Skip to main content

1-20 of 216 results for tabledby:"Lord Spens"

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

What action, if any, was taken to investigate the detailed allegations of corruption within the Prison Service outlined in the letters of 18 June 1998 sent by Peter Clarence Fosters lawyers, Janes Solicitors, to the Home Secretary and the Prime Minister. [HL 3541].

Asked by
Lord Spens (Crossbench)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
19 July 1999
Reference
604 c78-9WA; HL 3541
House
House of Lords
Whether the Prison Service was in breach of its regulations when in 1996, it permitted a serving inmate, Peter Clarence Foster, to participate as a registered informant in Operation Outreach. [HL 3540]. - Ref to 24 March 1999 at 598 c159WA.
Asked by
Lord Spens (Crossbench)
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
19 July 1999
Reference
604 c77-8; HL 3540
House
House of Lords

How they intend to guarantee the safety and well-being of Peter Clarence Foster when he is returned to this country after his extradition from Australia. [HL 3539].

Asked by
Lord Spens (Crossbench)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
19 July 1999
Reference
604 c77WA; HL 3539
House
House of Lords

Whether the report of the inspectors in the matter of the inquiry into Mirror Group Newspapers plc can now be published, and, if not, whether they will consider an interim report. [HL 1551].

Asked by
Lord Spens (Crossbench)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
30 March 1999
Reference
HL 1551; 599 c34WA
House
House of Lords

Who authorised the expenditure on the recent court proceedings against Kevin Maxwell; and whether this expenditure will be examined by the National Audit Office to see whether this expenditure was cost or benefit effective. [HL 1550].

Asked by
Lord Spens (Crossbench)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
30 March 1999
Reference
HL 1550; 599 c34WA
House
House of Lords

What were the estimated costs of the recent proceedings before the Vice-Chancellor, the Right Hon. Sir Richard Scott, against Mr Kevin Maxwell, including the costs of the three Queen's Counsel, two juniors and 13 departmental lawyers appearing against Mr Maxwell. [HL 1548]. - Inc figures.

Asked by
Lord Spens (Crossbench)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
30 March 1999
Reference
599 c33WA; HL 1548
House
House of Lords

Whether it can be in the public interest for individuals to be subject to court proceedings without legal representation for the respondent, in circumstances comparable to the case of Kevin Maxwell. [HL 1549].

Asked by
Lord Spens (Crossbench)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
30 March 1999
Reference
HL 1549; 599 c33-4WA
House
House of Lords

What is the public interest in their continued efforts to extradite Peter Clarence Foster from Australia when the offences for which he stands charged have already been dropped or dismissed against a colleague with costs. [HL 1577].

Asked by
Lord Spens (Crossbench)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
30 March 1999
Reference
599 c37WA; HL 1577
House
House of Lords

Whether the National Audit Office will be asked to examine the costs of the extradition proceedings against Peter Clarence Foster to establish whether the costs to date are justified. [HL 1578]. - No.

Asked by
Lord Spens (Crossbench)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
30 March 1999
Reference
599 c37WA; HL 1578
House
House of Lords

What is the purpose of "Operation Outreach" conducted by the Derbyshire police during the years 1995 to 1997; and whether it is ongoing; and whether Peter Clarence Foster, currently under process of extradition from Australia by the serious Fraud Office, is or was a registered informant to the Derbyshire police...

Asked by
Lord Spens (Crossbench)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
24 March 1999
Reference
598 c159WA; HL 1575
House
House of Lords

Whether the Serious Fraud Office has to clear any intended extradition proceedings in Australia through the office of the Attorney General or any other govt office before commencing proceedings. [HL 1276].

Asked by
Lord Spens (Crossbench)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
10 March 1999
Reference
HL 1276; 598 c36WA
House
House of Lords

Whether the cost to date of £434,696 of the extradition proceedings against Peter Clarence Foster is justified in view of the failure of their case against 'another person' mentioned in the written answer of the Lord Chancellor on 22 February (103WA) on similar charges where full costs were awarded against...

Asked by
Lord Spens (Crossbench)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
10 March 1999
Reference
HL 1277; 598 c36WA
House
House of Lords

Who in the Serious Fraud Office is accountable for the expenditure of applications such as that involved in the extradition of Peter Clarence Foster. [HL 1278].

Asked by
Lord Spens (Crossbench)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
10 March 1999
Reference
598 c35WA; HL 1278
House
House of Lords

What are the full details and the amount of money involved in each of the 16 charges for which Peter Clarence Foster is being extradited from Australia. [HL 1279]. - Includes figures.

Asked by
Lord Spens (Crossbench)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
10 March 1999
Reference
598 c37WA; HL 1279
House
House of Lords

What are the charges against Peter Clarence Foster for which he is being extradited from Australia by the Serious Fraud Office. [HL 954]. - Inc figures.

Asked by
Lord Spens (Crossbench)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
22 February 1999
Reference
597 c103WA; HL 954
House
House of Lords

What is the cost to date of the action of the Serious Fraud Office against Peter Clarence Foster, whose extradition from Australia they are currently pursuing. [HL 953].

Asked by
Lord Spens (Crossbench)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
22 February 1999
Reference
597 c103WA; HL 953
House
House of Lords

Whether the Ministers were consulted and, if so, which Minister in 1989 was involved in the decision not to disclose the 1988 judgment of Lord Grantchester QC in the Licensed Dealers' Tribunal in the matter of TWH Management Ltd. - [HL 574].

Asked by
Lord Spens (Crossbench)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
27 January 1999
Reference
HL 574; 596 c155WA
House
House of Lords

In the light of the facts disclosed in the letter of 4 January 1989 (reported in the Mail on Sunday, 22 November 1998) from Mr W B Willott of the Department of Trade and Industry to Mrs Olsen of the Serious Fraud Office and the Government's acknowledgement that the judgment...

Asked by
Lord Spens (Crossbench)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
27 January 1999
Reference
HL 626; 596 c155WA
House
House of Lords

Whether they will place a copy of the 4 January 1989 letter from Mr W B Willott of the Department of Trade and Industry, dealing with his concerns about the possible fatal effect on the Guinness trials of the judgment of Lord Grantchester QC on the Licensed Dealers' Tribunal in...

Asked by
Lord Spens (Crossbench)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
27 January 1999
Reference
HL 573; 596 c155WA
House
House of Lords

Whether they will now institute an inquiry into the conduct of Department of Trade and Industry officials in connection with their failure to disclose the report and recommendations of the Licensed Dealers Tribunal in the matter of TWH Management Ltd to the inspectors appointed to investigate the affairs of Guinness...

Asked by
Lord Spens (Crossbench)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
14 December 1998
Reference
595 c122WA
House
House of Lords