Business question from William Cash (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 2 April 2009. It occurred during Business statement on Business of the House.
Business of the House
In the Leader of the House's reply to the shadow Leader of the House on the question of privilege, she indicated that the Attorney-General's view implied that there should be some action in the courts. Does the Leader of the House understand that the question of what constitutes privilege is a matter for the courts, but the question of whether a matter is privileged is for the Committee on Standards and Privileges? In those circumstances, will she make certain either that the Attorney-General's opinion is placed in the Library—the Attorney-General is adviser to the House of Commons and the House of Lords on these matters—or that the Attorney-General comes to the House and explains exactly what her reasoning is?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 490 c1062-3
- Session
- 2008-09
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Attorney General Parliamentary privilege Committee on Standards and Privileges Deposited papers
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-22 01:17:54 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_1411630/-question
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_1411630/-question
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_1411630/-question