Skip to main content

1-20 of 46 results for subject:"Levitt, Roger"

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask the Solicitor General, what was the cost to the public purse, through Crown Prosecution Service, Serious Fraud Office and central funds, of the Roger Levitt case; and what was the amount paid to the Counsel for the Prosecution and the Counsel for the Defence. - Includes figures.

Asked by
Colin Pickthall (Labour)
Answering body
Solicitor General
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
26 November 1999
Reference
99329; 339 c231W
House
House of Commons

To ask the Solicitor General, if he will ask the Bar Council to publish the findings and the reasons for the findings of the disciplinary hearing held by the Bar Council into the handling of the Roger Levitt case.

Asked by
Colin Pickthall (Labour)
Answering body
Solicitor General
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
26 November 1999
Reference
99330; 339 c231W
House
House of Commons

To ask Mr Attorney General, pursuant to the Parliamentary Secretary, Lord Chancellor's Department Answer of 19th May, 312 c341-2W, on the Roger Levitt case costs, how many prosecution preparation hours were claimed; and how they were assessed. - Inc ref to 262 c702-3W, 28 June 1995.

Asked by
Colin Pickthall (Labour)
Answering body
Attorney General
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
22 June 1998
Reference
314 c408W; 46590
House
House of Commons

To ask the Parliamentary Secretary, Lord Chancellor's Department, what were the final total costs of the Roger Levitt case broken down into (a) defence and (b) prosecution costs. - Includes available figures.

Asked by
Colin Pickthall (Labour)
Answering body
Lord Chancellor's Department
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
19 May 1998
Reference
312 c341-2W; 42268
House
House of Commons

To ask the President of the Board of Trade, to comment make on the application to extradite Mr Roger Levitt from the United States of America; and to comment on the advice given by Dept to the New York judge considering the application to extradite Mr Roger Levitt.

Asked by
Andrew Mackinlay (Labour)
Answering body
Department of Trade and Industry
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
10 November 1997
Reference
300 c403W; 14741;14742
House
House of Commons

Pursuant to the submissions received by his Department from (a) Jonathan Goldberg and (b) Sasha Wass in respect of the Roger Levitt case and the oral evidence heard by the Treasury and Civil Service Committee on 11th July, what assessment he has made of the accuracy of statements by (1)...

Asked by
Mike O'Brien (Labour)
Answering body
Attorney General
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
17 July 1995
Reference
35087; 263 c895-6W
House
House of Commons

If he will define the term `suggestion' as set out in his Answer to the honourable Member for Hendon South of December 1993, Official Report, 234 c336-7W, concerning the case of Roger Levitt. Pursuant to 262 c68-70W with regard to the meeting which took place on 5 November, comprising prosecuting...

Asked by
Mike O'Brien (Labour)
Answering body
Attorney General
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
17 July 1995
Reference
35090; 263 c894-5W
House
House of Commons

If he will appoint a senior QC or judge to inquire into allegations made to his Department by senior lawyers in respect of the accuracy of the information supplied by the Serious Fraud Office and its counsel to the Attorney to answer parliamentary questions on 17th December 1993. - No.

Asked by
Mike O'Brien (Labour)
Answering body
Attorney General
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
17 July 1995
Reference
35091; 263 c894W
House
House of Commons
Answered by
Lord Lyell of Markyate (Conservative)
Answering body
Attorney General
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
17 July 1995
Reference
263 c1303-4
House
House of Commons
1st supplementary calling for inquiry.
Asked by
Mike O'Brien (Labour)
Answering body
Attorney General
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
17 July 1995
Reference
263 c1303-4
House
House of Commons
Answered by
Lord Lyell of Markyate (Conservative)
Answering body
Attorney General
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
17 July 1995
Reference
263 c1303-4
House
House of Commons
Supplementary on Roger Levitt case and Serious Fraud Office.
Asked by
John Marshall (Conservative)
Answering body
Foreign and Commonwealth Office
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
17 July 1995
Reference
263 c1304-5
House
House of Commons
Answered by
Lord Lyell of Markyate (Conservative)
Answering body
Foreign and Commonwealth Office
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
17 July 1995
Reference
263 c1304-5
House
House of Commons
Answered by
Lord Lyell of Markyate (Conservative)
Answering body
Foreign and Commonwealth Office
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
17 July 1995
Reference
263 c1305
House
House of Commons
Supplementary on Roger Levitt case and call for independent inquiry.
Asked by
Lord Anderson of Swansea (Labour)
Answering body
Foreign and Commonwealth Office
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
17 July 1995
Reference
263 c1305
House
House of Commons
To comment on evidence to the Treasury and Civil Service Committee by the director of the Serious Fraud Office that he did not authorise plea bargaining in the Roger Levitt case.
Asked by
Mike O'Brien (Labour)
Answering body
Attorney General
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
17 July 1995
Reference
263 c1303-4
House
House of Commons

Pursuant to his Answer to the honourable Member for Swansea East of 19th June, Official Report, columns 68-70W, on discussions between counsel for the Crown and for Roger Levitt, precisely what pleas were in issue at each discussion and specifically when the Crown decided for the purposes of discussions or...

Asked by
Mike O'Brien (Labour)
Answering body
Attorney General
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
28 June 1995
Reference
262 c703-4W
House
House of Commons

On what date and in what circumstances it was communicated to Queen's Counsel for the Crown or his junior that Mr Roger Levitt would only agree to plead to a charge which would result in a non-custodial sentence. - Ref to 262 c68-70W.

Asked by
Mike O'Brien (Labour)
Answering body
Attorney General
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
28 June 1995
Reference
262 c706W
House
House of Commons

What assessment he has made of whether the reported comments of Queen's counsel for the Crown after the Mr Roger Levitt trial in respect of (a) the hearing of fraud cases by judges and (b) the sentence passed on the defendent were appropriate for a Crown prosecutor.

Asked by
Mike O'Brien (Labour)
Answering body
Attorney General
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
28 June 1995
Reference
262 c706W
House
House of Commons

What enquiries he made about the availability of Mr David Cocks in relation to the trial of Mr Roger Levitt; what account was taken of the probable length of the trial if contested; and what assessment he made as to the availability of Mr Cocks in respect of a contested...

Asked by
Mike O'Brien (Labour)
Answering body
Attorney General
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
28 June 1995
Reference
262 c703W
House
House of Commons