Skip to main content

1-20 of 177 results for subject:"Matrix Churchill"

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

What discussion he had with Alan Moses QC before the collapse of the Matrix Churchill trial.

Asked by
Tam Dalyell (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
2 April 1996
Reference
22392; 275 c102W
House
House of Commons
Answered by
Lord Lyell of Markyate (Conservative)
Answering body
Attorney General
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
18 March 1996
Reference
274 c16
House
House of Commons
Answered by
Lord Lyell of Markyate (Conservative)
Answering body
Attorney General
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
18 March 1996
Reference
274 c18-9
House
House of Commons
Answered by
Lord Lyell of Markyate (Conservative)
Answering body
Attorney General
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
18 March 1996
Reference
274 c16
House
House of Commons
If he will place in the Library a copy of his submission on behalf of the Government to the consultation on public interest immunity law.
Asked by
Llew Smith (Labour)
Answering body
Attorney General
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
18 March 1996
Reference
274 c16; 19404
House
House of Commons
1st supplementary on disclosure of information in Matrix Churchill trial.
Asked by
Llew Smith (Labour)
Answering body
Attorney General
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
18 March 1996
Reference
274 c16
House
House of Commons
Supplementary on withholding of information from Alan Moses.
Asked by
Tam Dalyell (Labour)
Answering body
Attorney General
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
18 March 1996
Reference
274 c18-9
House
House of Commons

That this House is astonished at the ignorance displayed by the Secretary of State for Defence at Question Time on 5th March when responding to questions put by the honourable Member for Neath and the supplementary by the honourable Member for Linlithgow concerning the section G9 of the Scott Report,...

Primary sponsor
Lord Hain (Labour)
Type
Early day motions
Date
5 March 1996
Reference
578
House
House of Commons
Answered by
Michael Portillo (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
5 March 1996
Reference
273 c143
House
House of Commons
Answered by
Michael Portillo (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
5 March 1996
Reference
273 c143
House
House of Commons
What assessment he has made of the findings of the Scott report relating to his Dept.
Asked by
Lord Hain (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
5 March 1996
Reference
273 c143; 16846
House
House of Commons
1st supplementary on Matrix Churchill trial.
Asked by
Lord Hain (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
5 March 1996
Reference
273 c143
House
House of Commons

Which British representatives interviewed Hussein Kamel in Jordan and on what dates; and if the interview included questions on Mr Kamel's involvement with Matrix Churchill. - As I made clear in my letter of 2 October 1995 to the hon. Member, any such contracts would, by their nature, be confidential....

Asked by
Ann Clwyd (Labour)
Answering body
Foreign and Commonwealth Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
4 March 1996
Reference
17874; 273 c20W
House
House of Commons

On what authority Treasury Solicitors Dept in the Matrix Churchill case instructed counsel 'to seek to avoid the disclosure of the documents covered by the various public interest immunity certificates'.

Asked by
Earl Russell (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
29 February 1996
Reference
569 c114-5WA
House
House of Lords

What assessment he has made of Sir Richard Scott's conclusion in section G18.104 that the class claims made in the Matrix Churchill trial should have had no place in a criminal trial.

Asked by
Lord Hain (Labour)
Answering body
Attorney General
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
29 February 1996
Reference
16999; 272 c742W;272 c722W
House
House of Commons

Pursuant to 272 c17, when he read the letter from the Deputy Prime Minister dated 11th September; and various other questions on same.

Asked by
Lord Hain (Labour)
Answering body
Attorney General
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
29 February 1996
Reference
272 c743W;272 c723W; 16990;16992;16991;16989
House
House of Commons

The report of the Rt Hon Sir Richard Scotts Inquiry: Government press pack including Response on PII, Policy on control of exports to Iran and Iraq, Role of the Attorney General, Customs and Excise prosecution procedures, Matrix Churchill case, Disclosure of documents to the defence, Britains export control system and...

Deposited by
HM Government
Type
Deposited papers
Date
28 February 1996
Reference
Dep/3 2829
House
House of Commons

What assessments were made by (a) his departmental officials and (b) departmental Ministers of the reliability of information provided by Mr Paul Henderson, whilst managing director of Matrix Churchill, on the status of the Iraqi; military procurement network. - (Holding answer 16 February 1996).

Asked by
Llew Smith (Labour)
Answering body
Foreign and Commonwealth Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
26 February 1996
Reference
15692; 272 c347W;272 c326-7W
House
House of Commons

Lords debate on motion that this House takes note of Scott Report (The Inquiry into the Export of Defence Equipment and Dual-Use Goods to Iraq) (HC 115 1995/96). Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Lord Fraser of Carmyllie
Answering member
Lord Jenkins of Hillhead
Department
Department of Trade and Industry
Type
Parliamentary proceedings
Date
26 February 1996
Reference
569 c1228-358
House
House of Lords

Debate on a motion for the adjournment on the Scott Report (HC 115 1995/96). (Inquiry into Export of Defence Equipment and Dual-Use Goods to Iraq). Motion that the House do now adjourn negatived on division (319 to 320). (Inc ref to documents setting out current position in relation to informing...

Lead member
Lord Lang of Monkton
Answering member
Robin Cook
Department
Department of Trade and Industry; Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster
Type
Adjournment debates
Date
26 February 1996
Reference
272 c589-694
House
House of Commons