Written question asked by Andrew Rowe (Conservative) on Monday, 26 March 2001, in the House of Commons. It was due for an answer on Monday, 2 April 2001. It was answered by Ross Cranston (Labour) on Monday, 2 April 2001 on behalf of the Solicitor General.

Solicitor-General

Question: To ask the Solicitor General, for what reason the Treasury Solicitor has not provided the substantive reply promised on 6th January 2000 in the case of Chesswood Harris v Ministry of Defence; when the Treasury Solicitor will provide the reply; and if he will make a statement.

Answer: Mr. Rowe: To ask the Solicitor-General for what reason the Treasury Solicitor has not provided the substantive reply promised on 6 January 2000 in the case of Chesswood Harris v. Ministry of Defence; when the Treasury Solicitor will provide the reply; and if he will make a statement. [156066] The Solicitor-General: I regret that the Treasury Solicitor has not provided the substantive reply referred to in the letter of 6 January 2000. I have today written to the hon. Member.

Secondary information