Written question asked by Lord Morris of Manchester (Labour), in the House of Lords. It was answered by Lord Drayson (Labour) on Tuesday, 30 October 2007.
Gulf War Illnesses
- Question
- asked Her Majesty's Government:Further to the Written Answer by Lord Drayson on 1 October (WA 221) about Gulf War syndrome, what representations have been forwarded to them from Dr Malcolm Hooper, Emeritus Professor of Medical Chemistry at the University of Sunderland, about the Answer; what response they will be making; and whether they will take any action consequent upon his comments; and
- Answer
-
The noble Lord wrote to me on 1 October 2007, providing copies of two letters from Professor Hooper. In a letter dated 26 September, Professor Hooper indicated that he felt there had been prevarication over the implementation of individual appeals that had been determined by the Pensions Appeal Tribunal. He suggested, too, that the use of ““Gulf War Syndrome”” as an umbrella term to cover any recognised medical condition caused by service and connected to the 1990-91 Gulf conflict was an attempt to evade our responsibility to Gulf veterans described as suffering signs and symptoms of ill-defined conditions (SSIDC). The Government do not accept these points. The Ministry of Defence provides compensation for all accepted injuries or illnesses due to service. The department acts in good faith to give effect to the individual decisions of the Pensions Appeal Tribunal. As has been made clear on many previous occasions, the Government accept that some people are ill due to their service in the Gulf and compensate wherever there is disablement attributed to or aggravated by service, and this may include SSIDC. Our responsibility for Gulf veterans whose SSIDC is accepted as due to service is recognised by the award of a war pension; this is unaffected by any specific use of the term ““Gulf War Syndrome””. Professor Hooper also suggested that MoD-sponsored research into cancers among Gulf veterans was flawed because it would not have picked up early diagnosis. This is incorrect; the study*, which found no excess of cancer among veterans, employed the records of the NHS central register and analysed data from 1 April 1991. In a letter dated 24 September, Professor Hooper referred to my Answer of 1 October 2007 (Official Report, col. WA 222) on motor neurone disease. A written reply will be sent in due course. A copy of Professor Hooper's letter and the department's reply will be placed in the Library of the House. "* Macfarlane G et al. Incidence of cancer among UK Gulf war veterans: cohort study. British Medical Journal, 13 December 2003, Vol 327, p1373."
Secondary information
- Type
- Written question
- Reference
- 5409; 695 c183-4WA
- Session
- 2006-07
- Related items
- Subjects
- Appeals Cancer Iraq-Kuwait conflict Motor neurone disease War pensions Gulf War syndrome Pensions Appeal Tribunal Veterans
- Link
- View this Written question on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2022-06-01 12:29:11 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_1266796
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_1266796
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_1266796