Skip to main content

Written question asked by Norman Baker (Liberal Democrat) on Wednesday, 15 May 2002, in the House of Commons. It was due for an answer on Thursday, 23 May 2002. It was answered by Angela Eagle (Labour) on Thursday, 23 May 2002 on behalf of the Home Office.


Home Office

Question
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what percentage of animal experiments carried out in the last year for which figures are available were mandatory, pursuant to legislative requirements and where the use of non-animal alternatives would not have met those requirements. - Includes figures. (Holding answer 22 May 2002).
Answer

Norman Baker: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what percentage of animal experiments carried out in the last year for which figures are available were mandatory, pursuant to legislative requirements and where the use of non-animal alternatives would not have met those requirements. [57924] Angela Eagle: [holding answer 22 May 2002]: Under the provisions of the Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986, animals can only be used in licensed scientific procedures when there is no alternative way to achieve the objective concerned, such as testing products using computer models, cell cultures and other in vitro methods. Animals are only used where fully justified and where the benefits outweigh the costs to the animals involved. The Statistics of Scientific Procedures on Living Animals Great Britain 2000, the last year for which figures are available, records that procedures for toxicological purposes--the category where legislative testing requirements usually apply--accounted for 17 per cent. of all procedures started in 2000. This proportion compares with 20 per cent. in 1999 and 25 per cent. in 1995. The majority of these toxicology/safety procedures (some 84 per cent.)--amounting to just over 14 per cent. of all procedures carried out in all categories--were performed to conform to legislative requirements. The procedures of this type carried out for non-legislative purposes include studies for refinement or replacement of live animal use in safety testing, as well as ecological studies. It may be additionally worth noting that pharmaceutical safety/efficacy evaluation purposes accounted for 60 per cent. of all procedures for toxicology, other safety and efficacy evaluations, and that no procedures were performed in 2000 for the purpose of evaluating the safety of either cosmetic products or ingredients.


Secondary information

Type
Written question
Reference
57924; 386 c554W
Session
2001-02
Subjects
Animal welfare Animal experiments Research Testing Science
Contains statistics
Yes
Link
View this Written question on www.publications.parliament.uk