Written question asked by Nicholas Winterton (Conservative) on Wednesday, 4 April 2001, in the House of Commons. It was due for an answer on Monday, 9 April 2001. It was answered by Michael Meacher (Labour) on Monday, 9 April 2001 on behalf of the Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions.
Dept of the Environment Transport and the Regions
- Question
- To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions, for what reasons the Borough of Macclesfield is not included in the list of rural local authorities to which the emergency business rate relief scheme will be applied as a result of foot and mouth disease.
- Answer
-
Mr. Nicholas Winterton: To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions for what reasons the borough of Macclesfield is not included in the list of rural local authorities to which the emergency business rate relief scheme will be applied as a result of foot and mouth disease. [157496] Mr. Meacher: The borough of Macclesfield is not an authority which meets the criteria of rurality used for the targeting of this scheme.
Secondary information
- Type
- Written question
- Reference
- 157496; 366 c389W
- Session
- 2000-01
- Subjects
- Exemptions Foot and mouth disease Business rates Small businesses Macclesfield
- Link
- View this Written question on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2018-07-27 03:49:12 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_675205
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_675205
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_675205