Written question asked by Mike O'Brien (Labour), in the House of Commons. It was due for an answer on Wednesday, 28 June 1995. It was answered by Lord Lyell of Markyate (Conservative) on Wednesday, 28 June 1995 on behalf of the Attorney General.
Attorney General
- Question
- Pursuant to his Answer to the honourable Member for Swansea East of 19th June, Official Report, columns 68-70W, on discussions between counsel for the Crown and for Roger Levitt, precisely what pleas were in issue at each discussion and specifically when the Crown decided for the purposes of discussions or plea that it was appropriate for Levitt not to admit to actual theft by himself; what indications as to the acceptability of possible pleas had been made by the defence to the Crown before the judge discussed sentence on Mr Roger Levitt on 22 November 1993. - Inc details and ref to 262 c700-1W.
Secondary information
- Type
- Written question
- Reference
- 262 c703-4W
- Session
- 1994-95
- Subjects
- Fraud Prosecutions Plea bargaining Levitt, Roger
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2022-08-21 09:22:36 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_290243
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_290243
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_290243