Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Jack Straw (Labour) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 8 June 2006. It occurred during Business statement on Business of the House.


Business of the House

The hon. Gentleman’s first question was in respect of the inquiry into the 7 and 21 July terrorist outrages last summer. May I say that full account is always taken of inquiry reports and that there was a meeting recently of the Cabinet Committee on international terrorism, which looked carefully at the conclusions of the GLA inquiry and discussed many of its findings? That will continue, because it is in everybody’s interests that we learn the lessons from what happened last 7 July, and indeed on 21 July. On the issue of the death of al-Zarqawi, let me say that my right hon. Friend the Prime Minister has described it—on this occasion, I happen to think that it is entirely appropriate that it should be so described—as good news, because that man was an evil butcher who was killing Iraqis, as well as coalition forces, in large numbers. Nothing was going to stop him, I am afraid, until he was stopped in this way. I may say that I hope that we can put on record our admiration for all those in the Iraqi forces and the coalition forces, as well as others, who were responsible for his apprehension. I understand entirely what the hon. Gentleman says about the case for a full debate on foreign policy. I am alive to that, as is my right hon. Friend the Chief Whip. Our only difficulty is finding the time, alongside many other requests. I say to the hon. Gentleman that there is an opportunity to raise those matters in the Wednesday debate on Europe next week, because Iraq— [Interruption.] Well, he makes a sedentary gesture—a polite but critical sedentary gesture, indicating that he does not entirely accept what I am saying. I have to say to him that before the European Council will be Iraq, Iran and the middle east, so there is every reason for him to use that opportunity, along with his right hon. and hon. Friends, to debate those matters next week. The hon. Gentleman raised the issue of Strasbourg as the seat of the European Parliament. That arrangement is now friendless, except for those in the host country. I am sad to say that, as my right hon. Friend the Member for Rotherham (Mr. MacShane) has just reminded me, that was one of a number of errors made by the Major Government in 1992, because they set that arrangement in concrete. We all have to deal with that. The hon. Gentleman also asked about fixed-term contracts. I do not think that there is a case for them, and I would put this request way below, for example, a request for a debate on the tax system. I hope very much that the Liberal Democrats will use their next Opposition day for a debate on it, because what is clear from the announcements being made today is that they are ditching higher rates for the rich for higher taxation for everyone.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
447 c403-4 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Cabinet Inquiries Greater London European Parliament Iraq Foreign policy Ministers Terrorism
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk