Proceeding contribution from Alan Johnson (Labour) in the House of Commons on Monday, 15 October 2007. It occurred during Urgent question on Clostridium Difficile.
Clostridium Difficile
Look, there is no correlation here. The simple fact is that trusts must live within the extremely generous funding that they are getting from the centre. Trusts have to be in surplus, not in deficit—that is a simple fact of life. A similar point applies to reconfigurations. I reject the notion that those who are reconfiguring or those who are moving back from being in deficit to being in surplus cannot have patient safety. That is a ludicrous proposition. It does not cost a fortune to have patient safety. It is about washing hands and ensuring that people do not get complacent about prescribing antibiotics. It is about the simplest of procedures, which, as was mentioned in an earlier contribution, the ward sister and the matron would know everything about. This is not lots of money. I reject the argument that we should give up on saying to PCTs, ““You should not be in deficit—you should spend your money on taxpayers' behalf wisely””, in order to promote patient safety. It is possible to do both.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 464 c570
- Session
- 2006-07
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Debts Hospitals Disease control Infectious diseases NHS Clostridium Disclosure of information Finance MRSA Standards Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 12:42:58 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_1263692/answer
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_1263692/answer
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_1263692/answer