Skip to main content

Written question asked by Julia Drown (Labour) on Friday, 10 March 2000, in the House of Commons. It was due for an answer on Wednesday, 15 March 2000. It was answered by Melanie Johnson (Labour) on Wednesday, 15 March 2000 on behalf of the Treasury.


Treasury

Question
To ask Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer, what assessment he has made of the conclusion of the recent IMF Report on the value of capital controls.
Answer

Ms Drown: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what assessment he has made of the conclusion of the recent IMF report on the value of capital controls. [114714] Miss Melanie Johnson: The IMF report of 18 November 1999 helpfully advances interactional discussion on capital controls. The report makes clear that capital controls are no substitute for sound macroeconomic policies, and that strong prudential policies play an important role in orderly and successful capital account liberalisation. The Government believe that open capital markets can bring huge economic benefits, and support efforts to encourage orderly, progressive capital account liberalisation. The Government recognise that large short-term capital movements can be destabilising, and believe that the benefits of liberalisation are best enjoyed in countries which have embarked upon properly sequenced economic reform. Sound macroeconomic policy, open and credible institutions and procedures and a healthy financial sector are essential pre-conditions for orderly capital account liberalisation. At the Cologne Economic Summit, the UK Government and our G7 partners urged the IMF to continue its work on the appropriate pace and sequencing of capital market liberalisation, and to explore other issues related to the Fund's role in facilitating an orderly approach to liberalisation.


Secondary information

Type
Written question
Reference
346 c188W; 114714
Session
1999-00
Subjects
Capital Currency speculation Germany G8 International Monetary Fund Capital markets Free movement of capital