Skip to main content

Written question asked by Andrew Bennett (Labour) on Friday, 22 June 2001, in the House of Commons. It was due for an answer on Thursday, 5 July 2001. It was answered by Baroness Harman (Labour) on Thursday, 5 July 2001 on behalf of the Solicitor General.


Solicitor-General

Question
To ask the Solicitor General, what discussions she has had with the CPS on prosecution policy in respect of forging signatures on applications to vote by post at the last election.
Answer

Andrew Bennett: To ask the Solicitor-General what discussions she has had with the CPS on prosecution policy in respect of forging signatures on applications to vote by post at the last election. [915] The Solicitor-General: I have spoken to the Chief Executive of the CPS to discuss current prosecution policy. The police are responsible for investigating any complaints of forged postal applications to vote. As this is a specialised area of law, CPS headquarters handle all cases involving breaches of election law referred to the CPS by the police. All cases are reviewed in accordance with the Code for Crown Prosecutors, to assess the sufficiency of evidence and where appropriate the public interest in bringing a prosecution. CPS experience shows that allegations of this kind are received from a number of sources over a period of months. It is still too early to say whether the increase in postal voting had led to an increase in criminal complaints. In addition, the CPS liaises with the Electoral Commission as the Commission is required to publish a report on the conduct and administration of the recent general election.


Secondary information

Type
Written question
Reference
915; 371 c253W
Session
2001-02
Subjects
Absent voting Fraud Forgery General elections Prosecutions Policy Postal services Voting methods General Election 2001
Link
View this Written question on www.publications.parliament.uk