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
23 March 2026
Reference
783 c10
House
House of Commons

Lords committee stage fifth day. Clauses 82 to 84 agreed to. New clauses agreed to. Schedule 9, as amended, agreed to. Clauses 85 and 86 agreed to. (Part 1 of 2).

Lead member
Lord Hanson of Flint; Baroness Levitt
Answering member
Lord Davies of Gower; Lord Cameron of Lochiel
Department
Home Office; Ministry of Justice
Type
Debates on bills; Committee of the Whole House (HL)
Notes
Northern Ireland legislative consent granted, Scottish and Welsh legislative consent sought.
Date
9 December 2025
Reference
851 cc106-190
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Davies of Gower

289: Clause 82, page 98, leave out lines 3 to 11

Member’s explanatory statement

This amendment removes the ability of the court to dismiss an action in respect of personal injuries attributable to child sexual abuse on the grounds that the defendant would suffer substantial prejudice.

Member
Lord Davies of Gower (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 December 2025
Reference
851 c117
House
House of Lords

My Lords, Amendment 289 is a probing amendment through which I am seeking the Government’s justification for the substantial prejudice provision in Clause 82. By way of background, Clause 82 removes the three-year limitation period for personal injury claims in cases relating to child sexual abuse. As such, it implements...

Member
Lord Davies of Gower (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 December 2025
Reference
851 cc117-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I have an amendment in this group. I repeat a declaration of interest I made at Second Reading: that I have appeared as a barrister in a number of the leading cases about limitation of the law of tort. The purpose of limitation periods is to give a...

Member
Lord Faulks (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 December 2025
Reference
851 cc118-108
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I have signed Amendment 289. This is the first opportunity I have had to speak in Committee because of family illness, and it is good to be back.

In a previous group of amendments last week, the Committee heard the concerns of a number of Peers worried that the...

Member
Baroness Brinton (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 December 2025
Reference
851 cc120-1
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I think we all welcome the concept of Clause 82, because it provides a significant step forward towards justice for survivors of child sexual abuse. By removing the limitation period, the provision acknowledges the unique barriers facing victims in coming forward after many years of abuse.

Let us be...

Member
Lord Blencathra (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 December 2025
Reference
851 cc110-122
House
House of Lords

My Lords, on these Benches we recognise the purpose of time limits and we recognise the right to fair trial, but survivors of child sexual abuse should not be barred from justice simply by the passage of time. The difficulty lies, of course, in striking that balance. At the moment,...

Member
Baroness Doocey (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 December 2025
Reference
851 c122
House
House of Lords

I add my voice to what has been said by the noble Baroness, Lady Doocey, and the noble Lord, Lord Faulks. The fundamental principle is set out in new Section 11ZB(2): if the defendant cannot have a fair trial, the hearing cannot proceed. The gravity of the allegations and the...

Member
Lord Pannick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 December 2025
Reference
851 c122
House
House of Lords

My Lords, before I speak to Amendment 289, I thank my noble friend Lady Royall, who is not in her place today because she is ill, and Mr Stephen Bernard, both of whom met me recently. We discussed both the impact of the limitation period on victims and survivors of...

Member
Baroness Levitt (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 December 2025
Reference
851 cc122-3
House
House of Lords

The noble Baroness is quite right that the response to IICSA came from the previous Government. It was written by the Ministry of Justice and signed by the noble and learned Lord, Lord Bellamy. While not in any way undermining his contribution to whatever was produced, I suspect that it...

Member
Lord Faulks (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 December 2025
Reference
851 c123
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it is no answer to say that another Government considered it carefully: different Governments have different priorities. I am not sure that that is going to come as a great surprise to the noble Lord. As for Section 33, this Government are satisfied that it does not provide...

Member
Baroness Levitt (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 December 2025
Reference
851 c124
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I shall be very brief in my response. As I say, this was a probing amendment, and I am grateful to those noble Lords who have contributed to this short debate. I thank the Minister for her clarification. I am content with the Government’s assurances, and I therefore...

Member
Lord Davies of Gower (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 December 2025
Reference
851 c114
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Baroness Bertin

290: After Clause 82, insert the following new Clause—

“Amendment of Protection of Children Act 1978

(1) The Protection of Children Act 1978 is amended as follows.

(2) In section 1(1)(a) (indecent photographs of children) after “child” insert “or a person who appears to be or is implied to be a...

Member
Baroness Bertin (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 December 2025
Reference
851 cc115-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I shall speak also to Amendments 291, 292, 298 and 314 in my name and supported by my friends the noble Baronesses, Lady Kennedy, Lady Kidron and Lady Benjamin, and the noble Lord, Lord Clement-Jones. These amendments have the support of many charities, including Barnardo’s, the Internet Watch...

Member
Baroness Bertin (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 December 2025
Reference
851 cc116-8
House
House of Lords