Skip to main content

Business question from Paul Flynn (Labour) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 2 March 2006. It occurred during Business statement on Business of the House.


Business of the House

When can we have a debate on early-day motion 1316, which draws attention to the dangers of contaminated air in aircraft? [That this House is concerned that medical and scientific evidence shows that as many as 200,000 passengers a year are exposed to air contaminated with organophosphates and hydrocarbon compounds on UK registered aircraft and that the number of contaminated events in 2005 reported by the British Airline Pilots Association, were a record high; regrets the lack of UK research into the danger of exposure to pyrolised engine oils; notes that effective filtration systems costing less than £10,000 per aircraft are available and calls for their mandatory use to reduce serious risks to the health of the travelling public and operating crews; and believes that passengers should be informed when they have been exposed to air contamination on UK registered aircraft.] That matter has been raised by the British Air Line Pilots Association, which is greatly anxious about the incidents that occurred last year in which 200,000 passengers on British planes were exposed to contamination from fumes from organophosphates and hydrocarbons. Since the early-day motion was tabled on 9 January, there has been a further incident in a plane flying from Belfast airport whereby the pilot became incapacitated and could not react to his safety instructions. The other pilot had to take over, and the flight was recalled to Belfast airport. There is a serious danger of a catastrophe—


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
443 c406-7 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Air pollution Aircraft Contamination
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk