Skip to main content

Business question from David Winnick (Labour) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 23 April 2009. It occurred during Business statement on Business of the House.


Business of the House

There is undoubtedly public disquiet about the second homes allowances, although hon. Members are absolutely justified in claiming for the accommodation that is essential when they are away from home. However, if the new proposal is put forward, does my right hon. and learned Friend accept that people are bound to think that hon. Members are being paid extra money just for turning up to do our job? If a flat-rate payment is established, no documentary evidence will be required to show how we have spent the money, so what are we supposed to do—pocket all the money that we do not spend legitimately within the rules? The proposal needs much more explanation. I hope that there will be a vote next week to reform the system, but it is open to question whether the proposal as it stands is the sort of reform that will reassure the public that all is well.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
491 c371 
Session
2008-09
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Disclosure of information Allowances Housing Members
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk