Skip to main content

Written question asked by Jim Hood (Labour) on Tuesday, 18 December 2001, in the House of Commons. It was due for an answer on Tuesday, 8 January 2002. It was answered by Baroness Beckett (Labour) on Tuesday, 8 January 2002 on behalf of the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs.


Dept for Environment Food and Rural Affairs

Question
Statement on what the outcome was of the Agriculture Council held in Brussels on 19th and 20th December; what the Government's position was on each issue discussed, including its voting record; and if she will make a statement.
Answer

Mr. Hood: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what the outcome was of the Agriculture Council held in Brussels on 19 and 20 December; what the Government's position was on each issue discussed, including its voting record; and if she will make a statement. [25104] Margaret Beckett: I represented the United Kingdom at the meeting of the Agriculture Council in Brussels on 19 December 2001. Agriculture Ministers of the devolved Administrations in Wales and Northern Ireland were also present. The Council reached agreement on reform of the sheepmeat regime, including a number of measures for which the United Kingdom had pressed strongly. The changes will make substantial savings in the budget for the EU's current financial year. The main ones will fix permanent rates of premium and create national envelopes which can be directed towards national or regional priorities. Different approaches will be permitted in England and the devolved Administrations. I am delighted with this outcome which will give us some valuable flexibility in the operation of this importance regime. The Council also agreed to introduce a stabiliser which will cap spending in the seeds sector. The new arrangements fully safeguard UK interests. A further amendment of the banana regime was also agreed, bringing to a close a long running dispute with certain of the EU's trading partners. The presidency reported the successful outcome of the international conference on foot and mouth disease at which the United Kingdom had taken a prominent part. The Council discussed a memorandum from certain member states on the oilseeds market. I endorsed the Commission's response, arguing that further encouragement of oilseed production in the EU would be costly, unnecessary and likely to produce tension with our trading partners. The Council took note of progress on several dossiers under the Belgian presidency and exchanged views on a useful memorandum from the German Government on organic farming.


Secondary information

Type
Written question
Reference
377 c769-70W;377 c773W; 25104
Session
2001-02
Subjects
Foot and mouth disease EU action EU external trade Seeds Bananas EC Agriculture Council Sheep meat Oilseed rape Sheep premiums Common sheep meat regime
Link
View this Written question on www.publications.parliament.uk