Skip to main content

Oral answer to question provided on Monday, 12 July 2010 in the House of Commons, by Lord Gove (Conservative), Department for Education.


Building Schools for the Future Programme

Answer

I very much take the point made by my hon. Friend. One of the defects of the BSF scheme was that, in many parts of the country where there was real need as a result of a growing population, the money was not there to provide new school places. As a result of our capital review, we will ensure that where there is additional population pressure and additional basic need, particularly in primary schools, which BSF did not cover, we will provide the support that is necessary. I look forward to working with my hon. Friend to help the parents and teachers in those two great schools.

This is an answer to the Oral question asked on Monday, 12 July 2010 by Philip Davies (Conservative).

Question
In the catchment areas for both Ilkley and Bingley grammar schools, there has been excessive house building, so there is no longer sufficient capacity on their existing sites to meet local demand. Can my right hon. Friend ensure that those schools that need new build to increase capacity to meet local demand will still receive capital expenditure?

Secondary information

Type
Oral answer to question
Reference
513 c639 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Building schools for the future programme Bingley Ilkley
Link
View this Oral answer to question on www.publications.parliament.uk