Engagements

Answer: I am pleased that the hon. Gentleman has raised this issue, because I think it is important that I and the Justice Secretary can say something to him about the concerns that he has raised. This is an issue where an injunction has been awarded, but it has been awarded in the context that it has to remain secret and people are not told what the outcome is generally. The Justice Secretary has talked to the parties concerned and is looking into this issue. He will discuss the matter personally with the hon. Gentleman, and I hope that on the basis of what he suggests progress can be made not just in this case but more generally, to clear up what is an unfortunate area of the law.

This is an answer to the Prime Minister's question asked on Wednesday, 14 October 2009 by Peter Bottomley (Conservative).

Question: Carter-Ruck, experts in reputation management, are reported as saying that their original injunction gave them the power to prevent what was said in Parliament from being reported. No court should grant such an order and I intend to report the solicitors to the Law Society for asking for the injunction. Will the Prime Minister see whether it is possible that any court that grants a secret injunction or emergency injunction should have a copy placed in the Library of the House of Commons and the Press Gallery, if necessary hiding the name of a child or details of grave national security? Will the Prime Minister also ask whether any such emergency order can be reviewed the next working day at the Court of Appeal?

Secondary information

Type: Oral answer to question
Reference: 497 c294
Session: 2008-09
Chamber / Committee: House of Commons chamber
Related items: Trafigura: Injunctions
Wednesday, 28 October 2009
Written questions
House of Commons
Subjects: Injunctions Parliamentary reporting
Link: View this Oral answer to question on www.publications.parliament.uk