1-20 of 51 results for tabledby:"Lord Adebowale"
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.286 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.002 seconds
- Search query
- tabledby:"Lord Adebowale"
- We searched for
- tablingMember_ses:298770
Type
House
Session
Year
Department
Member
Primary member
Answering member
Legislative stage
Legislation
Subject
More
Publisher
To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the long-term economic and social costs of under-identification and late diagnosis of neurodevelopmental conditions, relative to the costs of early identification and appropriate support, in light of the interim report of the Independent Review into Mental Health Conditions, ADHD...
To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the long-term economic and social costs of under-identification and late diagnosis of neurodevelopmental conditions, relative to the costs of early identification and appropriate support, in light of the interim report of the Independent Review into Mental Health Conditions, ADHD...
While no such specific assessment has been made regarding neurodevelopmental conditions, we know the economic and social costs of mental ill health is estimated to be approximately £300 billion.
The Independent Review into Mental Health Conditions, ADHD and Autism is independent of the Government and it is for the chair and vice chairs to determine the specific issues the review considers.
The final report, due in the summer, will make recommendations on how the Government, the health system, and wider public services can respond to increasing demand for support more fairly and effectively so that people receive the right support, at the right time, in the right place.
To ask His Majesty's Government whether the final report of the Independent Review into Mental Health Conditions, ADHD and Autism will address evidence on (1) the positive contribution made by identified and appropriately supported neurodivergent people to society and the economy, and (2) the long-term consequences for individuals, public services...
To ask His Majesty's Government whether the final report of the Independent Review into Mental Health Conditions, ADHD and Autism will address evidence on (1) the positive contribution made by identified and appropriately supported neurodivergent people to society and the economy, and (2) the long-term consequences for individuals, public services...
While no such specific assessment has been made regarding neurodevelopmental conditions, we know the economic and social costs of mental ill health is estimated to be approximately £300 billion.
The Independent Review into Mental Health Conditions, ADHD and Autism is independent of the Government and it is for the chair and vice chairs to determine the specific issues the review considers.
The final report, due in the summer, will make recommendations on how the Government, the health system, and wider public services can respond to increasing demand for support more fairly and effectively so that people receive the right support, at the right time, in the right place.
To ask His Majesty's Government what steps they are taking to ensure that the final report of the Independent Review into Mental Health Conditions, ADHD and Autism examines the relationship between neurodevelopmental under-identification and long-term disengagement from education and employment.
To ask His Majesty's Government what steps they are taking to ensure that the final report of the Independent Review into Mental Health Conditions, ADHD and Autism examines the relationship between neurodevelopmental under-identification and long-term disengagement from education and employment.
The Young People and Work independent investigation, led by Alan Milburn, considers the drivers of the rise in young people who are out of employment, education, and training (NEET). Increased reporting of ill health as a primary reason for being NEET among young people since 2015 is driven primarily by mental health and neurodevelopmental conditions.
The Independent Review into Mental Health Conditions, ADHD and Autism has been investigating changes in the diagnosis of these conditions and will be cross-referenced in the forthcoming first report of the Young People and Work review. The two reviews will need to continue to work together to consider the effects of under-diagnosis on employment and educational outcomes.
To ask His Majesty's Government, in light of the interim report of the Independent Review into Mental Health Conditions, ADHD and Autism, published on 31 March, what steps they are taking to ensure that the final report addresses race as a structural determinant of neurodevelopmental diagnosis and access to support,...
To ask His Majesty's Government, in light of the interim report of the Independent Review into Mental Health Conditions, ADHD and Autism, published on 31 March, what steps they are taking to ensure that the final report addresses race as a structural determinant of neurodevelopmental diagnosis and access to support,...
The Independent Review into Mental Health Conditions, ADHD and Autism is examining changes in population prevalence, levels of psychological distress, recorded diagnosis and referral, and perceived need for support. A key aim of the review is to understand how these relate to one another. The review is also considering how current support systems work in practice. This includes whether diagnosis has too often become the only gateway to help, and how earlier intervention and preventative support are best offered within and beyond the National Health Service. The review is independent of the Government, and it is for the chair and vice chairs to determine the specific issues the review considers.
The review’s interim report, published at the end of March, sets out the evidence reviewed so far on prevalence, describes the impact of rising demand for diagnosis and support, identifies where the evidence is uncertain, and outlines the key questions for the next phase. It does not offer final conclusions or recommendations.
The final report, due in the summer, will make recommendations on how the Government, the health system, and wider public services can respond to increasing demand for support more fairly and effectively so that people receive the right support, at the right time, in the right place.
A central concern of the review is that access to recognition, diagnosis, and support is uneven. The next phase will examine inequalities in prevalence, diagnosis, support, and outcomes in more detail, including variation by ethnicity, age, sex, deprivation, and other characteristics.
To ask His Majesty's Government, in light of the interim report of the Independent Review into Mental Health Conditions, ADHD and Autism, published on 31 March, whether the final report of the Review will address the evidence on Foetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder and the neurodevelopmental consequences of prenatal exposure to alcohol...
To ask His Majesty's Government, in light of the interim report of the Independent Review into Mental Health Conditions, ADHD and Autism, published on 31 March, whether the final report of the Review will address the evidence on Foetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder and the neurodevelopmental consequences of prenatal exposure to alcohol...
The Independent Review into Mental Health Conditions, ADHD and Autism is examining changes in population prevalence, levels of psychological distress, recorded diagnosis and referral, and perceived need for support. A key aim of the review is to understand how these relate to one another. The review is also considering how current support systems work in practice. This includes whether diagnosis has too often become the only gateway to help, and how earlier intervention and preventative support are best offered within and beyond the National Health Service. The review is independent of the Government, and it is for the chair and vice chairs to determine the specific issues the review considers.
The review’s interim report, published at the end of March, sets out the evidence reviewed so far on prevalence, describes the impact of rising demand for diagnosis and support, identifies where the evidence is uncertain, and outlines the key questions for the next phase. It does not offer final conclusions or recommendations.
The final report, due in the summer, will make recommendations on how the Government, the health system, and wider public services can respond to increasing demand for support more fairly and effectively so that people receive the right support, at the right time, in the right place.
A central concern of the review is that access to recognition, diagnosis, and support is uneven. The next phase will examine inequalities in prevalence, diagnosis, support, and outcomes in more detail, including variation by ethnicity, age, sex, deprivation, and other characteristics.
To ask His Majesty's Government whether the final report of the Independent Review into Mental Health Conditions, ADHD and Autism will assess whether framing rising diagnostic rates primarily as a demand management problem may compound existing inequalities in neurodevelopmental identification and support.
To ask His Majesty's Government whether the final report of the Independent Review into Mental Health Conditions, ADHD and Autism will assess whether framing rising diagnostic rates primarily as a demand management problem may compound existing inequalities in neurodevelopmental identification and support.
The Independent Review into Mental Health Conditions, ADHD and Autism is examining changes in population prevalence, levels of psychological distress, recorded diagnosis and referral, and perceived need for support. A key aim of the review is to understand how these relate to one another. The review is also considering how current support systems work in practice. This includes whether diagnosis has too often become the only gateway to help, and how earlier intervention and preventative support are best offered within and beyond the National Health Service. The review is independent of the Government, and it is for the chair and vice chairs to determine the specific issues the review considers.
The review’s interim report, published at the end of March, sets out the evidence reviewed so far on prevalence, describes the impact of rising demand for diagnosis and support, identifies where the evidence is uncertain, and outlines the key questions for the next phase. It does not offer final conclusions or recommendations.
The final report, due in the summer, will make recommendations on how the Government, the health system, and wider public services can respond to increasing demand for support more fairly and effectively so that people receive the right support, at the right time, in the right place.
A central concern of the review is that access to recognition, diagnosis, and support is uneven. The next phase will examine inequalities in prevalence, diagnosis, support, and outcomes in more detail, including variation by ethnicity, age, sex, deprivation, and other characteristics.
To ask Her Majesty’s Government how many children aged 16 or 17 have presented to their local authority as homeless, and how many of those were accommodated under the Children Act 1989, in (1) 2015–16, and (2) 2014–15.
To ask Her Majesty’s Government how many children aged 16 or 17 have presented to their local authority as homeless, and how many of those were accommodated under the Children Act 1989, in (1) 2015–16, and (2) 2014–15.
The Department for Education does not collect information on the number of children aged 16 or 17 who have presented to their local authority as homeless, or how many have been accommodated as a result of homelessness.
To ask Her Majesty’s Government how many children aged 16 or 17 have presented to their local authority as homeless in (1) 2015–16, and (2) 2014–15, and how many of those were (a) assessed under the Housing Act 1996, and (b) assessed and then accommodated under Part VII of the...
To ask Her Majesty’s Government how many children aged 16 or 17 have presented to their local authority as homeless in (1) 2015–16, and (2) 2014–15, and how many of those were (a) assessed under the Housing Act 1996, and (b) assessed and then accommodated under Part VII of the...
One person without a home is one too many. That is why we have maintained and protected homelessness prevention funding for local authorities through the local government finance settlement totalling £315 million by 2019/20. We have also increased central government funding to tackle homelessness to £139 million over the next four years.
The causes of youth homelessness are highly complex and our priority is to ensure that young people at risk of homelessness get the support they need. That is why we have also invested in the development of a Positive Pathway framework to help local authorities and their partners support young people to remain in the family home (where it is safe to do so) through a collaborative and integrated approach, as well as identifying the relevant support services needed should they become homeless. This includes supported accommodation as a starting point for 16 and 17 year olds.
Since 2002, 16 to 17 year olds have been classed as a priority need category and are owned a main homeless duty by their local authority. The number of 16 or 17 year olds who applied and were accepted as homeless was 580 in 2014-15, and 530 in 2015-16 (falling from 2,190 in 2009-10). All of these cases were dealt with under the homelessness provisions of Part 7 of the Housing Act 1996.
We do not hold details on the age of applicants who reported to their local authority but were ineligible or not homeless.
To ask Her Majesty’s Government what progress they have made in transferring healthcare in police custody to the NHS from April 2015; why that transfer has been delayed; what plans they have to ensure that work done by the police and NHS England to date is not lost; and how...
To ask Her Majesty’s Government what progress they have made in transferring healthcare in police custody to the NHS from April 2015; why that transfer has been delayed; what plans they have to ensure that work done by the police and NHS England to date is not lost; and how...
My rt honFriend the Home Secretary has decided that a reallocation from the overall police settlement in respect of custody healthcare costs would not be appropriate at this time. Funding responsibility for police custody healthcare services will therefore remain with Police and Crime Commissioners who will have flexibility to prioritise resource towards police custody healthcare, based on local needs. We expect that in doing so, they will wish to continue to develop the close partnerships which have already been established with local NHS England commissioners as part of the work on police custody healthcare arrangements in ensuring the most appropriate local commissioning, and healthcare arrangements.
We will continue to support such partnerships to build upon the work done to date and, particularly, to work with them to explore the scope for new models for better integrating the commissioning of the range of physical and mental health initiatives and interventions available.
To ask Her Majesty’s Government, further to the statement by Baroness Williams of Trafford on 12 October (HL Deb, cols 36–40) on the right to buy, whether (1) there will be a timeframe within which housing associations are expected to build extra homes, and (2) there will be a minimum...
To ask Her Majesty’s Government, further to the statement by Baroness Williams of Trafford on 12 October (HL Deb, cols 36–40) on the right to buy, whether (1) there will be a timeframe within which housing associations are expected to build extra homes, and (2) there will be a minimum...
The National Housing Federation voluntary agreement states that housing associations and the Government share a mutual objective to ensure that replacement homes are delivered as quickly as possible.
Whilst aiming for replacement within two years, the default position is that housing associations will have flexibility to replace homes within a three year period. The Housing and Planning Bill will also seek to introduce clauses that will speed up the planning system so that new homes can be delivered quicker.
Under the agreement, housing associations may exercise discretion not to sell properties provided through supported housing as defined by Part V of the Housing Act 1985.
To ask Her Majesty’s Government how many children in the United Kingdom live with parents who misuse alcohol; and what action they are taking to tackle this issue.
To ask Her Majesty’s Government how many children in the United Kingdom live with parents who misuse alcohol; and what action they are taking to tackle this issue.
To ask Her Majesty’s Government what plans are in place regularly to monitor the impact of the reforms of out-of-work benefits on levels of equality in the United Kingdom, with particular reference to the socio-economic status of those affected by the changes.
To ask Her Majesty’s Government what plans are in place regularly to monitor the impact of the reforms of out-of-work benefits on levels of equality in the United Kingdom, with particular reference to the socio-economic status of those affected by the changes.
asked Her Majesty's Government:How much money they have spent on public health awareness campaigns to reduce the spread of HIV in each year since 1986.
asked Her Majesty's Government:How much money they have spent on public health awareness campaigns to reduce the spread of HIV in each year since 1986.
| £ million | |
| 1986-87 | 7.600 |
| 1987-88 | 11.210 |
| 1988-89 | 10.000 |
| 1989-90 | 12.000 |
| 1990-91 | 10.000 |
| 1991-92 | 11.000 |
| 1992-93 | 11.230 |
| 1993-94 | 9.410 |
| 1994-95 | 9.870 |
| 1995-96 | 8.060 |
| £ million | |
| 1996-97 | 0.820 |
| 1997-98 | 1.375 |
| 1998-99 | 1.400 |
| 1999-2000 | 1.400 |
| 2000-01 | 1.500 |
| 2001-02 | 1.550 |
| 2002-03 | 1.600 |
| 2003-04 | 1.700 |
| 2004-05 | 1.700 |
| 2005-06 | 1.700 |
| 2006-07 | 2.750 |
| 2007-08 | 2.750 |
What plans they have to increase the pooled drug treatment budget for 2007–08.
What plans they have to increase the pooled drug treatment budget for 2007–08.
Whether they are reviewing the announced allocations for the pooled drug treatment in (a) 2006–07, and (b) 2007–08.
Whether they are reviewing the announced allocations for the pooled drug treatment in (a) 2006–07, and (b) 2007–08.
What is the percentage increase in the pooled drug treatment for (a) 2006–07, and (b) 2007–08.
What is the percentage increase in the pooled drug treatment for (a) 2006–07, and (b) 2007–08.
When they will make a decision on the allocation of the pooled drug treatment budget for 2006–07.
When they will make a decision on the allocation of the pooled drug treatment budget for 2006–07.
What estimate they have made of the total amount of mainstream local expenditure spent on drug treatment services on top of the pooled treatment budget in (a) 2003–04; (b) 2004–05; and (c) 2005–06; and what the total amount is projected to be in (i) 2006–07, and (ii) 2007–08.
What estimate they have made of the total amount of mainstream local expenditure spent on drug treatment services on top of the pooled treatment budget in (a) 2003–04; (b) 2004–05; and (c) 2005–06; and what the total amount is projected to be in (i) 2006–07, and (ii) 2007–08.
| Year | £ Million (estimate)* |
| 2003–04 | 200 |
| 2004–05 | 204 |
| 2005–06 | 208 |
| 2006–07 | 212 |
| 2007–08 | 216 |
| * these data have been sourced from the National Treatment Agency |
What will be the total allocation for the pooled drug treatment budget in (a) 2006–07, and (b) 2007–08.
What will be the total allocation for the pooled drug treatment budget in (a) 2006–07, and (b) 2007–08.