Skip to main content

1-20 of 480 results for subject:X-rays

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

More

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

More

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what assessment he has made of the causes of delays in issuing Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry results within NHS trusts in England.

Asked by
Olivia Blake (Labour)
Answering body
Department of Health and Social Care
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
8 July 2026
Reference
12554
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what assessment he has made of the potential impact of delayed Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry scan results on timely diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis.

Asked by
Olivia Blake (Labour)
Answering body
Department of Health and Social Care
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
1 July 2026
Reference
12556
House
House of Commons

That this House celebrates Adaptix securing CE certification for its Adaptix Ortho350 product; acknowledges the company's commitment to innovation in the medical imaging field; recognises the impact their product could have on increasing efficiency of extremity medical imaging; notes the product's capacity to deliver fast, low-dose, high resolution 3D X-ray...

Primary sponsor
Scott Arthur (Labour)
Type
Early day motions
Date
20 May 2026
Reference
167
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what steps his Department is taking to improve X-ray technology through the use of artificial intelligence within NHS services in Surrey Heath constituency.

Asked by
Al Pinkerton (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department of Health and Social Care
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
17 November 2025
Reference
82578
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what formal arrangements exist between (a) the Home Office, (b) the NHS and (c) Braintree Community Hospital for (i) scanning and (ii) x-rays of asylum seekers at Wethersfield Airbase.

Asked by
James Cleverly (Conservative)
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
30 October 2025
Reference
83808
House
House of Commons

Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Andrew Western
Answering member
Laura Farris
Department
Home Office
Type
Adjournment debates
Date
19 April 2024
Reference
748 cc623-630
House
House of Commons

It is a privilege to have secured this Adjournment debate on age-disputed refugee children. I should declare at the outset that I am an officer of the all-party parliamentary group on refugees.

I know the Minister will agree that there are few issues more important than the safety of children, but...

Member
Andrew Western (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 April 2024
Reference
748 cc624-6
House
House of Commons

I thank the hon. Member for Stretford and Urmston (Andrew Western) for securing this debate and for the sensitive way he presented these issues. Fairness and decency should indeed sit at the heart of our immigration and asylum system, particularly when it involves children. It might be helpful if I...

Member
Laura Farris (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 April 2024
Reference
748 cc626-7
House
House of Commons

Can the Minister explain why the committee has encouraged the Government to abandon scientific methods of age assessment?

Member
Andrew Western (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 April 2024
Reference
748 c627
House
House of Commons

Let me gently repeat that we are not going to do that. We are one of the only European countries that do not employ any scientific methods, and we are working towards the implementation of that. I think I gave a fair caveat by accepting that there is no single...

Member
Laura Farris (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 April 2024
Reference
748 cc627-9
House
House of Commons

The Minister is being incredibly generous in giving way again. To further the attempts at accuracy, may I press her on the point I made about further monitoring of those whose claim of being a child is rejected at the border? At the moment, we have

no data showing how...

Member
Andrew Western (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 April 2024
Reference
748 c629
House
House of Commons

If the hon. Gentleman would be willing to write to the immigration Minister—I have tried to think about which of the two it would apply to, but I will get my office to clarify that—I will, of course, relay what has happened in this debate and ask them to reply...

Member
Laura Farris (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 April 2024
Reference
748 c630
House
House of Commons

To ask His Majesty's Government whether they are considering using the new screening technology, developed by OsteoSight, for estimating bone mineral density from routine X-rays that has been approved by the Food and Drug Administration in the United States to give earlier diagnosis of osteoporosis.

Asked by
Baroness Merron (Labour)
Answering body
Department of Health and Social Care
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
13 February 2024
Reference
HL2250
House
House of Lords

Lords motion to approve. Amendment to regret agreed to on division (165 to 86). Original motion, as amended, agreed to on question.

Lead member
Lord Sharpe of Epsom
Answering member
Lord Ponsonby of Shulbrede
Department
Home Office
Type
Debates on delegated legislation
Notes
Debated with motion to approve the Immigration (Age Assessments) Regulations 2023.
Date
27 November 2023
Reference
834 cc960-983
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank all noble Lords for attending this debate. The first of these instruments, the Justification Decision (Scientific Age Imaging) Regulations 2023, sets out the affirmative decision made by the Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice on the Home Office’s application to use ionising radiation, also...

Member
Lord Sharpe of Epsom (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 November 2023
Reference
834 cc960-3
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Baroness Brinton

Member
Baroness Brinton (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 November 2023
Reference
834 c963
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I have laid a regret amendment to both the Motion on the Justification Decision (Scientific Age Imaging) Regulations and the Motion on the Immigration (Age Assessment) Regulations. I did not do this lightly but believe that the Government are contradicting themselves in moving ahead with legislation that medical...

Member
Baroness Brinton (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 November 2023
Reference
834 cc963-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am most grateful to the noble Baroness, Lady Brinton, for tabling her regret Motion, which sets out so well why these regulations should be withdrawn. Having challenged the proposals to use X-rays in the sensitive matter of

age assessment in both recent immigration Bills in the early...

Member
Baroness Lister of Burtersett (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 November 2023
Reference
834 cc965-8
House
House of Lords

I know the convention of the House is that I should say it is a pleasure to follow two such brilliant speeches from the noble Baronesses, Lady Brinton and Lady Lister, but it is not actually a pleasure—it is intimidating; one fears the contrast. Mine will be an amateur contribution...

Member
Lord Kerr of Kinlochard (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 November 2023
Reference
834 cc967-970
House
House of Lords

My Lords, in strong support of the noble Baroness, Lady Brinton, and the others who have already spoken in this debate, I would argue that this is primarily a matter of science. On the idea that this is a scientific assessment, it is not. We are using instruments developed by...

Member
Lord Winston (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 November 2023
Reference
834 cc969-971
House
House of Lords