Skip to main content

Prime Minister's question asked in the House of Commons, by Greg Hands (Conservative). It was answered on Wednesday, 7 February 2007 on behalf of the Prime Minister.


Engagements

Question
The Prime Minister will know that in 2002 Abu Hamza had his assets frozen by the Chancellor, yet the following year was allowed to transfer a flat to his son, who has himself been convicted of terrorist offences. Why, five years later, has that glaring loophole in our anti-terror defences still not been closed?
Answer

I do not agree that we have a loophole in the way in which we deal with terrorist finances. The most important thing—we have shown this in relation to the Abu Hamza case—is that we are prepared to take tough action against people who incite racism or extremism in our country. Let me just point out to the hon. Gentleman that every time we have introduced tougher measures on terrorism in the House—[Interruption.] Oh, yes, the Conservative party, while calling for tough measures in general, has voted against them in particular.


Secondary information

Type
Oral question
Reference
456 c840 
Session
2006-07
Oral question type
1st Supplementary
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Legislation Terrorism Abu Hamza
Link
View this Prime Minister's question on www.publications.parliament.uk