1-20 of 228 results for tabledby:"Anna Sabine"
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.299 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.005 seconds
- Search query
- tabledby:"Anna Sabine"
- We searched for
- tablingMember_ses:547108
Type
House
Session
Year
Department
More
Member
More
Primary member
Answering member
More
Legislative stage
Legislation
Subject
More
Publisher
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, how many women's health hubs have been established in NHS Somerset ICB; and what services they provide.
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, how many women's health hubs have been established in NHS Somerset ICB; and what services they provide.
NHS Somerset Integrated Care Board (ICB) currently has one women’s health hub operating, at Frome Medical Practice, in Frome. It offers long-acting reversible contraception (LARC), ring pessaries and menopause support.
In addition, there is a specialist menopause service for women in Somerset, which takes place in Glastonbury. The service is available via a general practice referral.
The primary care networks of Castle Cary and North Sedgemoor have LARC and ring pessary clinics for all practices. NHS Somerset ICB is working with primary care networks to develop a neighbourhood model to enhance the way women access a range of health services.
To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, whether the Government has assessed the compliance of its contracts with Oracle Corporation with UK GDPR in light of the US CLOUD Act; and whether the Information Commissioner’s Office has been consulted on this matter.
To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, whether the Government has assessed the compliance of its contracts with Oracle Corporation with UK GDPR in light of the US CLOUD Act; and whether the Information Commissioner’s Office has been consulted on this matter.
Public sector digital services are expected to be secure, resilient and effective. This is supported by a framework of safeguards, including data protection legislation, UK security standards, the Cloud First policy, commercial rules and the Data and AI Ethics Framework.
Under UK data protection law, data controllers (including Government Departments) must ensure personal data is protected, including internationally. Where cloud providers may be subject to overseas obligations, such as the US CLOUD Act, Departments as controllers are responsible for assessing and, if necessary, mitigating the risks.
The UK has an adequacy decision for certain US transfers under the UK Extension to the EU-US Data Privacy Framework, which assessed US access laws, including the CLOUD Act. Where adequacy is not relied upon, organisations must use Article 46 safeguards, such as standard contractual clauses.
Given the ICO's role as the UK’s independent regulator, the Government has not had individual engagement on this matter specifically but note that Departments (as data controllers) ensure compliance and engage with it as appropriate.
To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, what safeguards are in place to protect UK data held by US cloud providers from access requests made on US national security grounds outside the scope of the UK–US Data Access Agreement.
To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, what safeguards are in place to protect UK data held by US cloud providers from access requests made on US national security grounds outside the scope of the UK–US Data Access Agreement.
Under UK data protection laws, organisations must ensure personal data is appropriately protected when transferred internationally.
The UK has an adequacy decision for the US, which included an assessment of US national security safeguards. Where adequacy is not relied upon, organisations must rely on alternative safeguards, such as standard contractual clauses.
The UK has been designated a ‘qualifying state’ by the US under Executive Order 14086 allowing individuals whose personal data has been transferred to the US access to redress mechanisms if they believe their personal data has been accessed or handled unlawfully by US authorities for national security purposes.
To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, whether the Government has conducted a legal assessment of the interaction between the US CLOUD Act and the use of Oracle’s UK Sovereign Cloud for public sector data.
To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, whether the Government has conducted a legal assessment of the interaction between the US CLOUD Act and the use of Oracle’s UK Sovereign Cloud for public sector data.
Where cloud service providers may be subject to overseas legal obligations, including the United States CLOUD Act, departments are responsible as data controllers to assess and mitigate the associated risks.
The UK has an adequacy decision for certain transfers to the US under the UK Extension to the EU-US Data Privacy Framework. This decision assessed US laws and practices relating to government access to data, including the US CLOUD Act. This analysis is published and available on GOV.UK. Where adequacy is not relied upon, organisations must use alternative safeguards in line with Article 46 of the UK GDPR, such as standard contractual clauses.
Departments’ assessments enable them to identify and implement proportionate mitigations. These may include technical controls, such as encryption and strict access restrictions, contractual safeguards with service providers, and organisational measures governing data handling and oversight. Where relevant, departments must also assess the application of UK international data transfer provisions and ensure appropriate safeguards are in place.
To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, what assessment she has made of the financial impact on freelance workers in the UK television and creative industries of outstanding Covid-era Government-backed loans issued to limited company contractors, where new technologies have displaced competencies.
To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, what assessment she has made of the financial impact on freelance workers in the UK television and creative industries of outstanding Covid-era Government-backed loans issued to limited company contractors, where new technologies have displaced competencies.
The Department for Culture, Media and Sport recognises the vital contribution that freelancers provide to the cultural ecosystem of this country. We are taking a number of steps to support this part of the creative workforce, as set out in our Creative Industries Sector Plan, and that is why we will shortly announce the appointment of a Freelance Champion, who will advocate for the creative sector’s freelancers within government.
The government has made no assessment of the financial impact on freelance workers in the UK television and creative industries of Covid-era Government-backed loans issued to limited company contractors.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what alternative methods are available for individuals to demonstrate their right to work if they do not hold a Government digital identity.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what alternative methods are available for individuals to demonstrate their right to work if they do not hold a Government digital identity.
The Government has set out its ambition to move towards digital right to work checks. The detail of how alternative methods will operate in that future regime has not yet been finalised. Digital ID itself is under development following consultation on the proposals.
Until further policy and legislative detail is published, employers should continue to rely on the existing prescribed checking methods set out in Home Office guidance.
At present, individuals can demonstrate their right to work using the following prescribed methods:
- Manual document checks, by reviewing original acceptable documents (e.g. passports, or combinations such as a birth certificate and National Insurance evidence).
- Home Office online checks, using a share code where an individual holds digital immigration status (e.g. eVisa).
- Employer Checking Service (ECS) checks, where an individual cannot demonstrate their status through documents or the online service.
- A right to work check using a digital verification service provider.
Where carried out in accordance with Home Office guidance and statutory codes of practice, these checks provide employers with a statutory excuse and remain the lawful basis for verifying a right to work in the UK.
If she will make a statement on her departmental responsibilities.
If she will make a statement on her departmental responsibilities.
That this House regrets the use of scheduled hydration breaks during FIFA World Cup matches; further regrets the introduction of routine stoppages during normal playing time in association football; and calls upon the Government to legislate that a football match shall, save in cases of emergency, consist of two uninterrupted halves of normal playing time.
That this House regrets the use of scheduled hydration breaks during FIFA World Cup matches; further regrets the introduction of routine stoppages during normal playing time in association football; and calls upon the Government to legislate that a football match shall, save in cases of emergency, consist of two uninterrupted...
To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, if his Department will take legislative steps to enable proxy voting and remote attendance for councillors.
To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, if his Department will take legislative steps to enable proxy voting and remote attendance for councillors.
We remain committed to legislating on these important matters when Parliamentary time allows.
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, what her planned timetable is for publication of the Green Paper on access to nature.
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, what her planned timetable is for publication of the Green Paper on access to nature.
This Government committed in the 2025 Environmental Improvement Plan to bringing forward an Access to Nature Green Paper. This will provide an opportunity to explore options for improving and expanding access, test potential approaches, and gather robust evidence before any decisions are taken.
A timetable for publication has not yet been confirmed, but further updates will be provided in due course.
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, whether she has had discussions with stakeholders representing recreational users of water on the proposed Clean Water Bill.
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, whether she has had discussions with stakeholders representing recreational users of water on the proposed Clean Water Bill.
The Government will bring forward legislation through the Clean Water Bill, announced in the King’s Speech on 13 May, to deliver major reforms to the water system.
Public health will be at the heart of these reforms, alongside measures to strengthen regulation, improve water quality and tackle pollution at source, as set out in the Water White Paper.
Targeted engagement is already taking place with stakeholders across the water sector to support policy development.
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, if she will make an assessment of the potential merits of establishing a statutory duty on water companies to protect recreational users of waters in the forthcoming Clean Water Bill.
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, if she will make an assessment of the potential merits of establishing a statutory duty on water companies to protect recreational users of waters in the forthcoming Clean Water Bill.
The Government will bring forward legislation through the Clean Water Bill, announced in the King’s Speech on 13 May, to deliver major reforms to the water system.
Public health will be at the heart of these reforms, alongside measures to strengthen regulation, improve water quality and tackle pollution at source, as set out in the Water White Paper.
Targeted engagement is already taking place with stakeholders across the water sector to support policy development.
To ask the Secretary of State for Business and Trade, whether he has considered the potential impact of changes to EU customs duties for small parcels on the responsibility to promote knowledge exchange under the Florence Agreement.
To ask the Secretary of State for Business and Trade, whether he has considered the potential impact of changes to EU customs duties for small parcels on the responsibility to promote knowledge exchange under the Florence Agreement.
The Government has been following the development of the EU’s Union Customs Code reforms closely, including the removal of the €150 customs duty relief for small parcels from 1 July 2026. These are EU domestic measures, and we are engaging with the European Commission and UK businesses to understand the implications. My department has published guidance on gov.uk to support exporters to continue to access EU markets.
We recognise the importance of the UNESCO Florence Agreement in promoting the exchange of educational, scientific and cultural materials by reducing customs barriers that could impede knowledge exchange.
To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, what discussions she has had with the Chancellor of the Exchequer and the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care on the (a) contribution of choirs to public health, wellbeing and social prescribing and (b) potential role of...
To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, what discussions she has had with the Chancellor of the Exchequer and the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care on the (a) contribution of choirs to public health, wellbeing and social prescribing and (b) potential role of...
DCMS officials have had discussions with DHSC on the value of arts and culture to public health and wellbeing. DCMS also routinely meets with its arms-length body, Arts Council England (ACE), on their work to support people’s health, happiness and wellbeing via access to high-quality cultural and creative activities.
Research commissioned by DCMS' Culture and Heritage Capital Programme found that general engagement with culture and heritage positively impacts physical health, mental health, and productivity, which for adults, is valued at £18.6bn per year. For adults aged 65 years and over who attend a choir weekly, there is an estimated benefit on a society-wide level of £170m.
Adults over 50 years old who engage with cultural venues have delayed dementia onset, resulting in social care and NHS savings of £0.38bn.
The government supports the arts sector, including choirs and singing through ACE. For the 2024/25 financial year, ACE allocated £1.83 million in National Lottery Project Grants to projects classified under 'Choral’.
Within ACE’s National Portfolio Investment Programme, 334 organisations provide “creative health” programming. To support this work, the Arts Council provides an annual investment of £145 million to National Portfolio Organisations whose activities incorporate creative health.
ACE has also co-funded the National Academy of Social Proscribing (NASP) to deliver the Power of Music programme, which aims to transform how music supports dementia care within NHS systems.
Regarding the potential role of an extended Orchestra Tax Relief, fiscal policy and the design of tax reliefs are the remit of His Majesty’s Treasury.
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what assessment she has made of the potential merits of extending Orchestra Tax Relief to include amateur and professional choirs that produce live, acoustic concerts on a non‑commercial basis.
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what assessment she has made of the potential merits of extending Orchestra Tax Relief to include amateur and professional choirs that produce live, acoustic concerts on a non‑commercial basis.
Orchestra Tax Relief (OTR) provides tax relief on production costs and provided around £50 million of support in 2023-24. There is currently no other country in the world which offers similar relief to orchestras, and the aim is to recognise the artistic importance and cultural value of the sector.
To qualify for OTR, a concert must be performed by a group of at least 12 instrumentalists. The voice is not considered to be an instrument for the purposes of the relief. However, orchestra concerts with a vocal element are not excluded. Concerts featuring a choir may be eligible provided that the instrumentalists remain the primary focus. These rules help ensure OTR fulfils its objective of supporting and incentivising orchestra concerts specifically. The Government is not currently considering extending the relief to choirs.
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, for what reason performers are required to be instrumentalists to qualify for Orchestra Tax Relief.
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, for what reason performers are required to be instrumentalists to qualify for Orchestra Tax Relief.
Orchestra Tax Relief (OTR) provides tax relief on production costs and provided around £50 million of support in 2023-24. There is currently no other country in the world which offers similar relief to orchestras, and the aim is to recognise the artistic importance and cultural value of the sector.
To qualify for OTR, a concert must be performed by a group of at least 12 instrumentalists. The voice is not considered to be an instrument for the purposes of the relief. However, orchestra concerts with a vocal element are not excluded. Concerts featuring a choir may be eligible provided that the instrumentalists remain the primary focus. These rules help ensure OTR fulfils its objective of supporting and incentivising orchestra concerts specifically. The Government is not currently considering extending the relief to choirs.
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, whether she has considered extending Section 33 VAT recovery for charities and Community Interest Companies delivering statutory social care services on behalf of local authorities.
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, whether she has considered extending Section 33 VAT recovery for charities and Community Interest Companies delivering statutory social care services on behalf of local authorities.
Supplies of care services are exempt from VAT if they are supplied by eligible bodies, such as public bodies or charities. No VAT is charged to the consumer of the service, nor can the supplier recover VAT incurred in the course of providing the service.
Community interest companies (CICs) are not charities in law and must meet the criteria of being state-regulated in order to provide VAT-exempt care services. If CICs do not qualify for the VAT exemption, they charge VAT on the services they provide at the 20% standard rate.
Under Section 33 of the VAT Act 1994, certain bodies, including local authorities are able to recover VAT incurred in the course of their non-business activities. Non-business activities are broadly activities which are not undertaken to generate income, such as the provision of statutory health and social care services. Further information can be found here: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/revenue-and-customs-brief-10-2022-vat-business-and-non-business-activities/vat-business-and-non-business-activities
The objective of the Section 33 refund scheme for local authorities is to prevent these bodies from needing to use local taxation to fund their VAT costs. Extending the scheme to include charities and community interest companies would not meet this objective.
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what estimate she has made of public funding allocated to adult social care not spent on frontline social care services annually through irrecoverable VAT when services are delivered by charities and not‑for‑profit providers.
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what estimate she has made of public funding allocated to adult social care not spent on frontline social care services annually through irrecoverable VAT when services are delivered by charities and not‑for‑profit providers.
Supplies of care services are exempt from VAT if they are supplied by eligible bodies, such as public bodies or charities. No VAT is charged to the consumer of the service, nor can the supplier recover VAT incurred in the course of providing the service.
Community interest companies (CICs) are not charities in law and must meet the criteria of being state-regulated in order to provide VAT-exempt care services. If CICs do not qualify for the VAT exemption, they charge VAT on the services they provide at the 20% standard rate.
Under Section 33 of the VAT Act 1994, certain bodies, including local authorities are able to recover VAT incurred in the course of their non-business activities. Non-business activities are broadly activities which are not undertaken to generate income, such as the provision of statutory health and social care services. Further information can be found here: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/revenue-and-customs-brief-10-2022-vat-business-and-non-business-activities/vat-business-and-non-business-activities
The objective of the Section 33 refund scheme for local authorities is to prevent these bodies from needing to use local taxation to fund their VAT costs. Extending the scheme to include charities and community interest companies would not meet this objective.
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, for what reason local authorities are able to recover VAT under Section 33 of the VAT Act 1994 when equivalent social care services are delivered in‑house but not when those services are commissioned from charitable and not‑for‑profit providers.
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, for what reason local authorities are able to recover VAT under Section 33 of the VAT Act 1994 when equivalent social care services are delivered in‑house but not when those services are commissioned from charitable and not‑for‑profit providers.
Supplies of care services are exempt from VAT if they are supplied by eligible bodies, such as public bodies or charities. No VAT is charged to the consumer of the service, nor can the supplier recover VAT incurred in the course of providing the service.
Community interest companies (CICs) are not charities in law and must meet the criteria of being state-regulated in order to provide VAT-exempt care services. If CICs do not qualify for the VAT exemption, they charge VAT on the services they provide at the 20% standard rate.
Under Section 33 of the VAT Act 1994, certain bodies, including local authorities are able to recover VAT incurred in the course of their non-business activities. Non-business activities are broadly activities which are not undertaken to generate income, such as the provision of statutory health and social care services. Further information can be found here: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/revenue-and-customs-brief-10-2022-vat-business-and-non-business-activities/vat-business-and-non-business-activities
The objective of the Section 33 refund scheme for local authorities is to prevent these bodies from needing to use local taxation to fund their VAT costs. Extending the scheme to include charities and community interest companies would not meet this objective.
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what assessment she has made of the potential impact of irrecoverable VAT on charities, Community Interest Companies and other not‑for‑profit providers delivering statutory social care services under contract to local authorities.
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what assessment she has made of the potential impact of irrecoverable VAT on charities, Community Interest Companies and other not‑for‑profit providers delivering statutory social care services under contract to local authorities.
Supplies of care services are exempt from VAT if they are supplied by eligible bodies, such as public bodies or charities. No VAT is charged to the consumer of the service, nor can the supplier recover VAT incurred in the course of providing the service.
Community interest companies (CICs) are not charities in law and must meet the criteria of being state-regulated in order to provide VAT-exempt care services. If CICs do not qualify for the VAT exemption, they charge VAT on the services they provide at the 20% standard rate.
Under Section 33 of the VAT Act 1994, certain bodies, including local authorities are able to recover VAT incurred in the course of their non-business activities. Non-business activities are broadly activities which are not undertaken to generate income, such as the provision of statutory health and social care services. Further information can be found here: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/revenue-and-customs-brief-10-2022-vat-business-and-non-business-activities/vat-business-and-non-business-activities
The objective of the Section 33 refund scheme for local authorities is to prevent these bodies from needing to use local taxation to fund their VAT costs. Extending the scheme to include charities and community interest companies would not meet this objective.