Whether, in pursuit of Health and Safety requirements and fire safety regulations, slaughterhouse owners or operators can lawfully prevent any persons entering their premises until such time as those persons have registered their prescence with a nominated person on those premises; and whether owners or operators can lawfully require any...

Whether, in pursuit of Health and Safety requirements and fire safety regulations, slaughterhouse owners or operators can lawfully prevent any persons entering their premises until such time as those persons have registered their prescence with a nominated person on those premises; and whether owners or operators can lawfully require any...

Whether it is reasonable to prosecute a slaughterhouse owners or operator for presenting, or causing to be presented, a carcass for inspection to a meat hygiene inspector to which specified risk material (SRM) is attached when charges are levied for that inspector to detect and ensure the removal of that...

Whether it is reasonable to prosecute a slaughterhouse owners or operator for presenting, or causing to be presented, a carcass for inspection to a meat hygiene inspector to which specified risk material (SRM) is attached when charges are levied for that inspector to detect and ensure the removal of that...

Whether official veterinary surgeons or any other Meat Hygiene Service personnel have any statutory rights of entry to administration offices, maintained by slaughterhouse owners or operators for the conduct of their business, where no fresh meat or other foodstuff is handled. [HL 2878].

Whether official veterinary surgeons or any other Meat Hygiene Service personnel have any statutory rights of entry to administration offices, maintained by slaughterhouse owners or operators for the conduct of their business, where no fresh meat or other foodstuff is handled. [HL 2878].

Whether slaughterhouse owners or operators have any right of redress when official veterinary surgeons make unsubstantiated accusations as to their own staffs conduct in respect of compliance with the Fresh Meat (Hygiene and Inspection) Regulations 1995; and what form that redress should take. [HL 2873].

Whether slaughterhouse owners or operators have any right of redress when official veterinary surgeons make unsubstantiated accusations as to their own staffs conduct in respect of compliance with the Fresh Meat (Hygiene and Inspection) Regulations 1995; and what form that redress should take. [HL 2873].

Whether slaughterhouse owners or operators are entitled to supervise or otherwise check on the activities of their official veterinary surgeons and meat hygiene inspectors as to whether the officials are carrying out official duties on the premises, for which charges are made; and whether official veterinary surgeons can be asked...

Whether slaughterhouse owners or operators are entitled to supervise or otherwise check on the activities of their official veterinary surgeons and meat hygiene inspectors as to whether the officials are carrying out official duties on the premises, for which charges are made; and whether official veterinary surgeons can be asked...

Whether there is any measure in the Fresh Meat (Hygiene and Inspection) Regulations 1995, or in any other legislation, which prohibits slaughterhouse owners or operators from recording, by means of tape recording apparatus, conversations with their official veterinary surgeon or other meat hygiene services officials, or from making video recordings...

Whether there is any measure in the Fresh Meat (Hygiene and Inspection) Regulations 1995, or in any other legislation, which prohibits slaughterhouse owners or operators from recording, by means of tape recording apparatus, conversations with their official veterinary surgeon or other meat hygiene services officials, or from making video recordings...

Why Consumers for Health Choice and the National Association of Health Stores were not included by the Medicines Control Agency in the circulation of the consultation letter dated 29 April about membership of the Independent Review Panel for Advertising of Medicines; why earlier commitments to involve these organisations in relevant...

Why Consumers for Health Choice and the National Association of Health Stores were not included by the Medicines Control Agency in the circulation of the consultation letter dated 29 April about membership of the Independent Review Panel for Advertising of Medicines; why earlier commitments to involve these organisations in relevant...

Whether they intend that the lay membership of the proposed Independent Panel to review the working of the Medicines (Advertising and Monitoring of Advertising) Amendment Regulations 1999 (S.I. 167) will be drawn from consumers of dietary supplements and herbal remedies, and not from organisations which antagonistic to such supplements and...

Whether they intend that the lay membership of the proposed Independent Panel to review the working of the Medicines (Advertising and Monitoring of Advertising) Amendment Regulations 1999 (S.I. 167) will be drawn from consumers of dietary supplements and herbal remedies, and not from organisations which antagonistic to such supplements and...

What information they have about (a) the timetable; (b) the purpose; and (c) the extent of the forthcoming review by the European Commission of the Medicines Directive EC 65/66. [HL 1821].

What information they have about (a) the timetable; (b) the purpose; and (c) the extent of the forthcoming review by the European Commission of the Medicines Directive EC 65/66. [HL 1821].

How many representations have been received from (a) Members of Parliament; and (b) others about the proposals set out in the Medicines Control Agency consultation document MLX 249; and how many of those representations (a) broadly supported and (b) broadly opposed the proposals in that document. [HL 1822].

How many representations have been received from (a) Members of Parliament; and (b) others about the proposals set out in the Medicines Control Agency consultation document MLX 249; and how many of those representations (a) broadly supported and (b) broadly opposed the proposals in that document. [HL 1822].

What plans they have for improving dialogue with the horse industry, particularly in relation to health, welfare, taxation and betting, in order to influence the priority of equine matters within the Ministry of Agriculture Fisheries and Food, and communication, coordination and decision making. [HL 226].

What plans they have for improving dialogue with the horse industry, particularly in relation to health, welfare, taxation and betting, in order to influence the priority of equine matters within the Ministry of Agriculture Fisheries and Food, and communication, coordination and decision making. [HL 226].

Whether they intend to appoint a Minister for Equine Affairs, or a Minister within the Ministry of Agriculture Fisheries and Food dedicated to equine matters, to facilitate responses and coordinate other ministerial interests in the sector. [HL 227].

Whether they intend to appoint a Minister for Equine Affairs, or a Minister within the Ministry of Agriculture Fisheries and Food dedicated to equine matters, to facilitate responses and coordinate other ministerial interests in the sector. [HL 227].

What action they are taking to protect horses from pain and suffering caused by unqualified people acting as equine dentists. [HL 246].

What action they are taking to protect horses from pain and suffering caused by unqualified people acting as equine dentists. [HL 246].

Whether they consider that those involved in artificial insemination of horses should be properly qualified and subject to some sort of regulation. [HL 244].

Whether they consider that those involved in artificial insemination of horses should be properly qualified and subject to some sort of regulation. [HL 244].

Whether the regulators of the veterinary profession (the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons) are in favour of legislation to regulate (a) inseminators of horses and (b) equine dentists. [HL 245].

Whether the regulators of the veterinary profession (the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons) are in favour of legislation to regulate (a) inseminators of horses and (b) equine dentists. [HL 245].

How many submissions they received in response to their recent consultation exercise on the proposed new restrictions on the retail sale of Vitamin B6 supplements: and how many, and what percentage of those submissions (a) broadly supported and (b) broadly opposed the proposed restrictions. [HL 2725].

How many submissions they received in response to their recent consultation exercise on the proposed new restrictions on the retail sale of Vitamin B6 supplements: and how many, and what percentage of those submissions (a) broadly supported and (b) broadly opposed the proposed restrictions. [HL 2725].

When they expect to reach a final conclusion on the consultation exercise which they have recently conducted in relation to the proposed new restrictions on the retail sale of Vitamin B6 supplements; and when they expect to be able to respond to the recent report of the House of Commons...

When they expect to reach a final conclusion on the consultation exercise which they have recently conducted in relation to the proposed new restrictions on the retail sale of Vitamin B6 supplements; and when they expect to be able to respond to the recent report of the House of Commons...

How many dogs have been put down since the Dangerous Dogs (Amendment) Act 1997 came into force (a) under Section 1 and (b) under Section 3; and how often Section 4 of the Act is being used. [HL2442]. - Inc figs.

How many dogs have been put down since the Dangerous Dogs (Amendment) Act 1997 came into force (a) under Section 1 and (b) under Section 3; and how often Section 4 of the Act is being used. [HL2442]. - Inc figs.

Whether they will consider referring to the Monopolies and Mergers Commission and the Office of Fair Trading the proposed entry of News International companies into the United Kingdom radio industries through the purchase of one of only three independent national radio licence-holders; and, if not, why not. [HL 2264].

Whether they will consider referring to the Monopolies and Mergers Commission and the Office of Fair Trading the proposed entry of News International companies into the United Kingdom radio industries through the purchase of one of only three independent national radio licence-holders; and, if not, why not. [HL 2264].