Skip to main content

Oral question asked in the House of Commons, by James Clappison (Conservative). It was answered on Monday, 19 March 2007 on behalf of the Home Office.


Departmental Co-ordination

Question
Under the Government, the immigration and nationality directorate has presided over a substantial increase in net migration of up 185,000 in 2005—the last year for which we have figures. Is any other part of the Home Office co-ordinating that figure with the demands of migration on housing infrastructure and the implications for population density, or does it remain the case that the Government see ““no obvious upper limit”” to migration, to use the words of the Home Secretary’s predecessor?
Answer

The hon. Gentleman makes an important point, which is precisely the reason for the need to reconfigure and improve our services in the Home Office. Three of the main issues, among many others with which we deal—international migration, international crime and international terrorism—have grown exponentially in the past decade and a half. We therefore need to undertake improvements and consider reconfiguration to concentrate on managing migration, countering international terrorism and coping with international crime. As part of that, we proposed a migration advisory commission, which would examine independently—and offer independent advice on—a range of issues related to the optimum amount of immigration. That would mean consideration of wider issues than purely and narrowly defined economic matters.


Secondary information

Type
Oral question
Reference
458 c560 
Session
2006-07
Oral question type
Supplementary
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Immigration controls Immigration Reorganisation Home Office
Link
View this Oral question on www.publications.parliament.uk