Written question asked by Bob Ainsworth (Labour) on Wednesday, 17 November 2010, in the House of Commons. It was due for an answer on Friday, 19 November 2010. It was answered by Liam Fox (Conservative) on Tuesday, 30 November 2010 on behalf of the Ministry of Defence.
Trident
- Question
- To ask the Secretary of State for Defence pursuant to the answer of 11 November 2010, Official Report, column 449W, on Trident value for money review, what external assistance and technical consultancy his Department commissioned for the Trident value for money review; and how much it spent on each piece of work commissioned.
- Answer
-
£70,000 was spent on assessing the scope for improving efficiency within the Atomic Weapons Establishment (AWE) and a further £120,000 was spent reviewing site infrastructure and processes across the AWE estate. In addition, £10,000 was spent modelling cost and risk on the successor deterrent submarine.Overall, the value for money review produced savings of £1.2 billion and deferred spending of up to £2 billion over the next 10 years.
Secondary information
- Type
- Written question
- Reference
- 25781; 519 c752W
- Session
- 2010-12
- Related items
- Subjects
- Trident
- Link
- View this Written question on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2020-08-06 11:07:59 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_1560565
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_1560565
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_1560565