Written question asked by Lord Maginnis of Drumglass (Ulster Unionist Party), in the House of Lords. It was answered by Baroness Browning (Conservative) on Thursday, 19 May 2011.
Extradition: Gary McKinnon
- Question
- To ask Her Majesty’s Government, further to the answer by Lord Wallace of Saltaire on 23 March (Official Report, col. 729–31), whether, in the Gary McKinnon court hearing in 2009, the Crown Prosecution Service in responding to Lord Justice Burnton admitted that allegations by the United States about the cost of computer damage was "hearsay and inadmissible"; and whether this matter has been duly considered by the Home Office.
- Answer
-
Within the scheme of the Extradition Act 2003 my right honourable friend the Home Secretary is not able to consider the evidence or information submitted in support of an extradition request—this is a matter for the courts. The only issue which the Home Secretary must now determine is whether Mr McKinnon's extradition to the US would be compatible with his human rights.
Secondary information
- Type
- Written question
- Reference
- 8941; 727 c358WA
- Session
- 2010-12
- Related items
- Subjects
- Evidence Extradition USA Hacking McKinnon, Gary
- Link
- View this Written question on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2013-11-20 03:36:18 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_1616678
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_1616678
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_1616678