Written question asked by Lord Hain (Labour), in the House of Commons. It was due for an answer on Thursday, 29 February 1996. It was answered by Lord Lyell of Markyate (Conservative) on Thursday, 29 February 1996 on behalf of the Attorney General.
Attorney General
- Question
- What assessment he has made of Sir Richard Scott's conclusion in section G18.104 that the class claims made in the Matrix Churchill trial should have had no place in a criminal trial.
Secondary information
- Type
- Written question
- Reference
- 16999; 272 c742W;272 c722W
- Session
- 1995-96
- Subjects
- Arms trade Documents Iraq Trials Arms to Iraq Inquiry Matrix Churchill
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2013-11-24 22:46:13 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_220628
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_220628
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_220628