Skip to main content

Business question from Ann Cryer (Labour) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 5 February 2009. It occurred during Business statement on Business of the House.


Business of the House

Can time be found next week for an urgent debate on early-day motion 426, which I tabled? [That this House notes the disproportionate impact on building societies of the Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS) levy, resulting from the failure of Bradford and Bingley plc, the Icelandic banks and London Scottish Bank; recognises that building societies' share of the levy, approximately £200 million per annum in each of the next three years, is equivalent to about 15 per cent. of the sector's pre-tax profit for 2007-08 financial year ends; notes that building societies' share of the levy for years beyond 2011 is uncertain, but could well be higher than £200 million per annum; acknowledges that the impact on building societies contrasts starkly with the banking sector, where the FSCS levy is typically well below five per cent. of pre-tax profits over a similar accounting period; further notes that the current allocation of the FSCS levy works to the detriment of building societies' members, their savers and borrowers; acknowledges that no building society has ever made a call on the FSCS or its predecessor schemes; and calls on the Government to introduce a more equitable scheme for funding the insurance of deposits of failed banks.] The motion now has 119 signatures, but not many from the Conservatives.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
487 c976-7;487 c974-5 
Session
2008-09
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Building societies Financial Services Compensation Scheme
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk