As outlined in the written ministerial statement (HLWS1491) on 27 March 2026, we appointed Sir Jim Harra, former HMRC First Permanent Secretary, to take over as Chief Executive of NS&I on an interim basis, to provide a fresh start for NS&I’s next phase of development.

NS&I is also part-way through delivering its Business Transformation Programme which aims to modernise NS&I’s operations and systems. NS&I and HMT will consider the lessons learned from this operational error, alongside those identified by the National Audit Office and Public Accounts Committee on programme delivery, to strengthen how NS&I works with its outsourced delivery partners going forward.

On 26 March 2026, the Minister for Pensions confirmed to Parliament that NS&I had identified an issue where the estates of deceased customers were not always repaid money from all of their accounts following a bereavement claim. These errors happened because the search process used when handling a bereavement claim failed to identify all NS&I products. The issue has been resolved for current and new bereavement claims and robust measures have been introduced to ensure this does not happen again.

Working with external consultants, NS&I reviewed 34 million customer records to identify its tracing issue. On 19 May 2026, the Minister for Pensions updated Parliament that the remediation population was estimated at up to 34,000 cases with a total value of £367 million. HM Treasury is working closely with NS&I to progress the remediation scheme, which is planned to conclude by mid-2027.

NS&I published a delivery plan that it will follow to ensure proactive, timely contact and will publish an update on progress against this plan on a quarterly basis.

NS&I announced it would seek to proactively reunite estates with combined deposits or holdings of £10 or more, providing compensatory interest of at least the Bank of England plus one percentage point rate, or any higher contractual interest accrued under the products’ terms and conditions, in line with Financial Ombudsman Service guidance.

I refer the Noble Lord to the answer he referenced in his question. As I said in that answer, we will confirm further details of the Envoy's work in due course.

Since his appointment in February, the UK Special Envoy for Post-Holocaust Issues has made excellent progress against his Terms of Reference for the role, including attending the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance plenary meeting in Argentina from 1-4 June, as the head of the UK's delegation, and meeting with the President of the World Jewish Restitution Organisation on 6 May to discuss the UK's ongoing commitment to the Terezin Declaration on Holocaust-Era Assets. Further details of the Envoy's work, including his overseas visits, will be confirmed in the usual way in due course.

We continue to engage with Poland on post-Holocaust issues and tackling antisemitism, including through our Embassy in Warsaw. For instance, in February we facilitated a Community Security Trust best practice visit to Poland through our programme fund to support post-Holocaust initiatives for financial year 2025-26. Further details of our engagement with Poland on these issues, including any planned visits by the Special Envoy, will be confirmed in the usual way in due course.

It has not proved possible to respond to this question in the time available before Prorogation. Ministers will correspond directly with the Member.

It has not proved possible to respond to this question in the time available before Prorogation. Ministers will correspond directly with the Member

While the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology (DSIT) is the Information Commissioner's Office (ICO)’s sponsor department within government and provide ICO’s Freedom of Information (FOI) funding as a Grant-in-Aid, government policy for Freedom of Information sits with the Cabinet Office.

The government is committed to ensuring sufficient funding for the ICO’s FOI responsibilities. Spending review budget allocations until Financial Year 2028-29 will be finalised by DSIT and will be published in due course.

British citizens living overseas who are registered as overseas electors are permissible donors under electoral law and may donate to UK political parties.

Political parties are required to take all reasonable steps to check that donations come from permissible donors and to report donations above statutory thresholds to the Electoral Commission. It is a criminal offence to accept, facilitate or disguise an impermissible donation.

Following the publication of the independent Rycroft Review, the Government set out (attached) its intention to implement the Review’s first recommendation by introducing an annual cap of £100,000 on political donations from overseas electors.

British citizens living overseas who are registered as overseas electors are permissible donors under electoral law and may donate to UK political parties.

Political parties are required to take all reasonable steps to check that donations come from permissible donors and to report donations above statutory thresholds to the Electoral Commission. It is a criminal offence to accept, facilitate or disguise an impermissible donation.

Following the publication of the independent Rycroft Review, the Government set out (attached) its intention to implement the Review’s first recommendation by introducing an annual cap of £100,000 on political donations from overseas electors.

The cost thresholds above which public authorities are not obliged to comply with a Freedom of Information request are set out in secondary legislation. Any changes to FOI legislation would be subject to Parliamentary scrutiny.

The Government is committed to Freedom of Information and continues to monitor the performance and implementation of the Act to ensure it is operating as intended by Parliament.

The Bill will provide non-means tested legal help and advocacy for bereaved families at inquests where a public authority is named as an interested person. As under the current system, the amount paid will depend on the work carried out by the provider on the inquest, which will be different for each case depending on its duration and complexity.

The Public Office (Accountability) Bill will provide non-means tested legal aid to bereaved family members at any inquests where a public authority is named as an interested person.

Under the Bill, an “individual” is defined as being a member of another individual’s family if they are relatives (whether of the full blood or half blood or by marriage or civil partnership), they are cohabitants (as defined in Part 4 25 of the Family Law Act 1996), or one has parental responsibility for the other.

Legal aid consists of legal help and advocacy.

a. Legal help covers advice, assistance and preparation for an inquest but not advocacy at the hearing. Under the Bill’s expansion, multiple bereaved family members will be able to receive non-means tested legal help services where a public authority is named as an interested person.

b. Advocacy covers the instruction of an advocate (usually a barrister) to prepare for and attend the inquest hearing(s) to make submissions. The Bill limits advocacy funding to one member of each family – in practice, this level of service will be granted to the first family member to apply. We believe that one legally aided advocate should in most cases be sufficient to support each family through the inquest hearing and that it is reasonable to ask members of the same family to collaborate in the instruction of a single advocate.

The Government took the cost pressures facing adult social care, including changes to employer National Insurance Contributions and increases to the National Living Wage, into account as part of the wider consideration of local government spending within the 2024 Autumn Budget process.

To enable local authorities to deliver key services such as adult social care, the Government has made available up to £3.7 billion of additional funding for social care authorities in 2025/26.

In addition, the Spending Review 2025 allows for an increase of over £4 billion of funding available for adult social care in 2028/29 compared to 2025/26.

Under the Care Act 2014, local authorities are required to shape their local markets, and ensure that people have a range of high-quality, sustainable and person-centred adult social care and support options available to them, and that they can access the services that best meet their needs.  Care providers entering and exiting is a normal part of a functioning market, and local authorities should have appropriate contingency plans in place depending on the services being provided.

The Care Quality Commission’s (CQC) Market Oversight Scheme monitors the financial health of typically the largest and potentially most difficult-to-replace providers in the adult social care sector. The CQC will notify local authorities if they consider it likely that any provider’s services will be disrupted because of business failure.   Since January 2024, there have been no such notifications.

The number of adult social care providers deregistered by the CQC from 1 January 2024, broken down by local authority, is shown in the attached table.

There is no available estimate of the number of care workers who are self-employed. The only available data on self-employment within the adult social care sector is for personal assistants who are employed by direct payment recipients.

Skills for Care estimates that in 2024/25, there were 100,000 personal assistants (PAs) working for direct payment recipients, and of these, 10% were self-employed. There is no equivalent data available on self-employed PAs who are working for individuals funding their own care.

The Department has not made an assessment of how many of these workers meet the criteria for self-employment.

Local authorities are best placed to understand and plan for the needs of their population, which is why, under the Care Act 2014, they are tasked with the duty to shape their care market to meet the diverse needs of all people. In meeting this duty, local authorities must consider ways of promoting a workforce with the appropriate skills and working conditions. Local authorities should work with care providers on an ongoing basis to arrive at a shared understanding of what it costs to run high quality and sustainable care provision, taking into account local circumstances.

We expect local authorities to pay sustainable fee rates that meet the costs of delivering care, which is why the Market Sustainability and Improvement Fund will provide over £1 billion for adult social care to local authorities over 2025/26. This can be used to target increasing fee rates paid to adult social care.

Under the Care Act 2014, local authorities are tasked with the duty to shape their care markets to meet the diverse needs of all local people. The Care and Support Statutory Guidance is the accompanying statutory guidance for local authorities and partner agencies, which sets out the principles that should underpin market shaping and commissioning activity, including a focus on outcomes and wellbeing.

The Care Quality Commission (CQC) assesses how well local authorities are delivering their duties under Part 1 of the Care Act 2014, including those related to market shaping and commissioning. To date, the CQC has published over 60 assessment reports, which are publicly available on the CQC’s website. To date, none have yet been found to be failing in its market shaping duty. If the CQC identifies that a local authority has failed to deliver one or more of its Care Act duties, the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care (Wes Streeting MP) has legal powers to intervene.

Under the Care Act 2014, local authorities are tasked with the duty to shape their care markets to meet the diverse needs of all local people. The Care and Support Statutory Guidance is the accompanying statutory guidance for local authorities and partner agencies, which sets out the principles that should underpin market shaping and commissioning activity, including a focus on outcomes and wellbeing.

The Care Quality Commission (CQC) assesses how well local authorities are delivering their duties under Part 1 of the Care Act 2014, including those related to market shaping and commissioning. To date, the CQC has published over 60 assessment reports, which are publicly available on the CQC’s website. To date, none have yet been found to be failing in its market shaping duty. If the CQC identifies that a local authority has failed to deliver one or more of its Care Act duties, the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care (Wes Streeting MP) has legal powers to intervene.