Written question asked by Gordon Banks (Labour) on Tuesday, 27 March 2012, in the House of Commons. It was due for an answer on Monday, 16 April 2012. It was answered by Peter Luff (Conservative) on Monday, 23 April 2012 on behalf of the Ministry of Defence.

AgustaWestland

Question: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence (1) whether his Department had discussions with Augusta Westland prior to its decision to withdraw work contracts from Vector Aerospace;

Answer: [holding answer 16 April 2012]: The decision by AgustaWestland not to extend their subcontracts with Vector Aerospace for the repair and overhaul of Sea King and Lynx parts was taken for commercial reasons. The selection of subcontractors is a choice for the prime contractor. AgustaWestland did notify the Ministry of Defence in advance of this decision and of their intent to provide employment opportunities in Yeovil for staff impacted by this decision. They also provided assurances that these revised arrangements would not adversely impact either the provision of military capability or the cost of providing that capability.We regularly review and amend our contracts with industry, including with AgustaWestland, to ensure they remain current and fit for purpose.

Secondary information