1-20 of 2,966 results for tabledby:"Lord Berkeley"
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.439 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.009 seconds
- Search query
- tabledby:"Lord Berkeley"
- We searched for
- tablingMember_ses:299133
Type
House
Session
More
Year
Department
More
Member
More
Primary member
Answering member
More
Legislative stage
Legislation
More
Subject
More
Publisher
To ask His Majesty's Government, for each of the last five calendar years, how many appeals have been made against magistrates' court decisions which have rejected defendants' claims of exceptional hardship in proceedings concerning drivers liable to disqualification under the totting-up provisions; and how many of those appeals were successful.
To ask His Majesty's Government, for each of the last five calendar years, how many appeals have been made against magistrates' court decisions which have rejected defendants' claims of exceptional hardship in proceedings concerning drivers liable to disqualification under the totting-up provisions; and how many of those appeals were successful.
The Ministry of Justice publishes quarterly data on appeals against magistrates’ court decisions heard in the Crown Court in the Criminal Court Statistics Quarterly release which can be downloaded from the Criminal Court Statistics landing page here: Criminal court statistics - GOV.UK. Table C11 provides details of appeals heard at the Crown Court.
However, data is not centrally recorded on the specific grounds of appeal, including whether an appeal relates to the rejection of an exceptional hardship argument in proceedings concerning drivers liable to disqualification under the totting-up provisions.
This information may be contained within individual court records. However, identifying and reviewing relevant cases would require a manual examination of those records and could be provided only at disproportionate cost.
To ask The Senior Deputy Speaker, in respect of the evacuation of the House of Lords at 15:00pm on Thursday 2 July, (1) to what extent, if any, were members and staff of the House of Commons involved, (2) to what extent was the London Fire Brigade informed and involved,...
To ask The Senior Deputy Speaker, in respect of the evacuation of the House of Lords at 15:00pm on Thursday 2 July, (1) to what extent, if any, were members and staff of the House of Commons involved, (2) to what extent was the London Fire Brigade informed and involved,...
The Senior Deputy Speaker has asked me, as Chair of the Services Committee, to respond on his behalf. The House of Commons was fully involved in the evacuation drill. For the purposes of evacuation, the Parliamentary Estate is treated as a single zone. Accordingly, the House of Commons Chamber was also evacuated during a debate.
The London Fire Brigade was informed in advance of the exercise. Its control room was notified and remained in contact throughout the drill. The local Borough Commander and the Station Commander from Soho were also informed. A representative from the London Fire Brigade's Risk Management Team attended and observed the exercise in order to provide feedback. In addition, the Chief Inspector from the Crown Premises Fire Safety Inspectorate attended to observe the evacuation.
The evacuation took a total of 15 minutes from commencement of the exercise until all members of the public and staff, excluding security personnel and designated observers, had left the building.
To ask His Majesty's Government how much of the £487 million transferred from the Crown Estate to the Consolidated Fund in 2025–26 was subsequently allocated for use by the Royal Family.
To ask His Majesty's Government how much of the £487 million transferred from the Crown Estate to the Consolidated Fund in 2025–26 was subsequently allocated for use by the Royal Family.
The Crown Estate’s revenue account profit is paid in full to the Consolidated Fund. In exchange, the Government provides the Sovereign Grant to support the Monarch’s official business. The Grant does not provide an income to any member of the royal family.
As set out in the Sovereign Grant Review published on 25 June 2026, the Royal Trustees have determined that a reference rate of 20.5 per cent is appropriate for the funding formula from 2027-28 onwards, which equates to a 2027-28 Grant amount of £99.9 million, a reduction against the £137.9 million in 2026-27.
As the Sovereign Grant Act 2011 currently restricts the Grant amount from being set lower than the preceding year’s amount, the Government has committed to bring forward legislation to enable the Grant for 2027-28 to be set at this lower amount, to reflect the adjustment now that the temporary additional funding for Buckingham Palace Reservicing is no longer needed.
To ask His Majesty's Government what discussions they have had with the European Commission on the UK’s involvement in the Military Mobility Package.
To ask His Majesty's Government what discussions they have had with the European Commission on the UK’s involvement in the Military Mobility Package.
In May last year, the UK agreed a Security and Defence Partnership (SDP) with the European Union, as part of this Government’s commitment to strengthening European security, supporting economic growth and reinforcing NATO.
The UK wants to enable the efficient movement of military personnel and equipment across Europe in support of NATO’s plans and recognises that this is a shared objective with the EU. Closer cooperation on military mobility benefits both the UK and our European partners by helping forces move more quickly and effectively across the continent, strengthening collective deterrence and supporting European security.
Under the SDP, this includes cooperation on military mobility. In that context, the UK is progressing its applications to participate in the PESCO Military Mobility project and the Network of Logistic Hubs. We are also maintaining a dialogue with EU partners on the Military Mobility Package, including through recent senior-level discussions in Brussels on the UK’s involvement in practical terms.
To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill (HL425), what is the estimated cost of full electrification of the East West Rail route compared to the lower capital cost of discontinuous electrification.
To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill (HL425), what is the estimated cost of full electrification of the East West Rail route compared to the lower capital cost of discontinuous electrification.
The costs of electrifying the full East West Rail route versus partial (discontinuous) electrification will depend on a number of factors including the final scope for the railway’s design and location of overhead line equipment. This is yet to be finalised and will be developed in light of feedback received in the East West Rail Company’s latest public consultation, which closed on 9 June this year.
To ask His Majesty's Government whether they plan to close the Pullman service on long-distance Great Western Railway trains.
To ask His Majesty's Government whether they plan to close the Pullman service on long-distance Great Western Railway trains.
There are currently no plans to close the Pullman dining service on Great Western Railway’s long-distance services. Department for Transport officials continue to engage closely with the operator to ensure that passenger expectations are met, including through the provision of high-quality catering options.
To ask His Majesty's Government what consideration they have given to putting HS2 Limited into administration and seeking alternative bids for the construction of HS2 from Birmingham to Manchester.
To ask His Majesty's Government what consideration they have given to putting HS2 Limited into administration and seeking alternative bids for the construction of HS2 from Birmingham to Manchester.
The Government has tasked the new leadership of HS2 Ltd with undertaking a comprehensive reset to ensure the project is delivered in a controlled way and at the lowest reasonable cost. Bringing in alternative delivery arrangements at this stage in the project would add further delay and cost.
It is the Government's long-term aim to see a full new railway between Birmingham to Manchester. This will not be a revival of HS2 and what will be delivered will be considered by a feasibility study working with local partners.
To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the remarks by the Secretary of State for Transport on 19 May that there has been an “obscene increase in time and costs” associated with the construction of HS2 (HC Deb, col 416), why they are continuing with the construction of HS2; what...
To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the remarks by the Secretary of State for Transport on 19 May that there has been an “obscene increase in time and costs” associated with the construction of HS2 (HC Deb, col 416), why they are continuing with the construction of HS2; what...
The Secretary of State for Transport provided an update to the House via her latest Parliamentary report on HS2 on 19 May, covering the progress achieved in resetting the programme in recent months. This includes the government's rationale for continuing with the construction of the programme, discussions with main suppliers to manage contracts in taxpayers' interests, and steps taken to strengthen commercial controls and improve delivery performance. This government put HS2 Ltd under new management, which has tightened spending controls with new specialist roles scrutinizing every payment to contractors and suppliers, and is reviewing contracts to ensure the right incentives are in place to drive delivery.
To ask His Majesty’s Government how much HS2 Limited paid consultants in the last year; and on which aspects of the project they worked.
To ask His Majesty’s Government how much HS2 Limited paid consultants in the last year; and on which aspects of the project they worked.
My Lords, HS2 Ltd spent £77.8 million on consultancy in 2025-2026. This targeted advice was used to support the fundamental reset and its scope and cost. This is a significant undertaking in terms of complexity, pace and scale, and could not all be done in-house. Under new leadership, HS2 Ltd is being transformed into a simplified, more cost-effective company, with more than 300 back-office roles already removed and an absolute focus on delivery.
To ask His Majesty's Government when they intend to publish a response to the consultation Exploring the role of alternative clean heating solutions, which closed on 10 February; and whether the response will be published in advance of the publication of the proposed Energy Independence Bill.
To ask His Majesty's Government when they intend to publish a response to the consultation Exploring the role of alternative clean heating solutions, which closed on 10 February; and whether the response will be published in advance of the publication of the proposed Energy Independence Bill.
We are currently reviewing evidence from our consultation on alternative clean heat solutions and will publish a government response in due course.
To ask His Majesty's Government what is the current estimate of the cost to complete the HS2 work between Old Oak Common and Handsacre, including the interchange station on the Great Western Mainline at Old Oak Common.
To ask His Majesty's Government what is the current estimate of the cost to complete the HS2 work between Old Oak Common and Handsacre, including the interchange station on the Great Western Mainline at Old Oak Common.
The Government announced in May 2026, the expected cost of delivering HS2 is now in the range of £87.7 - 102.7 billion. This is expressed in a mixed price base, including the cash outturn of works to date and the costs of future work excluding inflation.
These ranges cover the cost of the whole programme, stretching from London Euston to Birmingham Curzon Street and to the connection to the West Coast Main Line at Handsacre Junction, which will enable HS2 services to continue to the Northwest and Scotland. This includes the cost of HS2 work between Old Oak Common and Handsacre as well as the interchange station at Old Oak Common.
To ask His Majesty's Government what role they intend renewable liquid fuels to play in meeting current and future Carbon Budgets.
To ask His Majesty's Government what role they intend renewable liquid fuels to play in meeting current and future Carbon Budgets.
Government recognises that renewable liquid fuels could play a role in meeting Carbon Budgets through a limited role in decarbonising heat for some off‑gas‑grid properties. However, evidence to date has highlighted challenges around affordability and sustainability, including the availability of sustainable feedstocks and the higher cost to consumers compared with other low‑carbon heating options. For this reason, the Government has been clear that further evidence is required before decisions are taken on whether and how such fuels could be supported at scale.
As part of this evidence‑gathering process, the Government recently consulted on the role of alternative clean heating solutions, including renewable liquid fuels such as HVO. A Government Response will be published in due course.
To ask His Majesty's Government what is the estimated cost of providing full electrification of the East West Rail route before it opens to traffic, compared with the estimated cost of providing full electrification five years after it opens.
To ask His Majesty's Government what is the estimated cost of providing full electrification of the East West Rail route before it opens to traffic, compared with the estimated cost of providing full electrification five years after it opens.
As set out in East West Rail’s Spring 2026 consultation, the Government has committed to the discontinuous electrification of East West Rail, which involves a lower capital cost whilst minimising construction and environmental impacts.
To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of whether delivery robots constitute (1) carriages, or (2) mechanically propelled vehicles, for the purposes of existing highways legislation.
To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of whether delivery robots constitute (1) carriages, or (2) mechanically propelled vehicles, for the purposes of existing highways legislation.
The Government recognises the current legal framework does not provide the certainty businesses need to invest, which is why we have committed to introduce a new Low-speed Zero Emission Vehicle category to regulate micromobility vehicles, including pavement robots, when Parliamentary time allows. This regulation will also be designed to ensure any negative impacts to blind and partially sighted people are mitigated.
The Micromobility Team in the Department for Transport is responsible for pavement robots, and there are currently no staff dedicated to working solely on delivery robot policy, with work on this policy area being conducted as business-as-usual activity by officials with wider responsibilities.
To ask His Majesty's Government how many members of staff in the Department for Transport are working on policy relating to delivery robots.
To ask His Majesty's Government how many members of staff in the Department for Transport are working on policy relating to delivery robots.
The Government recognises the current legal framework does not provide the certainty businesses need to invest, which is why we have committed to introduce a new Low-speed Zero Emission Vehicle category to regulate micromobility vehicles, including pavement robots, when Parliamentary time allows. This regulation will also be designed to ensure any negative impacts to blind and partially sighted people are mitigated.
The Micromobility Team in the Department for Transport is responsible for pavement robots, and there are currently no staff dedicated to working solely on delivery robot policy, with work on this policy area being conducted as business-as-usual activity by officials with wider responsibilities.
To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the impact of delivery robots on blind and partially sighted pedestrians.
To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the impact of delivery robots on blind and partially sighted pedestrians.
The Government recognises the current legal framework does not provide the certainty businesses need to invest, which is why we have committed to introduce a new Low-speed Zero Emission Vehicle category to regulate micromobility vehicles, including pavement robots, when Parliamentary time allows. This regulation will also be designed to ensure any negative impacts to blind and partially sighted people are mitigated.
The Micromobility Team in the Department for Transport is responsible for pavement robots, and there are currently no staff dedicated to working solely on delivery robot policy, with work on this policy area being conducted as business-as-usual activity by officials with wider responsibilities.
To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of whether delivery robots operating on pavements comply with the provisions of the Highways Act 1980.
To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of whether delivery robots operating on pavements comply with the provisions of the Highways Act 1980.
The Government recognises the current legal framework does not provide the certainty businesses need to invest, which is why we have committed to introduce a new Low-speed Zero Emission Vehicle category to regulate micromobility vehicles, including pavement robots, when Parliamentary time allows. This regulation will also be designed to ensure any negative impacts to blind and partially sighted people are mitigated.
The Micromobility Team in the Department for Transport is responsible for pavement robots, and there are currently no staff dedicated to working solely on delivery robot policy, with work on this policy area being conducted as business-as-usual activity by officials with wider responsibilities.
To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the extent to which local authorities can restrict or prohibit the use of delivery robots on pavements.
To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the extent to which local authorities can restrict or prohibit the use of delivery robots on pavements.
The Government recognises the current legal framework does not provide the certainty businesses need to invest, which is why we have committed to introduce a new Low-speed Zero Emission Vehicle category to regulate micromobility vehicles, including pavement robots, when Parliamentary time allows. This regulation will also be designed to ensure any negative impacts to blind and partially sighted people are mitigated.
The Micromobility Team in the Department for Transport is responsible for pavement robots, and there are currently no staff dedicated to working solely on delivery robot policy, with work on this policy area being conducted as business-as-usual activity by officials with wider responsibilities.
To ask His Majesty's Government who will be the promoter of the Crewe to Manchester section of High Speed Rail; and whether they intend to let contracts on a cost-plus basis in a similar way to those let for Phase 1.
To ask His Majesty's Government who will be the promoter of the Crewe to Manchester section of High Speed Rail; and whether they intend to let contracts on a cost-plus basis in a similar way to those let for Phase 1.
HS2 Ltd continue to support the promotion of the High Speed Rail (Crewe-Manchester) Bill which will be adapted to deliver only the section of route necessary for Northern Powerhouse Rail. No decisions have been taken on the long-term delivery strategy on contracting choices for the Northern Powerhouse Rail programme at this stage.
Our long-term ambition is to improve capacity and connectivity between Birmingham and Manchester with a new rail line. This will not be a reinstatement of HS2 and no decisions have been taken on the exact specification, route or the approach to implementing or contracting the project.
We will learn lessons from the implementation of HS2 to take the time necessary to undertake the development work to underpin these decisions.
To ask His Majesty's Government whether they intend to publish any further reports, previously commissioned by HS2 Ltd, on the risk of settlement of areas around Crewe.
To ask His Majesty's Government whether they intend to publish any further reports, previously commissioned by HS2 Ltd, on the risk of settlement of areas around Crewe.
This report https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/hs2-phase-2b-select-committee-crewe-to-manchester-understanding-the-ground-risk-across-the-cheshire-plain was commissioned and published as a comprehensive report into the ground risk north of Crewe across the Cheshire plain.
The Government does not expect to publish any further information.