Skip to main content

1-20 of 1,467 results for subject:Wrecks

Type

-
Early day motions (16)
+ Legislation (66) + Acts (5)
-
Public acts (5)
+ Bills (3) + Public bills (3)
-
Government bills (1)
+ Private members' bills (2)
-
Ballot bills (1)
-
Private members' bills (HL) (1)
+ Delegated legislation (58)
-
Statutory instruments (58)
+ Members' contributions (822)
-
Business questions (4)
-
Oral answers to questions (19)
-
Oral question time interventions (1)
+ Oral questions (20)
-
Prime Minister's questions (1)
-
Topical questions (2)
-
Proceeding contributions (781)
+ Parliamentary committees (23) + Committee proceedings (16)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (5)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (7)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (3)
-
Select Committee reports (3)
-
Select Committee reports (Government responses) (1)
-
Select Committee written evidence (3)
+ Parliamentary papers (69)
-
Command papers (16)
-
Consultation papers (4)
-
Deposited papers (40)
-
House of Commons papers (8)
-
Impact assessments (3)
-
Treaties (8)
-
Unprinted command papers (2)
-
White papers (1)
+ Parliamentary proceedings (68) + Debates (44)
-
Adjournment debates (8)
+ Committee proceedings (16)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (5)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (7)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (3)
-
Emergency debate applications (1)
+ Legislative debates (28)
-
Debates on bills (28)
-
Questions for short debate (3)
+ Formal proceedings (1)
-
Legislative formal proceedings (1)
+ Petitions and observations (2)
-
Observations on petitions (1)
-
Paper petitions (1)
+ Statements (20) + Oral statements (1)
-
Ministerial statements (1)
-
Written statements (19)
+ Parliamentary questions (451)
-
Business questions (4)
+ Oral questions (20)
-
Prime Minister's questions (1)
-
Topical questions (2)
-
Written questions (427)
+ Petitions and observations (2)
-
Observations on petitions (1)
-
Paper petitions (1)
+ Research briefings (1) + Lords Briefing packs (1)
-
Lords Briefing packs - Debates (1)

House

Session

Year

Department

More

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

More

Legislative stage

Legislation

More

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what steps he is taking to comply with the Protection of Military Remains Act 1986 and the principles established by the Court of Appeal in Fogg and Ledgard v Secretary of State for Defence [2006] EWCA Civ 1270, to ensure that qualifying...

Asked by
Bob Blackman (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
11 September 2026
Reference
19951
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, if she will review the protections afforded to whistleblowers who disclose information in the public interest relating to potential interference with, disturbance of, or artefact recovery from First and Second World War United Kingdom-owned wrecks and maritime grave sites, including merchant vessels...

Asked by
Bob Blackman (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
19949
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, if she will introduce measures to ensure that information relating to artefacts recovered from United Kingdom-owned First and Second World War wrecks and maritime war graves, including the SS Tilawa, is not routinely withheld under exemptions contained within the Freedom of Information...

Asked by
Bob Blackman (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
19948
House
House of Commons

Lords committee stage second day. Schedule 6 agreed to. Clauses 39 to 46 agreed to. Schedule 7 agreed to. Clauses 47 to 56 agreed to. Bill reported with amendments (HL Bill 50). (Part 2 of 2).

Lead member
Lord Coaker
Answering member
Baroness Goldie; Earl of Minto
Department
Ministry of Defence
Type
Debates on bills; Committee of the Whole House (HL)
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 cc645-700
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord De Mauley

48: Schedule 6, page 134, line 22, leave out paragraph 4

Member's explanatory statement

This amendment would ensure non executive board members remain unpaid and therefore genuinely committed to the reserves and cadets.

Member
Lord De Mauley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 c645
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will speak to Amendments 48, 50, 51 and 52 in my name.

Amendment 48 is about payment to the new non-executive board members. The members of the RFCAs and all their forebear organisations, commencing with the county territorial associations in 1908, whether acting locally or nationally, have never...

Member
Lord De Mauley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 cc645-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I added my name to these amendments, and I agree with the points that have been so well made by the noble Lord, Lord De Mauley. I will start my brief remarks by making just a couple of general points. First, while there have been some criticisms of...

Member
Lord Stirrup (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 cc647-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, again, I should like to say a few words in support of my noble friend Lord De Mauley, and in particular to reinforce everything he said about Amendments 50 and 51. On Amendment 51, I will say no more than that it plays into the issues I was...

Member
Earl Howe (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 cc648-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I support Amendment 50 in the name of the noble Lord, Lord De Mauley, and other noble Lords, which seeks to ensure that lords-lieutenants’ involvement as presidents of regional RFCA councils remains enshrined in primary legislation. I support the comments just made by the noble Earl, Lord Howe.

I...

Member
Lord Dannatt (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 cc649-650
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I too support the amendments in the name of my noble friend Lord De Mauley. I say from the outset that I do not oppose reform in principle and I did not put my name to the notices to oppose Clause 38 or Schedule 6 standing part, which...

Member
Lord Harlech (Conservative; Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 cc650-1
House
House of Lords

I am pleased to add my name to this suite of amendments that cover a broad area. On Amendment 48, I am sure that any of us who have served as Ministers or council leaders will have appointed loads of people to different bodies over the years. One thing I...

Member
Lord Empey (Ulster Unionist Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 cc651-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will speak to the amendments to which I have attached my name. As the noble Lord, Lord Empey, pointed out, this is a reasonable set of amendments. Again, they speak to issues around the Reserve Forces’ and Cadets’ Associations; in many ways, they could have been part...

Member
Baroness Smith of Newnham (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 cc652-3
House
House of Lords

My Lords, much has been said by noble Lords, noble and gallant Lords, me and my noble friend Lord De Mauley about the importance of the continuation of the voluntary nature of the RFCAs. This is not because I wish to sound like a stuck record; it is out of...

Member
Earl of Minto (Conservative; Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 cc653-4
House
House of Lords

I thank the noble Lord, Lord De Mauley, for the amendments whose presentation to us he led on.

I say to the noble Lord, Lord Empey, as I have said on a number of occasions both to the noble Lord, Lord De Mauley, and to the Committee as a whole, that...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 c654
House
House of Lords

I suggest, in answer to that point from the Minister, that what it does is call into question their independence from their MoD masters.

Member
Lord De Mauley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 c654
House
House of Lords

That might be a matter for us to consider in the conversation that we have. I do not want to go on for too long, but I understand many of the comments that different people have made this evening; I agree with some of them to a larger or lesser...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 c654
House
House of Lords

The Minister has said that he does not believe that having paid non-executive directors will lessen their commitment. That is not the question, though. Surely the question is: does having unpaid representatives lessen their commitment? It does not. So why do we want to change it?

Member
Lord Stirrup (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 c654
House
House of Lords

That is the difference. I understand the whole point about the voluntary ethos generally across the reserves and cadet associations; I absolutely accept that. I am saying, with respect to the board members, that, where you are creating a national board

that wants to take on certain statutory functions, that...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 cc654-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank those noble Lords who have spoken in support of the amendments. I also thank the Minister. He said that voluntary bodies all over the country have paid people at their heads. Of course they do. I am a trustee or president of, I think, seven charities....

Member
Lord De Mauley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 c656
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Baroness Brinton

53: After Clause 42, insert the following new Clause—

“Visiting forces agreements

(1) The Secretary of State must publish in unredacted form any part of a treaty, memorandum of understanding or agreement between the United Kingdom and any sending country relating to visiting forces containing a decision about a jurisdictional...

Member
Baroness Brinton (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 c656
House
House of Lords