Proceeding contribution from Lord Young of Cookham (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 22 July 2010. It occurred during Business statement on Business of the House.
Business of the House
I commend the ingenuity of the hon. Lady's question. She will have seen the written ministerial statement setting out the reasons behind the provisional conclusion, which concerned whether an acceptable contract price was achieved and whether the risk of cost and time overruns were addressed. That is the right way to go and it represents the best value for money for the British taxpayer. Of course, that conclusion could not have been reached without the assent of the Treasury.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 514 c565
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Construction Airports Finance St Helena
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 20:14:54 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_1538185/answer
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_1538185/answer
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_1538185/answer